RokCoder wrote:

DieForrobux_New wrote:

3). When I selected the download file, scratch says that it failed to load.

This is quite the mystery then. When I've tried your profile here it works absolutely fine. I select the profile.sb3 file, it warns me about overwriting the project, I click okay and it loads up fine. I've only tested this on PCs (Windows). What are you running it on?

DieForrobux_New wrote:

My browser / operating system: ChromeOS 13597.94.0, Chrome 88.0.4324.186, No Flash version detected
That's it
It's a laptop btw.

RokCoder wrote:

samq64 wrote:

Is there any way you can add an option so you can choose witch projects you want to appear right from the website instead of putting the #noindex tags on the project notes? This would make it easier so you won't have to go to the project pages of super-old projects just to write #noindex.

Maybe you could put check boxes next to the project names so you can just uncheck the ones you don't want

And earlier you were talking about make automatic custom thumbnails. I think that's a good idea too, but it should be optional. Maybe a check box under the picture that says use custom thumbnail?

The problem with doing it manually is that you'd have to do it again every time you update the project. It's quicker in the long-run to just add #noindex to them the once. I don't know whether I'll add the thumbnail option or not at the moment. If I have time I'll likely do it but it won't be for a few days at least.

samq64 wrote:

You've already made so many improvements to it since it was released a few days ago!

RokCoder wrote:

TheCloudDev wrote:

Bug
https://pasteboard.co/JRbMwnv.png

I tested with your profile here and it worked fine. Can you remember what you'd done when that error popped up? And/or can you try it again please as I may have been updating at the time?
Yep, looks like it's working fine now!

TheCloudDev wrote:

Suggestion - take the project thumbnails via cdn2.scratch.mit.edu, make a GIF and put the gif as the thumbnail.

RokCoder wrote:

DieForrobux_New wrote:

My browser / operating system: ChromeOS 13597.94.0, Chrome 88.0.4324.186, No Flash version detected
That's it
It's a laptop btw.

I'm slightly baffled then. It should work fine. The sb3 file should be 3761kb. Other than that, can you test on a different computer if you get a chance? I genuinely have no idea why it's not working on that machine! Sorry.

DieForrobux_New wrote:

RokCoder wrote:

DieForrobux_New wrote:

My browser / operating system: ChromeOS 13597.94.0, Chrome 88.0.4324.186, No Flash version detected
That's it
It's a laptop btw.

I'm slightly baffled then. It should work fine. The sb3 file should be 3761kb. Other than that, can you test on a different computer if you get a chance? I genuinely have no idea why it's not working on that machine! Sorry.

I'll see if it's 3761kb.

DieForrobux_New wrote:

it has 2.66 MB. Idk what it means.
Same thing for my brother

RokCoder wrote:

I'm slightly baffled then. It should work fine. The sb3 file should be 3761kb. Other than that, can you test on a different computer if you get a chance? I genuinely have no idea why it's not working on that machine! Sorry.

samq64 wrote:

I found a bug with the color sliders on Windows 10, they slide horizontally instead of vertically so I can't choose the color:

My browser / operating system: Windows NT 10.0, Firefox 86.0, No Flash version detected

Edit: The bug is only on Firefox. On Microsoft Edge works fine.
Edit 2: The sliders still work, just they're tiny and horizontal.

RokCoder wrote:

samq64 wrote:

I found a bug with the color sliders on Windows 10, they slide horizontally instead of vertically so I can't choose the
My browser / operating system: Windows NT 10.0, Firefox 86.0, No Flash version detected
-snip-
Edit: The bug is only on Firefox. On Microsoft Edge works fine.
Edit 2: The sliders still work, just they're tiny and horizontal.

Thanks for the report and screenshots - that's the best type of bug report (clear, accurate and descriptive). It was a nightmare implementing the vertical sliders as every browser seems to handle them differently. I'm afraid this might be a bug that stays. Apologies.

hmadden58 wrote:

I am having an issue where the website won't re look at my details(i realized I hadn't properly hash tagged my games but the website picks up no new details after I reloaded it, went incognito, it just didn't update which is unfortunate)

samq64 wrote:

Thanks! The strange thing is the sliders worked on that browser two days ago. They only started doing that yesterday.

RokCoder wrote:

samq64 wrote:

Thanks! The strange thing is the sliders worked on that browser two days ago. They only started doing that yesterday.

That was a lot harder to fix than expected. Oh for a little more compatibility between browsers…