SpyCoderX wrote:

But why? What’s the use of this?

all at once {
glide (1) secs to x: (0) y: (0)
say [wee!] for (1) secs
} :: control

say [wee!]
glide (1) secs to x: (0) y: (0)
say []

VedanshS933 wrote:

(#63)

medians wrote:

Can you somehow change the block name or something so it doesn't get confused with the 2.0 alpha all at once block?

You could suggest one. I don't have any ideas

run in parallel {
say [Hello!] for (2) secs
}{
play note (60) for (0.25) beats
}{
rest for (0.0625) beats
play note (72) for (0.25) beats
} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ @delInput @addInput::control

run in parallel {
say [Hello!] for (2) secs::cap
play note (60) for (0.25) beats::cap
if <(50)=(50)> then {
rest for (0.0625) beats
play note (72) for (0.25) beats
}::control cap
}::control

nembence wrote:

VedanshS933 wrote:

(#63)

medians wrote:

Can you somehow change the block name or something so it doesn't get confused with the 2.0 alpha all at once block?

You could suggest one. I don't have any ideas

What about this?

run in parallel {
say [Hello!] for (2) secs
}{
play note (60) for (0.25) beats
}{
rest for (0.0625) beats
play note (72) for (0.25) beats
} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ @delInput @addInput::control

or, if growable C-blocks aren't possible:
with this one the problem is that blocks stacked together are expected to wait for each other, so maybe convert the blocks dropped in it into cap blocks

run in parallel {
say [Hello!] for (2) secs::cap
play note (60) for (0.25) beats::cap
if <(50)=(50)> then {
rest for (0.0625) beats
play note (72) for (0.25) beats
}::control cap
}::control