doggy_boi1 wrote:

2016s4m29 wrote:

extraterrestrialguy wrote:

-snip-

look

we were supposed to do a vote tho. did you ask ash? they were “running” too

ash is the co-owner

Hi there! I saw your invitation on the GDS, however, I feel like I have to address some things.

1. The link leads to the old topic, not this.
   
   
2. The invitation says, and I quote:
   

   The invitation wrote:

   … Formerly a solo operation run by @ilovestories and now ran by me, we have expanded! …

   Didn't you state that this was a tri-ownership? Are you taking all the credit for yourself, or did you just forget to change it? You modified it yourself, so if you didn't intend to take all the credit for yourself, you would've put the other two owners' names on the invitation. This concerns me.
   
   
3. I've also just noticed that you gave someone a managerial position only because they said “please.” No application was needed, just “please.”
   

   2016s4m29 wrote:

   extraterrestrialguy wrote:

   can i be manager plssssssssssssss
   

   Sure
   

   By this logic, I could also apply for a managerial position just by saying “please,” assuming that everyone gets equal treatment and you're not a nepotist. This is very unprofessional, and I hope you avoid doing this in the future.

new topic.

bRuHbRuHmEmEmAn wrote:

Hi there! I saw your invitation on the GDS, however, I feel like I have to address some things.

1. The link leads to the old topic, not this.
   
   
2. The invitation says, and I quote:
   

   The invitation wrote:

   … Formerly a solo operation run by @ilovestories and now ran by me, we have expanded! …

   Didn't you state that this was a tri-ownership? Are you taking all the credit for yourself, or did you just forget to change it? You modified it yourself, so if you didn't intend to take all the credit for yourself, you would've put the other two owners' names on the invitation. This concerns me.
   
   
3. I've also just noticed that you gave someone a managerial position only because they said “please.” No application was needed, just “please.”
   

   2016s4m29 wrote:

   extraterrestrialguy wrote:

   can i be manager plssssssssssssss
   

   Sure
   

   By this logic, I could also apply for a managerial position just by saying “please,” assuming that everyone gets equal treatment and you're not a nepotist. This is very unprofessional, and I hope you avoid doing this in the future.

also, we didn't do a voteeee
3 random employees just decided that they were owners, and now they're owners. this is something that ils would decide, but ils isn't here, so we need to do a vote.

Besides, 3 owners is a lot… imagine having to consult 3 different people just to partner with a shop or fire someone. There has to be some sort of ranking. What if they disagree with each other on something?

Lastly, this ownership is not very clear

• In the OP, you said that this shop was run by you alone
  
  
• In a post above, you said that ash was a co-owner, which implies that either bRuHbRuHmEmEmAn (do you have a nickname lol) is also co-owner or that you and bR- are owners and ash is co-owner
  
  
• Then bR- said that this was a triple ownership, implying 3 owners and no co-owner
  

I think yall are missing the point of having an “owner”. The whole point of having ranks is to make it easier to make decisions. So by having 3 or 2 owners, it kind of defeats the point

You have been invited to join ‘Shopiview’ a new shop that reviews any shop you want. We give truthful opinions and we rate your shops out of ten. Well if this is what you press here.

bRuHbRuHmEmEmAn wrote:

By this logic, I could also apply for a managerial position just by saying “please,” assuming that everyone gets equal treatment and you're not a nepotist. This is very unprofessional, and I hope you avoid doing this in the future.

we needed a manager. this is a one time situation

doggy_boi1 wrote:

In the OP, you said that this shop was run by you alone

Where does it say that

doggy_boi1 wrote:

In a post above, you said that ash was a co-owner, which implies that either bRuHbRuHmEmEmAn (do you have a nickname lol) is also co-owner or that you and bR- are owners and ash is co-owner

Okay, I am confusing y'all. me and ash are co-owners and bR- can tag along if he wants. I did not know that bR- said it was a triple ownership

RecessFails Will Remain As Manager

2016s4m29 wrote:

Okay, I am confusing y'all. me and ash are co-owners and bR- can tag along if he wants. I did not know that bR- said it was a triple ownership

Ok. but we still need to have the vote, and we still have too many owners

2016s4m29 wrote:

Where does it say that

in the invite that bR- quoted

we couldn't wait just 24 hours to where I'd have access to a computer? I'm not mad I understand this was something that was rushed, but me and @2016s4m29 agreed to share some pages on the OP.

Basically, one of us would have access to certain pages (front page, schedule, etc) and the other would get the rest. We would talk between ourselves on which pages we'd own, and if one person had more control over pages it would be the ones that are less impactful (example: the front page and rules), less impactful meaning smaller upkeep needs.

I wasn't online so @2016s4m29 just did it themselves but this is indeed a co-ownership, and it is a trial-based error. If the employees demand though I will not object to a vote, and I will find a neutral third person party to create an anonymous voting system and we read reconvene to read the result at a later date.

depresso-boiyo wrote:

If the employees demand though I will not object to a vote, and I will find a neutral third person party to create an anonymous voting system and we read reconvene to read the result at a later date.

I'm not interested in running, so I can make it if that's cool with you

doggy_boi1 wrote:

depresso-boiyo wrote:

If the employees demand though I will not object to a vote, and I will find a neutral third person party to create an anonymous voting system and we read reconvene to read the result at a later date.

I'm not interested in running, so I can make it if that's cool with you

I've read the entire thread and it seems like the employee base wanted a vote. I was going to ask a code shop to make one but if you want to, go for it. This does require the votes of staff though if we do an election or not though

depresso-boiyo wrote:

doggy_boi1 wrote:

depresso-boiyo wrote:

If the employees demand though I will not object to a vote, and I will find a neutral third person party to create an anonymous voting system and we read reconvene to read the result at a later date.

I'm not interested in running, so I can make it if that's cool with you

I've read the entire thread and it seems like the employee base wanted a vote. I was going to ask a code shop to make one but if you want to, go for it. This does require the votes of staff though if we do an election or not though

ill also run

2016s4m29 wrote:

depresso-boiyo wrote:

doggy_boi1 wrote:

depresso-boiyo wrote:

If the employees demand though I will not object to a vote, and I will find a neutral third person party to create an anonymous voting system and we read reconvene to read the result at a later date.

I'm not interested in running, so I can make it if that's cool with you

I've read the entire thread and it seems like the employee base wanted a vote. I was going to ask a code shop to make one but if you want to, go for it. This does require the votes of staff though if we do an election or not though

ill also run

then its settled. there will be an election on the next owner.

May the best candidate win, *shakes hand in pixel*

depresso-boiyo wrote:

2016s4m29 wrote:

depresso-boiyo wrote:

doggy_boi1 wrote:

depresso-boiyo wrote:

If the employees demand though I will not object to a vote, and I will find a neutral third person party to create an anonymous voting system and we read reconvene to read the result at a later date.

I'm not interested in running, so I can make it if that's cool with you

I've read the entire thread and it seems like the employee base wanted a vote. I was going to ask a code shop to make one but if you want to, go for it. This does require the votes of staff though if we do an election or not though

ill also run

then its settled. there will be an election on the next owner.

May the best candidate win, *shakes hand in pixel*

I hereby call the election for the soonest possible date. I will manage this topic until the results are out

I can do the election system. I play no part in this shop.

fyi: If it's made on scratch, there's no way for it to be anonymous. We're all on good terms anyways, so uh

Also, does everyone want to run? or should it just be for the 3 owners?

doggy_boi1 wrote:

fyi: If it's made on scratch, there's no way for it to be anonymous. We're all on good terms anyways, so uh

Also, does everyone want to run? or should it just be for the 3 owners?

i think only me and ash want to run

2016s4m29 wrote:

doggy_boi1 wrote:

fyi: If it's made on scratch, there's no way for it to be anonymous. We're all on good terms anyways, so uh

Also, does everyone want to run? or should it just be for the 3 owners?

i think only me and ash want to run

It's just me and 2016s4m29

depresso-boiyo wrote:

2016s4m29 wrote:

doggy_boi1 wrote:

fyi: If it's made on scratch, there's no way for it to be anonymous. We're all on good terms anyways, so uh

Also, does everyone want to run? or should it just be for the 3 owners?

i think only me and ash want to run

It's just me and 2016s4m29
[I am actively making campaign art too]

I can make a vote!!!