(number) - (round (number))

Vract0 wrote:

Should I make a project with a custom block that acts like that operator?

mybearworld wrote:

Interesting idea.
First I thought that could only be used for getting the decimal points

(number) - (round (number))

But after your listings, I see that there is a workaround, but it's complicated.
So, I support.

when green flag clicked
ask [Give me x and y with a comma] and wait
set [ num v] to (answer)
set [x v] to (section(1) of split(num) on character[,]::operators)
set [y v] to (section(2) of split(num) on character[,]::operators)

sportfan999 wrote:

It may seem a little complicated to beginning Scratchers. Sorry, but no support. I may support it if the block name was easier to read.

mitdk wrote:

sportfan999 wrote:

It may seem a little complicated to beginning Scratchers. Sorry, but no support. I may support it if the block name was easier to read.

or maybe it would make more sense with some fillers in the block menu?

(section(1) of split[apple, banana] on character[,]::operators)

(section( v) of split[] on character()::operators)

(section( v) of split[] on character()::operators)

(section(1 v) of split[a2b2c4jjj] on character(4)::operators)

(section(1) of split[a2b2c4jjj] on character[4]::operators)

ChewingFruitGum wrote:

woah thats just very confusing haha lol XD

(section(1) of split(☁ player 1) on character[4]::operators)

MartianSoil wrote:

I support this because it would make cloud multiplayer just a bit easier to make.
You could do things with this as a feature such as this:

(section(1) of split(☁ player 1) on character[4]::operators)

mitdk wrote:

If you look at this and think this suggestion is the same as this,

(section( v) of split[] on character()::operators)

Here is the difference.

(section( v) of split[] on character()::operators)

this block would be used like this:

(section(1 v) of split[a2b2c4jjj] on character(4)::operators)

output would be:
a2b
for my block:

(section(1) of split[a2b2c4jjj] on character[4]::operators)

output would be:
a2b2c
This is because on my block it is asking for the character to split on, not the character number.

MartianSoil wrote:

I support this because it would make cloud multiplayer just a bit easier to make.
You could do things with this as a feature such as this:

(section(1) of split(☁ player 1) on character[4]::operators)

when green flag clicked
forever
encode(something)::custom
repeat (length of (var))


set [score v] to (join (score) (letter (counter::variables) of (var))
if <(length of (score)) = [256]> then
set [score v] to (join (score) [,]) 
end
end
set [☁ score v] to (section(1) of split(score::variables) on character[,]::operators)
set [☁ score2 v] to (section(2) of split(score::variables) on character[,]::operators)

end

(section() of split() on character()::operators)

mitdk wrote:

MartianSoil wrote:

I support this because it would make cloud multiplayer just a bit easier to make.
You could do things with this as a feature such as this:

(section(1) of split(☁ player 1) on character[4]::operators)

By character 4, do you mean character #4 or the character ‘4’
because i stated the difference on another post

mitdk wrote:

If you look at this and think this suggestion is the same as this,

(section( v) of split[] on character()::operators)

Here is the difference.

(section( v) of split[] on character()::operators)

this block would be used like this:

(section(1 v) of split[a2b2c4jjj] on character(4)::operators)

output would be:
a2b
for my block:

(section(1) of split[a2b2c4jjj] on character[4]::operators)

output would be:
a2b2c
This is because on my block it is asking for the character to split on, not the character number.

MartianSoil wrote:

mitdk wrote:

MartianSoil wrote:

I support this because it would make cloud multiplayer just a bit easier to make.
You could do things with this as a feature such as this:

(section(1) of split(☁ player 1) on character[4]::operators)

By character 4, do you mean character #4 or the character ‘4’
because i stated the difference on another post

mitdk wrote:

If you look at this and think this suggestion is the same as this,

(section( v) of split[] on character()::operators)

Here is the difference.

(section( v) of split[] on character()::operators)

this block would be used like this:

(section(1 v) of split[a2b2c4jjj] on character(4)::operators)

output would be:
a2b
for my block:

(section(1) of split[a2b2c4jjj] on character[4]::operators)

output would be:
a2b2c
This is because on my block it is asking for the character to split on, not the character number.

I mostly just meant that the 4 could be whatever; I just put 4 because I didn’t know which number to put.

p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p- wrote:

I think dupe?

wow