Dinosaur3 sprite in scratch 3.0 deeply offends me

PrincessPanda_test_

Let's just suppose that the dinosaurs despicted with the sprites were artificially created through both dinosaur and current animal DNA.

I read too much about Jurassic World yesterday.

Lythr0nax

PrincessPanda_test_ wrote:
Let's just suppose that the dinosaurs despicted with the sprites were artificially created through both dinosaur and current animal DNA.

I read too much about Jurassic World yesterday.

where'd they even get dinosaur DNA
there's no way DNA would preserve for that long
and pterosaurs still aren't dinosaurs
and why'd you even bring that up

the book was better

Last edited by Lythr0nax (June 18, 2018 09:09:29)

PrincessPanda_test_

Lythr0nax wrote:
PrincessPanda_test_ wrote:
Let's just suppose that the dinosaurs despicted with the sprites were artificially created through both dinosaur and current animal DNA.

I read too much about Jurassic World yesterday.

where'd they even get dinosaur DNA
there's no way DNA would preserve for that long
and pterosaurs still aren't dinosaurs
and why'd you even bring that up

the book was better

“It's science fiction, not a documentary.”

sti_scratch

calulord wrote:
PrincessPandaLover wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artistic_license
I think this is a joke.

Please don’t make joke topics outside of April Folol’s day.

This post is made on JUNE 14. It's June Folol, not April Folol. (imitation of spelling)

TheAdriCoolManDude

People, let's just say Scratch is for coding, not science, so it doesn't matter what you call it, it is just a dang sprite, and as everyone needed to know, Artistic License.

Checkingball

Botcho_Otkho wrote:
They are dinosaurs.
No, they are not, I checked, but that's not a reason to support this. Many people aren't interested in dinosaurs, and this won't generate a problem for them. Let's just say there's a sprite of a Mac called “PC”, it's wrong, but does it generate problems? No. I think you can live normally even if that sprite is called like it should not be called.

Bump- but my inner geek tells me that calling a Mac a “PC” would be a travesty

I'm only half joking

Checkingball

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:
People, let's just say Scratch is for coding, not science, so it doesn't matter what you call it, it is just a dang sprite, and as everyone needed to know, Artistic License.

The good folks over at MIT should understand enough science to not label a pterosaur as a mere “dinosaur3”.

But seriously guys, it's a cartoon character.

cfs_diesn

whos here from TvTropes

Quantum-Cat

As evident from this topic, not many people know that this sprite isn't a dinosaur. Imagine if a kid searches for ‘dinosaur’. They will end up confused, wondering “where did the flying dinosaur go?”

Xolay

cfs_diesn wrote:
whos here from TvTropes

Please don't necropost.

supergirl3212

Support this. I don’t wanna deal with a bunch of angry science nerds - and I say nerds as a high compliment not an insult. But honestly I thought they were. So maybe relabeling it could be educational????

supergirl3212

Quantum-Cat wrote:
As evident from this topic, not many people know that this sprite isn't a dinosaur. Imagine if a kid searches for ‘dinosaur’. They will end up confused, wondering “where did the flying dinosaur go?”

They could just scroll through the animals. It’s that simple.

Suhasini2712

cfs_diesn wrote:
whos here from TvTropes

Meeeeeeeeeee!

Discuss Scratch