Discuss Scratch

MrFluffyPenguins
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

_ReykjaviK_ wrote:

No-support, sorry. This I would not even look at, I just do something on another tab when it has the 60 second rule. Also if it is counting down it might make the page laggy.
Just my opinion though-
It isn't a live countdown.
girlsruless
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

bump
HTML-Fan
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

Support. Also here's my idea of a better 60s rule.
sowut123
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

I see no downside. Support.
whiteandblackcat
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

I'm a little concerned this might end up being a competition to make posts the fastest, for instance people trying to make two posts within 5 seconds of each other so they can get a screenshot of the 60 second rule, which would undoubtedly lead to spam. But people don't seem to spam just so they can get 60-second-rule-d and brag about it, so maybe it would be fine.
Sunarcher
Scratcher
100+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

NICE, i think @Za-Chary's version is pure genius. Support
Super_Scratch_Bros20
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

Sorry, but this is a duplicate.

Please continue the discussion in the link above. That way, the conversation sticks in one place, rather than being scattered across the forums.
BearSlothCoding
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:

Sorry, but this is a duplicate.

Please continue the discussion in the link above. That way, the conversation sticks in one place, rather than being scattered across the forums.
Actually, that one is a duplicate of this one.
Super_Scratch_Bros20
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

BearSlothCoding wrote:

Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:

Sorry, but this is a duplicate.

Please continue the discussion in the link above. That way, the conversation sticks in one place, rather than being scattered across the forums.
Actually, that one is a duplicate of this one.

Oof, double duplicate.

Regardless, please check for duplicates before making topics, @girlsruless. It's still a good idea, though!

(Wow, I've never seen a moderator combine two different topics into one.)

Last edited by Super_Scratch_Bros20 (June 29, 2020 18:32:41)

Paddle2See
Scratch Team
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

BearSlothCoding wrote:

Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:

Sorry, but this is a duplicate.

Please continue the discussion in the link above. That way, the conversation sticks in one place, rather than being scattered across the forums.
Actually, that one is a duplicate of this one.
Yeah - but that one talks about the 120 second limit (not the 60 second limit) - and there is almost no discussion on it. I think I will merge this with the other 60 second one and we'll go from there.
girlsruless
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

bump
I GOT THE 60 SECOND RULE ON THIS POST. REALLY?!
leahcimto
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

Support! This feature would be so awesome so then I wouldn't have to spam click the submit button over and over!
Yeetoburro1
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

leahcimto wrote:

Support! This feature would be so awesome so then I wouldn't have to spam click the submit button over and over!
Yeah, isn't it possible to get muted from spamming the submit button?
FloatingMuffins
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

Support. Would make things less awkward and wouldn't be too difficult to implement.
mybearworld
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

Duplicate… https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/54356/

Sorry, you have to wait 29 seconds between posts.
NotDucki_
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

mybearworld wrote:

Duplicate… https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/54356/

Paddle2See wrote:

BearSlothCoding wrote:

Actually, that is a duplicate of this one.
Yeah - but that one talks about the 120 second limit (not the 60 second limit) - and there is almost no discussion on it. I think I will merge this with the other 60 second one and we'll go from there.
Therefore, it is not a valid duplicate, according to P2S.

Last edited by NotDucki_ (Jan. 11, 2021 14:50:28)

mitdk
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

Support, for most of the reasons already stated. It should also change to:
Sorry, you have to wait (seconds left) before posting again

Or something along those lines

Last edited by mitdk (Jan. 12, 2021 00:04:34)

cs3866870
Scratcher
100+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

Mostly Support! +0.8
TopicBumper
New Scratcher
100+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

Bump.

I just need to bump around 460 more topics and create 5 constructive posts so that my shiny turd of an account gets allowed in for the lulz

Last edited by TopicBumper (Feb. 18, 2021 03:09:46)

Ihatr
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

TopicBumper wrote:

Bump.

I just need to bump around 460 more topics and create 5 constructive posts so that my shiny turd of an account gets allowed in for the lulz
Jokes on you, a manager can reject you if they don't feel you've been constructive enough!

Anyway, I feel this would help spammers spam more if they know. “Oh, 10 more seconds till I can post!”

Powered by DjangoBB