What if I did this though?

change x by (i ::operators)

Would nothing happen or Scratch freak out that it's trying to move something by a non-integer number?

fdreerf wrote:

What if I did this though?

change x by (i ::operators)

Would nothing happen or Scratch freak out that it's trying to move something by a non-integer number?

A weird idea could be that it changes y by 1.

fdreerf wrote:

What if I did this though?

change x by (i ::operators)

Would nothing happen or Scratch freak out that it's trying to move something by a non-integer number?

That's a domain error, not unlike

change x by (join [hello ] [world])

so as long as Scratch ignores domain errors nothing would happen.

Jonathan50 wrote:

fdreerf wrote:

What if I did this though?

change x by (i ::operators)

Would nothing happen or Scratch freak out that it's trying to move something by a non-integer number?

That's a domain error, not unlike

change x by (join [hello ] [world])

so as long as Scratch ignores domain errors nothing would happen.

Oh yeah, forgot about strings.
I was thinking
“Oh no there's no domain error reaction, unlike the repeat block which uses positive and just ignores negative aaaaaaa”
but yeah strings exist

bump

No support, I see no purpose.

earlier topic Make square roots on negitave Numbers exist but closed

bump

its one letter long yet very complex.

minor-edit wrote:

earlier topic Make square roots on negitave Numbers exist but closed

Hey, thanks for finding that link! That topic is closed because this idea is rejected as being out of scope for basic Scratch. I can maybe see it as an extension for advanced users.