I like the idea, but horrid way of putting it- not to mention IT ALREADY EXISTS LOL

when I receive [bio v]
show variable [SIBLINGS v]

-GaIaxy_cat- wrote:

I like the idea, but horrid way of putting it- not to mention IT ALREADY EXISTS LOL

when I receive [bio v]
show variable [SIBLINGS v]

Uhhh, no, that’s not what the OP meant-

-GaIaxy_cat- wrote:

I like the idea, but horrid way of putting it- not to mention IT ALREADY EXISTS LOL

when I receive [bio v]
show variable [SIBLINGS v]

OP meant like having siblings get special benefits. There's no way to easily replicate this. Easily.

You can do it though, it just requires Replit, Scratchattach, Python and coding knowledge.

overtpopcorn704 wrote:

k7e wrote:

overtpopcorn704 wrote:

k7e wrote:

eikh2 wrote:

So sisters are excluded?
No support for the benefits.

ninjahanzo wrote:

what about sisters?

EngineerRunner wrote:

what about sisters?

-OdysseyCentral- wrote:

Bro thought everyone is a man/boy ☠️

Zydrolic wrote:

If James Charles saw this suggestion he'd be doin HI SISTERS yet again

The OP:

Whatsfordinner77 wrote:

Or maybe we could add the same sort of system but with sisters instead.

what about people who have a sibling who is not the same gender as them

I think we can assume that something like this would also be added.

so would it be “siblingly” instead of brotherly?

If your a boy it would still be brotherly
A girl would be sisterly

No support, why is his needed?
Just make a shared account or something, or on your about me.
Shared accounts are allowed between family in The same house

Why won't it would be siblings?

Reminder: Joke suggestions should be reserved for April fools day only
As a non joke version probably just allowing multiple accounts on 1 email and having both accounts projects/favs/hearts be linked

AnotherTwentyFour wrote:

Why won't it would be siblings?

It makes more sense to change it to siblings, but yet again, this suggestion has a lot of holes in it, not to mention that not everyone on Scratch are all family.

but why though? just use the follow button! its that easy!
i really have no words here.
so have this:

this is the filler nom lad yes i know offtopic but hold on
nomnom lad does NOT want to be known that he is the brother of this goober:

the reason? because they can do their own thing,
also adding this sibling block:

hello i am a sibling of [nomnom the first v] ::#aaeeff

would probaly crash scratch projects

EDIT: i saw that it would give you extra things and i feel that is a dlc called: “another kid!!1!1”

Scratch is supposed to be a starter programming language. I don't know of any starter programming languages with “brotherly, ain't it” blocks. Besides, what would this do?

when green flag clicked
brotherly, ain't it? :: grey

Another thing, what sort of ID verification could there be that most kids (the majority of Scratch users) have?

just made this alt (main is lapisi), tell me now, what exactly do you propose the ST does to stop this alt from being used for this feature?

labrosi wrote:

just made this alt (main is lapisi), tell me now, what exactly do you propose the ST does to stop this alt from being used for this feature?

ID verification, like the OP says.

k7e wrote:

(#71)

labrosi wrote:

just made this alt (main is lapisi), tell me now, what exactly do you propose the ST does to stop this alt from being used for this feature?

ID verification, like the OP says.

and exactly what kind of ID would be used to verify?

Whatsfordinner77 wrote:

BobRocks20 wrote:

I read through OP's post. Yes, I saw them mention sisters. But this whole “brotherly” talk is pushing sisters off to the side, and as a female I find that sexist.

As for the suggestion itself, I don't support. I don't see a good use for the “brotherly” block and I don't think I'll ever use it anyway.

I wasn't even being sexist. Literally, stop accusing me of literal sexism just because I focused on brothers.

Well, why is it called the “brother feature” then? I know there are girls who say bro to refer to other people but we're talking about brothers. And brothers are associated with male people. Why would you put emphasis on brothers anyway? You could've reworded the whole topic to include brothers and sisters, like pretty much everyone else is saying. Now that's inclusive. And Scratch wants to be inclusive.

Literally (I hate when this is used figuratively but I have no choice), respect my literal perspective on this. Please. The last thing I want to happen here is a flame war, and we could be banned if this ever happens.

maybe it could be called the siblings project

I-N-U wrote:

maybe it could be called the siblings project

^^ I agree with @I-N-U.

lapisi wrote:

(#72)

k7e wrote:

(#71)

labrosi wrote:

just made this alt (main is lapisi), tell me now, what exactly do you propose the ST does to stop this alt from being used for this feature?

ID verification, like the OP says.

and exactly what kind of ID would be used to verify?

bump so I can get an answer

bump

Looks like the title was edited to prove that it would be the same for all siblings.

why do I feel like you made this topic just so you could suggest a block that says, “brotherly, ain't it?”