Discuss Scratch

sugarglidertotten
Scratcher
33 posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

Fan-the-Bomb
Scratcher
1 post

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

Agree
wvj
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

Current Millisecond is a duplicate.
ducktotten
Scratcher
1 post

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

I agree
sugarglidertotten
Scratcher
33 posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

wvj wrote:

Current Millisecond is a duplicate.
Thanks for telling me
Socialix
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

A nanosecond and a microsecond is very small and fast, why would ANYONE use it? I twould go from 0 to 60 in like, 0.0000000 seconds!

Anyway, a milisecond is a duplicate, credit to @wvj for pointing that out above.
BarelySmooth
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

This wouldn't be feasible at all. There are no practical uses for a nanosecond for Scratch Projects
wvj
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

Fan-the-Bomb wrote:

Agree

ducktotten wrote:

I agree

Please say why
Ankit_Anmol
Scratcher
500+ posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

Millisecond? Ok… nano and micro??????? IS THIS A JOKE?
builderluke
Scratcher
100+ posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

why micro- and nanoseconds? aren't they kinda small
sugarglidertotten
Scratcher
33 posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

I vote that there should be a current millisecond, microsecond, nanosecond, even if not many people need it it’s not gonna do any harm just to be a block. I like to build a lot of clock things or timers and for milliseconds, microseconds, nanosecond. it would be easier to have current milli, micro and nano seconds then days since 2000 * 86400000 mod 1000. I spent hours browsing the internet for a code for these timings and I found the millisecond discussion and thought it should be a thing. Also Macie 1234 for the code script I actually found in the discussion. 100% full support. Even if no one uses it, it doesn’t do any harm does it? Just to have extra?

-sugarglidertotten
sugarglidertotten
Scratcher
33 posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

lovecodeabc
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

sugarglidertotten wrote:

I vote that there should be a current millisecond, microsecond, nanosecond, even if not many people need it it’s not gonna do any harm just to be a block. I like to build a lot of clock things or timers and for milliseconds, microseconds, nanosecond. it would be easier to have current milli, micro and nano seconds then days since 2000 * 86400000 mod 1000. I spent hours browsing the internet for a code for these timings and I found the millisecond discussion and thought it should be a thing. Also Macie 1234 for the code script I actually found in the discussion. 100% full support. Even if no one uses it, it doesn’t do any harm does it? Just to have extra?

-sugarglidertotten
Well, microsecond would be TOTALLY inaccurate since HPCs (High Precision Clocks) are about 22,500 miles above Earth in geosyncronous orbit, and about time delay being about 5 seconds..
Nanoseconds will totally blind you
Support for milliseconds tho.
sugarglidertotten
Scratcher
33 posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

Okay I get your point my main argument is for milliseconds micro and nano is reasonable but millisecond totally needs to be a thing
sugarglidertotten
Scratcher
33 posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

Even if not many people need it it’s not gonna do any harm just to be a block.
sugarglidertotten
Scratcher
33 posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

(current [millisecond v])
sugarglidertotten
Scratcher
33 posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

when green flag clicked
say (current [millisecond v]) for (2) secs
sugarglidertotten
Scratcher
33 posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

wvj wrote:

Fan-the-Bomb wrote:

Agree

ducktotten wrote:

I agree

Please say why
Why is because those are my accounts too I have multiple
airplanedodge
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

sugarglidertotten wrote:

wvj wrote:

Fan-the-Bomb wrote:

Agree

ducktotten wrote:

I agree

Please say why
Why is because those are my accounts too I have multiple
Hah. using you own accts to get supporters?
sorry for being a bit harsh

Last edited by airplanedodge (April 28, 2021 13:26:08)

7salad3salad
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond

Anyways, no support. i just dont think that they would be useful (maybe millisecond but)

Socialix wrote:

Anyway, a milisecond is a duplicate, credit to @wvj for pointing that out above.
And since wvj already said it, you didn't have to.

Powered by DjangoBB