deviantart has 18+ content, and you can commission artists. it is also unmoderated and has private messaging. even though it is a creative site, aggie.io for example is also a creative site but it's not allowed.

support, I see no reason why it should be allowed.
Wow: That typo lasted 6 months.

Support, linking to someone's art doesn't seem harmful at first, but if you look at their profile, you can easily find shocking and disturbing content not suitable for everyone.

Support. It has 18+ content not suitable for all ages.
However, you will have to create an account to see 18+ stuff.
But since you can commission artists, I think that it should be blocked from being linked.

Yes, there's a lot of NSFW content therefore, it should be under the filter for sure.

Wait, devianart links weren't censored? Well in that case, Support, because unmoderated chat and 18+ age content should NOT be allowed in scratch, as people to ages 6-18+ are here on this website, and we all have different backgrounds and opinions.

dhuls wrote:

support, I see no reason why it shouldn't be allowed.

Do you mean, "I see no reason why it should be allowed"?
I understand bad grammar, because I'm a bad grammartist myself.

Sikecon wrote:

dhuls wrote:

support, I see no reason why it shouldn't be allowed.

Do you mean, "I see no reason why it should be allowed"?
I understand bad grammar, because I'm a bad grammartist myself.

He means “I see no reason why it shouldn't be allowed.”
What you just said means the exact opposite of what he's trying to get across. I can definitely tell you're a bad grammarist it shows

reallysoftuser wrote:

Sikecon wrote:

-snip-

He means “I see no reason why it shouldn't be allowed.”
What you just said means the exact opposite of what he's trying to get across. I can definitely tell you're a bad grammarist it shows

offense slightly taken
Oh, ok.

I just went on deviant art. After a look, I’m like, how is this not blocked? 18+ pictures, unmoderated chat. This should defo be completely back listed

Support, my school blocks it.
======================
What about Toyhouse? Many users use that in conjunction w/ Scratch to do things.

lm1996 wrote:

Support, my school blocks it.
======================
What about Toyhouse? Many users use that in conjunction w/ Scratch to do things.

toyhou.se is already banned, but not blacklisted. many people don't know it's not allowed though, and since it's a normal word in English I'm not sure if the st would blacklist it

lm1996 wrote:

Support, my school blocks it.
======================
What about Toyhouse? Many users use that in conjunction w/ Scratch to do things.

Toyhou.se has moderated chat, and you can only see certain things based on your age last I heard

Everyone's supporting this topic, so I'm gonna bring down some reasons against it, because a good suggestion needs criticism.

First off, as aforementioned, you need an account to view everything NSFW. I'm also pretty sure that you need an account to access private messaging.

And unless the pictures/webcomics are incorrectly marked not as NSFW or 13+ (though I'm sure DeviantArt is already 13+), there isn't much issue.

I also see no issues with commissioning (unless its for money), which happens all the time on scratch.

Yellowsheep43 wrote:

Everyone's supporting this topic, so I'm gonna bring down some reasons against it, because a good suggestion needs criticism.

First off, as aforementioned, you need an account to view everything NSFW. I'm also pretty sure that you need an account to access private messaging.

And unless the pictures/webcomics are incorrectly marked not as NSFW or 13+ (though I'm sure DeviantArt is already 13+), there isn't much issue.

I also see no issues with commissioning (unless its for money), which happens all the time on scratch.

Yeah, it isn´t money. Its ¨points¨

-0Nebula0- wrote:

Yeah, it isn´t money. Its ¨points¨

In which case I see no issue, account or no account.

Yellowsheep43 wrote:

-0Nebula0- wrote:

Yeah, it isn´t money. Its ¨points¨

In which case I see no issue, account or no account.

True, but it is still not good, because some things are SFW, but you can see comments and users, which might contain NSFW things

-0Nebula0- wrote:

True, but it is still not good, because some things are SFW, but you can see comments and users, which might contain NSFW things

And remember: You need an account to view NSFW content on there.

Yellowsheep43 wrote:

-0Nebula0- wrote:

Yeah, it isn´t money. Its ¨points¨

In which case I see no issue, account or no account.

I'm pretty sure da points cost money, and I've seen many artists that link their PayPal.

Yellowsheep43 wrote:

Everyone's supporting this topic, so I'm gonna bring down some reasons against it, because a good suggestion needs criticism.

First off, as aforementioned, you need an account to view everything NSFW. I'm also pretty sure that you need an account to access private messaging.

And unless the pictures/webcomics are incorrectly marked not as NSFW or 13+ (though I'm sure DeviantArt is already 13+), there isn't much issue.

I also see no issues with commissioning (unless its for money), which happens all the time on scratch.

I've seen inappropriate art on there without having an account (although it mightve just been through search results, can't remember.) , plus people swear on there a lot.
also, I'm pretty sure that there is another version of the mature content filter that only puts a warning.

dhuls wrote:

support, I see no reason why it shouldn't be allowed.

Classic double negative mistake. Anyways, yeah, it should be blacklisted because I’m pretty sure it’s already banned.