How About A Physics Engine Item?

kvackkvack

stickfiregames wrote:
No Support, It's Far Too Specific To Be A Built-In Feature Of Scratch, And If You Can't Make Your Own There Are Plenty Of Physics Engines Already Out There To Use.

And Why Do You Type Like This?

Why does that matter? If someone puts on a particular set of clothes, do you ask them “Why are you wearing those clothes?”?

MegaApuTurkUltra

kvackkvack wrote:
stickfiregames wrote:
No Support, It's Far Too Specific To Be A Built-In Feature Of Scratch, And If You Can't Make Your Own There Are Plenty Of Physics Engines Already Out There To Use.

And Why Do You Type Like This?
Why does that matter? If someone puts on a particular set of clothes, do you ask them “Why are you wearing those clothes?”?

I don't understand your analogy here. Clothes have nothing to do with this. This is about how much this suggestion is going to help different types of Scratchers. As I said,

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:
sCratch cAn't hAve a bLock fOr eVerything. fOr eXample,
dRaw a sParkly uNicorn::pen
mIght bE uSeful fOr mAybe a fEw pEople, bUt tHe lArge mAjority oF sCratch uSers dOn't bEnefit.

Iditaroid

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:
kvackkvack wrote:
stickfiregames wrote:
No Support, It's Far Too Specific To Be A Built-In Feature Of Scratch, And If You Can't Make Your Own There Are Plenty Of Physics Engines Already Out There To Use.

And Why Do You Type Like This?
Why does that matter? If someone puts on a particular set of clothes, do you ask them “Why are you wearing those clothes?”?
I don't understand your analogy here. Clothes have nothing to do with this. This is about how much this suggestion is going to help different types of Scratchers. As I said,
MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:
sCratch cAn't hAve a bLock fOr eVerything. fOr eXample,
dRaw a sParkly uNicorn::pen
mIght bE uSeful fOr mAybe a fEw pEople, bUt tHe lArge mAjority oF sCratch uSers dOn't bEnefit.

I think kvackkvack is talking about the typing thing!

kvackkvack

Iditaroid wrote:
MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:
kvackkvack wrote:
stickfiregames wrote:
No Support, It's Far Too Specific To Be A Built-In Feature Of Scratch, And If You Can't Make Your Own There Are Plenty Of Physics Engines Already Out There To Use.

And Why Do You Type Like This?
Why does that matter? If someone puts on a particular set of clothes, do you ask them “Why are you wearing those clothes?”?
I don't understand your analogy here. Clothes have nothing to do with this. This is about how much this suggestion is going to help different types of Scratchers. As I said,
MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:
sCratch cAn't hAve a bLock fOr eVerything. fOr eXample,
dRaw a sParkly uNicorn::pen
mIght bE uSeful fOr mAybe a fEw pEople, bUt tHe lArge mAjority oF sCratch uSers dOn't bEnefit.
I think kvackkvack is talking about the typing thing!

XD Yes, I am.

OmnipotentPotato

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:
Alberknyis wrote:
hoW woulD thE projecT knoW hoW anD wheN tO stimulatE physicS? thereS certaiN wayS physicS caN worK (trusT mE oN thiS) anD iT wilL havE nO ideA whaT yoU wanT. therE arE thingS likE gravitY anD frictioN anD elasticY anD otheR thingS I donT eveN knoW abouT. hoW woulD thiS makE anythinG easieR foR A beginneR?
eXactly! sCratch cAn't hAve a bLock fOr eVerything. fOr eXample,
dRaw a sParkly uNicorn::pen
mIght bE uSeful fOr mAybe a fEw pEople, bUt tHe lArge mAjority oF sCratch uSers dOn't bEnefit. nExt tIme wHen pRoposing sUggestions, mAke sUre tHey aRe hElpful tO a lArge vAriety oF sCratchers.
mAn tYping lIke tHis tAkes fOrever…

i'M DoInG a sUggEsTioN foR thAt yEs PlEAse

TheHockeyist

MY EYES!!!!!!!!!

/offtopic.

Firedrake969

TheHockeyist wrote:
MY EYES!!!!!!!!!

/offtopic.

|\/|`/ 3`/35

No support for similar reasons, such as the dRaWsPaRkLyUnIcOrN block.

Last edited by Firedrake969 (March 1, 2015 22:18:03)

Zro716

I'm sorry for this insensitive remark but I won't even consider supporting the idea if I can't understand the suggestion behind the excess of capitalized words. It's like trying to read a 12-pt. font paragraph through a dense wire mesh from 2 ft away.

Please revise your post so that it is easy for everyone to read and understand.

MegaApuTurkUltra

Zro716 wrote:
I'm sorry for this insensitive remark but I won't even consider supporting the idea if I can't understand the suggestion behind the excess of capitalized words. It's like trying to read a 12-pt. font paragraph through a dense wire mesh from 2 ft away.

Please revise your post so that it is easy for everyone to read and understand.

+1
I expected no less from you Zro

Edit: I'm saving this for future use

Last edited by MegaApuTurkUltra (March 2, 2015 00:07:18)

little_kitten

powercon5 wrote:
cosmicrush wrote:
How About A Physics Engine? I Mean It Would Be Cool As It Would Help Beginners Like Me
How About An Option To Make A Platformer Physic Game
Or Maybe A Point And Click Game

it would remove the point of scratch
what would be the point?

It would not remove the entire point, but yea, I disagree with him.

CatsUnited

little_kitten wrote:
powercon5 wrote:
cosmicrush wrote:
How About A Physics Engine? I Mean It Would Be Cool As It Would Help Beginners Like Me
How About An Option To Make A Platformer Physic Game
Or Maybe A Point And Click Game

it would remove the point of scratch
what would be the point?
It would not remove the entire point, but yea, I disagree with him.

But creating a physics engine would take a lot of potential coding. Also, adding templates will not happen. You can remix projects like a platformer base though. Also,

OmnipotentPotato wrote:
MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:
Alberknyis wrote:
hoW woulD thE projecT knoW hoW anD wheN tO stimulatE physicS? thereS certaiN wayS physicS caN worK (trusT mE oN thiS) anD iT wilL havE nO ideA whaT yoU wanT. therE arE thingS likE gravitY anD frictioN anD elasticY anD otheR thingS I donT eveN knoW abouT. hoW woulD thiS makE anythinG easieR foR A beginneR?
eXactly! sCratch cAn't hAve a bLock fOr eVerything. fOr eXample,
dRaw a sParkly uNicorn::pen
mIght bE uSeful fOr mAybe a fEw pEople, bUt tHe lArge mAjority oF sCratch uSers dOn't bEnefit. nExt tIme wHen pRoposing sUggestions, mAke sUre tHey aRe hElpful tO a lArge vAriety oF sCratchers.
mAn tYping lIke tHis tAkes fOrever…
i'M DoInG a sUggEsTioN foR thAt yEs PlEAse

Draw a Sparkly Unicorn?

Alberknyis

kvackkvack wrote:
Why does that matter? If someone puts on a particular set of clothes, do you ask them “Why are you wearing those clothes?”?

If the set of clothes they're wearing has fifteen sleeves, is made of twigs and tar, stops them from walking properly and makes objects randomly attract to them every 1 - 2 minutes, yes I would.

You might be wondering how this relates the typing. In my opinion, normal clothes to clothes above is to normal typing to Every Word Capitalized Typing.

Last edited by Alberknyis (March 2, 2015 08:03:08)

Alberknyis

Zro716 wrote:
I'm sorry for this insensitive remark but I won't even consider supporting the idea if I can't understand the suggestion behind the excess of capitalized words. It's like trying to read a 12-pt. font paragraph through a dense wire mesh from 2 ft away.

Oh. Let me put on my slightly larger glasses for that.

Iditaroid

Zro716 wrote:
I'm sorry for this insensitive remark but I won't even consider supporting the idea if I can't understand the suggestion behind the excess of capitalized words.

kvackkvack

Alberknyis wrote:
kvackkvack wrote:
Why does that matter? If someone puts on a particular set of clothes, do you ask them “Why are you wearing those clothes?”?

If the set of clothes they're wearing has fifteen sleeves, is made of twigs and tar, stops them from walking properly and makes objects randomly attract to them every 1 - 2 minutes, yes I would.

You might be wondering how this relates the typing. In my opinion, normal clothes to clothes above is to normal typing to Every Word Capitalized Typing.

But Writing Like This Is not detrimental to anyone - it's easy to ignore.

memel0rd

kvackkvack wrote:
Alberknyis wrote:
kvackkvack wrote:
Why does that matter? If someone puts on a particular set of clothes, do you ask them “Why are you wearing those clothes?”?

If the set of clothes they're wearing has fifteen sleeves, is made of twigs and tar, stops them from walking properly and makes objects randomly attract to them every 1 - 2 minutes, yes I would.

You might be wondering how this relates the typing. In my opinion, normal clothes to clothes above is to normal typing to Every Word Capitalized Typing.
But Writing Like This Is not detrimental to anyone - it's easy to ignore.

It's really not.

But still, are people really going to dogpile this person with “Why Are You Typing Like This” messages when you could just take 5 more seconds to read the suggestion and reply in a reasonable manner?

MegaApuTurkUltra

memel0rd wrote:
kvackkvack wrote:
Alberknyis wrote:
kvackkvack wrote:
Why does that matter? If someone puts on a particular set of clothes, do you ask them “Why are you wearing those clothes?”?

If the set of clothes they're wearing has fifteen sleeves, is made of twigs and tar, stops them from walking properly and makes objects randomly attract to them every 1 - 2 minutes, yes I would.

You might be wondering how this relates the typing. In my opinion, normal clothes to clothes above is to normal typing to Every Word Capitalized Typing.
But Writing Like This Is not detrimental to anyone - it's easy to ignore.
It's really not.

But still, are people really going to dogpile this person with “Why Are You Typing Like This” messages when you could just take 5 more seconds to read the suggestion and reply in a reasonable manner?

I did. Assuming that copying OP's style is “reasonable”

memel0rd

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:
memel0rd wrote:
kvackkvack wrote:
Alberknyis wrote:
kvackkvack wrote:
Why does that matter? If someone puts on a particular set of clothes, do you ask them “Why are you wearing those clothes?”?

If the set of clothes they're wearing has fifteen sleeves, is made of twigs and tar, stops them from walking properly and makes objects randomly attract to them every 1 - 2 minutes, yes I would.

You might be wondering how this relates the typing. In my opinion, normal clothes to clothes above is to normal typing to Every Word Capitalized Typing.
But Writing Like This Is not detrimental to anyone - it's easy to ignore.
It's really not.

But still, are people really going to dogpile this person with “Why Are You Typing Like This” messages when you could just take 5 more seconds to read the suggestion and reply in a reasonable manner?
I did. Assuming that copying OP's style is “reasonable”

I wasn't necessarily talking to you

By the way - my sister used to type like this. She said she thought it looked orderly and neat - I don't agree with this though. It looks like a bunch of gobbledygook to me.

Last edited by memel0rd (March 2, 2015 17:16:18)

scratchperson315

ShadowFlareX wrote:
Program it yourself.
That's the point of scratch.

Not always. If i didnt know how to use, 5 certian blocks, i could ask a friend to help. Otherwise, why would there even be a forum! This would turn into a develeper's site then!

Blueinkproductions

nO sUPPORT iN tHE sUGGESTION'S cURRENT fORM. i dON'T eVEN kNOW hOW iT wOULD wORK. wOULD iT bE a bLOCK oR sOMETHING? oR wOULD iT bE aN eXAMPLE sPRITE tHAT iNCLUDED a pLATFORMER eNGINE iN iT. i wOULD sUPPORT tHE sECOND iDEA, bUT tHE fIRST oNE iS mADNESS. i tHINK tHAT tHERE wAS a sPRITE lIKE tHIS iN 1.4.

Discuss Scratch