cookieclickerer33 wrote:

id love this, but it would break most advanced projects as they rely on 30fps to time things instead of using seconds or something like that

in fact

wait (0) secs

waits one frame, this would also make projects with custom blocks lag more because its running the warp so much faster

also like 70% of all screens have a 60hz refresh rate, and im not 100% sure but i think web browsers are usally limited to 60hz as well

so really the best they could do is 60fps, that would make alot of sense as most programs tend to run natively at 60fps

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Use Turbowarp.

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

id love this, but it would break most advanced projects as they rely on 30fps to time things instead of using seconds or something like that

in fact

wait (0) secs

waits one frame, this would also make projects with custom blocks lag more because its running the warp so much faster

also like 70% of all screens have a 60hz refresh rate, and im not 100% sure but i think web browsers are usally limited to 60hz as well

so really the best they could do is 60fps, that would make alot of sense as most programs tend to run natively at 60fps

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Use Turbowarp.

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Use Turbowarp.

sonic__fan wrote:

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Use Turbowarp.

We're asking for something to be added to SCRATCH not TURBOWARP.
Also, my school district blocks TurboWarp. What about those people?

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Use Turbowarp.

We're asking for something to be added to SCRATCH not TURBOWARP.
Also, my school district blocks TurboWarp. What about those people?

I mean that just use Turbowarp and because of that there's no reason to accept this suggestion.
Some districts can block Scratch too, what about those people?
Some districts can block Google too, what about those people?
Some districts can block browsers too, what about those people?

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Use Turbowarp.

We're asking for something to be added to SCRATCH not TURBOWARP.
Also, my school district blocks TurboWarp. What about those people?

I mean that just use Turbowarp and because of that there's no reason to accept this suggestion.

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Some districts can block Scratch too, what about those people?

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Some districts can block Google too, what about those people?

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Some districts can block browsers too, what about those people?

sonic__fan wrote:

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Use Turbowarp.

We're asking for something to be added to SCRATCH not TURBOWARP.
Also, my school district blocks TurboWarp. What about those people?

I mean that just use Turbowarp and because of that there's no reason to accept this suggestion.

Just because you can use another website doesn't make it so it can't come here. And I'm telling you right now, half of Scratchers don't know of TurboWarp. I used Scratch for seven years, and I only heard of it last year.

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Some districts can block Scratch too, what about those people?

If they block Scratch, then none of this matters to them. Why should we care for them?

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Some districts can block Google too, what about those people?

What about them? What does Google have to do with this? You can't even get to Scratch if you block Google, so why should we care for those people?

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Some districts can block browsers too, what about those people?

What do browsers have to do with Scratch? And if your school district blocks browsers, then how would you get to Scratch in the first place?

I will say it again, saying “just use another website” is not a good reason to not support a suggestion. Most people on this site do not know of those other websites, and just because you can use another website doesn't mean it shouldn't be added here.

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

I am not saying that I don't support this suggestion, I am pretty sure I semi-support this. I am just offering alternative solutions.

sonic__fan wrote:

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Some districts can block Google too, what about those people?

What about them? What does Google have to do with this? You can't even get to Scratch if you block Google, so why should we care for those people?

IndexErrorException wrote:

240 FPS would allow much smoother graphics which like quite nice. Some nice optimizations would also be in order.

ajskateboarder wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Some districts can block Google too, what about those people?

What about them? What does Google have to do with this? You can't even get to Scratch if you block Google, so why should we care for those people?

Google isn't a web browser

sonic__fan wrote:

ajskateboarder wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Some districts can block Google too, what about those people?

What about them? What does Google have to do with this? You can't even get to Scratch if you block Google, so why should we care for those people?

Google isn't a web browser

It's a search engine. Almost everyone uses Google, so if it was banned, it'd be very hard to find Scratch.

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

ajskateboarder wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

__Falcon-Games__ wrote:

Some districts can block Google too, what about those people?

What about them? What does Google have to do with this? You can't even get to Scratch if you block Google, so why should we care for those people?

Google isn't a web browser

It's a search engine. Almost everyone uses Google, so if it was banned, it'd be very hard to find Scratch.

You can just type “scratch.mit.edu” into the URL bar, no search engines required.

Zydrolic wrote:

The servers have loads of workload;