Support. It looks fantastic!

Edit: 2nd page.

ihgfedcba wrote:

No support if it will have the same “responsive design” as the previous 3.0 pages.

I mean, pages should always look like this https://i.imgur.com/dPEvuw4.png (Microsoft Windows) or this https://i.imgur.com/ywLsmR7.png (Android)

NOT LIKE THIS https://i.imgur.com/mnylifp.png I mean that's unusable! This is EXTREMELY disrespectful against smartphones!

Yes, complete agreement!

Although even yours needs to be edited, to make the color scheme less blinding.

ihgfedcba wrote:

No support if it will have the same “responsive design” as the previous 3.0 pages.

I mean, pages should always look like this https://i.imgur.com/dPEvuw4.png (Microsoft Windows) or this https://i.imgur.com/ywLsmR7.png (Android)

NOT LIKE THIS https://i.imgur.com/mnylifp.png I mean that's unusable! This is EXTREMELY disrespectful against smartphones!

Can't you zoom out on phones? The point of responsive design is to make the design of the website fit for whatever screen dimension you're on. How are you supposed to fit “what's happening”, “featured projects”, and “news” all in one page without scrolling? It'd be unusable and unreadable.

OTSFan203 wrote:

I do not support this.

The designs are blinding, like what many of the pages on Scratch have turned into. If this was implemented, I would likely have to leave Scratch.

Please keep in mind that those are just mockups.

Nice! Support!
I can see you put lots of work into the mockups, and they're fabulous.
I also think this is a good idea because, right now, the site still looks a bit 2.0ish.

OTSFan203 wrote:

ihgfedcba wrote:

No support if it will have the same “responsive design” as the previous 3.0 pages.

I mean, pages should always look like this https://i.imgur.com/dPEvuw4.png (Microsoft Windows) or this https://i.imgur.com/ywLsmR7.png (Android)

NOT LIKE THIS https://i.imgur.com/mnylifp.png I mean that's unusable! This is EXTREMELY disrespectful against smartphones!

Yes, complete agreement!

Although even yours needs to be edited, to make the color scheme less blinding.

Those screenshots are unmodified pages on my devices.

NilsTheBest wrote:

ihgfedcba wrote:

No support if it will have the same “responsive design” as the previous 3.0 pages.

I mean, pages should always look like this https://i.imgur.com/dPEvuw4.png (Microsoft Windows) or this https://i.imgur.com/ywLsmR7.png (Android)

NOT LIKE THIS https://i.imgur.com/mnylifp.png I mean that's unusable! This is EXTREMELY disrespectful against smartphones!

Can't you zoom out on phones? The point of responsive design is to make the design of the website fit for whatever screen dimension you're on. How are you supposed to fit “what's happening”, “featured projects”, and “news” all in one page without scrolling? It'd be unusable and unreadable.

The way zooming works on Android prevents zooming out on “responsive design”. Without “responsive design”, I can get the same experience on all of my devices instead of feeling left out when using a phone. Pages that don't use “responsive design”, such as YouTube and Wikipedia, look like normal on a phone, but scaled down to the screen; by the way zooming works on Android I can zoom in for close-up view. I mean, although phones are smaller they are read from a closer distance, and this is compensated by not using “responsive design”.

The difference in zooming:
In Microsoft Windows, it changes the scale factor, but leaves the virtual window width the same. This way zooming can switch between the regular mode and the responsive mode.
In Android, it changes the scale factor and also changes the virtual window width proportionally. This way zooming is a close-up at the page. But it's impossible to zoom out so outwards the virtual window width goes below the actual device width.

Bump (For reasons)

Support! Can you also choose your profile page color from a color palette?

Hmm, I don't know. I like a few things, but I think this makes the website look a bit too childish. This is just my opinion, though.

I can't really support this because I do not support material/metro/flat design, but amazing effort!

I don't really think the forums fit (the forums are meant to be complex), and the My Stuff page could do with some improvement, but I like the profile page - it reminds me of 1.x.

ihgfedcba wrote:

A major flaw of the Scratch 3.0 theme is that it's unusable on mobile phones due to “responsive design”.

Is that what they're calling it this nanosecond? I thought the current name for it was “fluent” design.

-Rex- wrote:

I don't really like the removal of the topics, posts, and last post information from the forum page or the “See inside” buttom from My stuff. Add those, and I wouldn't have any issues with your mock-ups.

This exactly.

The new 3.0 pages are missing a lot of links to some features. The features still exist - but they're not linked anywhere. Like the Remix Tree, for example.

This new design should be added.

Support!

Support!

100% supported

AnimeDetective wrote:

This new design should be added.

DANISON wrote:

Support!

Robby_Blue wrote:

Support!

MinersTrove101 wrote:

100% supported

Please explain why.

Support, and I love the mockups! However, @–Snowball– has a point. Some people dislike the design of 3.0 because it looks more childish. Some of these people would not like the new Scratch design for the same reason.

Really Nice designs! Support

VFDan wrote:

Support!

AY

dude341 wrote:

~snip~
Please explain why.

Total support for the “My Stuff” page and most of the profile page (some of the stuff looks too much like 2.0 to really fly with the design).

The forum mockups seem kind of large which isn't as practical for this form of communication.