TimothyLawyer wrote:

requested before

Blur Effect

Cachaca wrote:

Unfortunately, scratch still doesn't have it.

TimothyLawyer wrote:

Cachaca wrote:

Unfortunately, scratch still doesn't have it.

Scratch used to have it and they took it out.

Scratchers then created their own blur effects with existing blocks.

CatsUnited wrote:

TimothyLawyer wrote:

Cachaca wrote:

Unfortunately, scratch still doesn't have it.

Scratch used to have it and they took it out.

Scratchers then created their own blur effects with existing blocks.

I heard in 1.2 they had blur along with saturation which changed the amount of colour in the sprite/stage and a pontillize effect or something like that which puts circles of the sprites' colours in random areas of the sprite, which can simulate rain. There is also a water ripple effect, but Scratch just crashes because Squeak doesn't have enough memory to execute it.

Cachaca wrote:

CatsUnited wrote:

TimothyLawyer wrote:

Cachaca wrote:

Unfortunately, scratch still doesn't have it.

Scratch used to have it and they took it out.

Scratchers then created their own blur effects with existing blocks.

I heard in 1.2 they had blur along with saturation which changed the amount of colour in the sprite/stage and a pontillize effect or something like that which puts circles of the sprites' colours in random areas of the sprite, which can simulate rain. There is also a water ripple effect, but Scratch just crashes because Squeak doesn't have enough memory to execute it.

Oh…

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

NoxSpooth wrote:

Hm…

I think this would be significantly laggier than any other effect on Scratch. I may be wrong, though?


Eh, no support for now.

I thought stage3d was gpu accelerated, so no, I don't think this will lag at all

set blur effect to (0) [within rectangle v]::looks
set blur effect to (0) [spread out v]::looks

DrKat123 wrote:

Ok, the ST's already Rejected this idea.
There's a scratch wiki page about that. So no support

DrKat123 wrote:

Ok, the ST's already Rejected this idea.
There's a scratch wiki page about that. So no support

DaSpudLord wrote:

DrKat123 wrote:

Ok, the ST's already Rejected this idea.
There's a scratch wiki page about that. So no support

They have? I don't see it in the rejected ideas sticky… Source?

Zekrom01 wrote:

DaSpudLord wrote:

DrKat123 wrote:

Ok, the ST's already Rejected this idea.
There's a scratch wiki page about that. So no support

They have? I don't see it in the rejected ideas sticky… Source?

It's not rejected.
There was a blur effect back in 1.2. However, the ST had removed it because it was glitchy.

DaSpudLord wrote:

Zekrom01 wrote:

DaSpudLord wrote:

DrKat123 wrote:

Ok, the ST's already Rejected this idea.
There's a scratch wiki page about that. So no support

They have? I don't see it in the rejected ideas sticky… Source?

It's not rejected.
There was a blur effect back in 1.2. However, the ST had removed it because it was glitchy.

Oh. Well, support if it can be made not glitchy.

Zekrom01 wrote:

DaSpudLord wrote:

Zekrom01 wrote:

DaSpudLord wrote:

DrKat123 wrote:

Ok, the ST's already Rejected this idea.
There's a scratch wiki page about that. So no support

They have? I don't see it in the rejected ideas sticky… Source?

It's not rejected.
There was a blur effect back in 1.2. However, the ST had removed it because it was glitchy.

Oh. Well, support if it can be made not glitchy.

Agreed.

Zekrom01 wrote:

DaSpudLord wrote:

Zekrom01 wrote:

DaSpudLord wrote:

DrKat123 wrote:

Ok, the ST's already Rejected this idea.
There's a scratch wiki page about that. So no support

They have? I don't see it in the rejected ideas sticky… Source?

It's not rejected.
There was a blur effect back in 1.2. However, the ST had removed it because it was glitchy.

Oh. Well, support if it can be made not glitchy.

Agreed.

set blur to ()::looks

change blur by (...)::looks

set [blur v] effect to ()
change [blur v] effect by ()

stickfiregames wrote:

Support for

set [blur v] effect to ()
change [blur v] effect by ()

It's quite possible that they could make it without being glitchy, since 2.0 is very different from 1.2 when it was removed.