Let's give this form rules
rule 1: you can't post if you're not banned so like (removed by moderator - please don't name names) can post but I can't on this form
rule 2: no talking about the post being made it's obvious why

No support. This would just have banned users spreading inappropriate content, which they can't get banned because what-do-you-know, they already are!

MudkipKappa wrote:

No support. This would just have banned users spreading inappropriate content, which they can't get banned because what-do-you-know, they already are!

hey there's already a filter of inappropriate content in the forms why would they get removed for banned people

odin123com549 wrote:

MudkipKappa wrote:

No support. This would just have banned users spreading inappropriate content, which they can't get banned because what-do-you-know, they already are!

hey there's already a filter of inappropriate content in the forms why would they get removed for banned people

It can be easily bypassed, and since it uses the same filter as the rest of the site, the banned user would know how to bypass it.

Overall, this suggestion is unnecessary and is prone to inappropriate content. It's also mainly an “anything” forum, which isn't allowed. Use a separate social media instead to communicate, as someone being banned usually means Scratch is not for them.

why would banned users have a forum they can post on while they can’t access anything else

Eh… how this idea can exist? I mean, if people are named banned, it’s for a reason… they’re not banned because it makes ST happy. No support

If they are banned then how are they supposed to post topics on the forums that make no sense

(also you're the same user who says Numberblocks and bfdi is not copyrighted it is.)

No Support makes no sense because if your banned you can't access anything also this feels like a joke topic :p

This will just be people complaining about their ban, and wasting time they could use to appeal.

Also, what if these banned users, which have a track record of breaking the Community Guidelines, decide to break the guidelines?

A ban is a ban from Scratch as a whole, no exceptions (yes I know the offline editor, etc I'm solely addressing the Scratch website). If a user wants to share what they've been doing while they're banned, they can do so once the ban is over.

MudkipKappa wrote:

No support. This would just have banned users spreading inappropriate content, which they can't get banned because what-do-you-know, they already are!

Great point! We would not want that at all.