Knightbot63 wrote:

-ElectronicArts- wrote:

(#179)
Amazing orange is a US president!

Competing in 2024 election are Apples and Bananas

-TwentyFour- wrote:

I asked Bard to tell a random fact about space.

Bard wrote:

The number of stars in the universe is a very difficult number to estimate. This is because we can only see a small part of the universe, and we don't know how many galaxies are out there that we can't see. However, scientists have made some estimates based on the number of galaxies that we can see, and the number of stars that we know are in those galaxies.

One estimate puts the number of stars in the universe at 100 sextillion. That's a 1 followed by 21 zeros! To put that in perspective, there are about 7.5 sextillion grains of sand on all the beaches on Earth. So, there are about 13 times more stars in the universe than there are grains of sand on Earth.

Another estimate puts the number of stars in the universe at 700 sextillion. That's a 1 followed by 24 zeros! This estimate is based on the assumption that the universe is much larger than we can see, and that there are many more galaxies out there that we can't see.

So, which estimate is correct? We don't know for sure. But either way, the number of stars in the universe is mind-bogglingly large. It's hard to even imagine how many stars there are out there.

Here are some other interesting facts about the number of stars in the universe:

• If you were to count one star per second, it would take you 22 million years to count all the stars in the observable universe.
  
• If you were to line up all the stars in the observable universe, they would stretch for 100 trillion light-years.
  
• The number of stars in the universe is so large that it is impossible to count them all.
  

The vastness of the universe is truly awe-inspiring. It's hard to imagine how many stars there are out there, and how many mysteries the universe still holds.

It's like a Wikipedia article, it is not talking like humans. But, it did provide a lot of useful information.

Knightbot63 wrote:

Do not ask bard to create a Mario Ascii art image. It won't work.

DifferentDance8 wrote:

Knightbot63 wrote:

Do not ask bard to create a Mario Ascii art image. It won't work.

:troll:

Bard wrote:

Sure, here is a simple navigation bar in HTML and CSS:

```html
<nav class=“navbar”>
<ul class=“nav-links”>
<li><a href=“#”>Home</a></li>
<li><a href=“#”>About</a></li>
<li><a href=“#”>Contact</a></li>
</ul>
</nav>
```

```css
.navbar {
background-color: #000;
color: #fff;
padding: 10px;
margin: 0;
list-style-type: none;
}

.nav-links {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
}

.nav-links li {
margin: 0 10px;
}

.nav-links a {
text-decoration: none;
color: #fff;
}

.nav-links a:hover {
color: #ccc;
}
```

This code will create a simple navigation bar with three links: Home, About, and Contact. The background color of the navigation bar is black, the text color is white, and the padding is 10px. The list-style-type is set to none, so there will be no bullets. The navigation links are displayed in a flexbox container, which will make them distribute evenly across the width of the screen. The links are also given a margin of 0 10px to space them out a bit. When a link is hovered over, the color will change to gray.

To use this code, you would need to save it as an HTML file and then open it in a web browser. You can also modify the code to add more links or change the appearance of the navigation bar.

Knightbot63 wrote:

(#188)
Seeing if this works or not…

Knightbot63 wrote:

(#189)
It did not.

Knightbot63 wrote:

Knightbot63 wrote:

(#189)
It did not.

Bard meant to make the CSS different instead of 3 dots.

Knightbot63 wrote:

I think bard just suddenly died with the other AIs.

-ElectronicArts- wrote:

Knightbot63 wrote:

I think bard just suddenly died with the other AIs.

AI is too overated.

Bard wrote:

Sure, there are a few other large language models that are similar to Bard. Here are a few of the most popular:

* **ChatGPT:** ChatGPT is a large language model from OpenAI that is powered by GPT-4. It is similar to Bard in that it can generate text, translate languages, write different kinds of creative content, and answer your questions in an informative way. However, ChatGPT is specifically designed for chatbots, so it may be better at generating natural-sounding conversation than Bard.

* **Jasper Chat:** Jasper Chat is another large language model from OpenAI that is powered by GPT-3.5. It is similar to Bard and ChatGPT in that it can generate text, translate languages, write different kinds of creative content, and answer your questions in an informative way. However, Jasper Chat is specifically designed for customer service chatbots, so it may be better at understanding and responding to customer queries than Bard or ChatGPT.

* **Vicuna:** Vicuna is an open-source large language model that is trained on a dataset of text and code. It is similar to Bard in that it can generate text, translate languages, write different kinds of creative content, and answer your questions in an informative way. However, Vicuna is still under development, so it may not be as accurate or reliable as Bard.


Ultimately, the best Bard alternative for you will depend on your specific needs and preferences. If you are looking for a large language model that is specifically designed for chatbots, then ChatGPT or Jasper Chat may be a better choice for you. If you are looking for a large language model that is still under development but has the potential to be very powerful, then Vicuna may be a good option.

I hope this helps!

BreadcatGames wrote:

Knightbot63 wrote:

To join the waitlist, you need to be 18+.

AYO what’s google training that AI on!?