Collaborations(*Too many to count* Supporters)

Lythium

_Comicfan_ wrote:
Support. Scratch needs a better collab system, the current one is….. How should I say this? Bad.

How? Remixing is actually better than this, as you can see a log of all the variosu changes your collaboration has done. Plus, you have backup versions.

Sigton wrote:
Lythium wrote:
No support
But it's not live editing; it's still the regular form of editing that can be done by multiple users.
I mighta have already done this, but full support!

Sigton

Not at the same time. Scratch cannot handle that.

bigpuppy

Support

Lythium

bigpuppy wrote:
Support

It's already been rejected by the sticky.

bigpuppy

Lythium wrote:
bigpuppy wrote:
Support
It's already been rejected by the sticky.

Well, for this, everyone can see it.

-raspberry_

Support!

Sheep_maker

Can the other editors remix the project they are collaborating on?

MathlyCat

Lythium wrote:
_Comicfan_ wrote:
Support. Scratch needs a better collab system, the current one is….. How should I say this? Bad.
How? Remixing is actually better than this, as you can see a log of all the variosu changes your collaboration has done. Plus, you have backup versions.

Sigton wrote:
Lythium wrote:
No support
But it's not live editing; it's still the regular form of editing that can be done by multiple users.
I mighta have already done this, but full support!

Sigton
Not at the same time. Scratch cannot handle that.

I don't think you understand how the suggestion works. It's not live editing at all.

1. It's sort of like remixing a project, except, you don't have to do that and can add recursive changes.
2. So not only does in general save Scratch space (not that it matters

) but it also keeps one nice clean project., that can be reverted when need be.
3. It doesn't allow 2 peoples to edit the same project, yet however, allows them to edit their own separate versions. The only “live” part about it is that their editing the project in a regular editor.

Full support.

Gobblesmack

Support - this would improve collabing a ton

JACsterandOlibob

Support IF You don't do it this way. What would happen if 2 or more people tried to edit at once? Will it be a bit like G+docs?

f1lip

No support, this has something to do with live editing which is already rejected.

MathlyCat

JACsterandOlibob wrote:
Support IF You don't do it this way. What would happen if 2 or more people tried to edit at once? Will it be a bit like G+docs?

Each editing sension was separate (if you read the topic my friends

), so you could choose which save to use.

f1lip wrote:
No support, this has something to do with live editing which is already rejected.

It's not live editing, you misunderstood the suggestion:

MathlyCat wrote:
Lythium wrote:
_Comicfan_ wrote:
Support. Scratch needs a better collab system, the current one is….. How should I say this? Bad.
How? Remixing is actually better than this, as you can see a log of all the variosu changes your collaboration has done. Plus, you have backup versions.

Sigton wrote:
Lythium wrote:
No support
But it's not live editing; it's still the regular form of editing that can be done by multiple users.
I mighta have already done this, but full support!

Sigton
Not at the same time. Scratch cannot handle that.

I don't think you understand how the suggestion works. It's not live editing at all.

1. It's sort of like remixing a project, except, you don't have to do that and can add recursive changes.
2. So not only does in general save Scratch space (not that it matters ) but it also keeps one nice clean project., that can be reverted when need be.
3. It doesn't allow 2 peoples to edit the same project, yet however, allows them to edit their own separate versions. The only “live” part about it is that their editing the project in a regular editor.

Full support.

bigpuppy

MathlyCat wrote:
Lythium wrote:
_Comicfan_ wrote:
Support. Scratch needs a better collab system, the current one is….. How should I say this? Bad.
How? Remixing is actually better than this, as you can see a log of all the variosu changes your collaboration has done. Plus, you have backup versions.

Sigton wrote:
Lythium wrote:
No support
But it's not live editing; it's still the regular form of editing that can be done by multiple users.
I mighta have already done this, but full support!

Sigton
Not at the same time. Scratch cannot handle that.

I don't think you understand how the suggestion works. It's not live editing at all.

1. It's sort of like remixing a project, except, you don't have to do that and can add recursive changes.
2. So not only does in general save Scratch space (not that it matters ) but it also keeps one nice clean project., that can be reverted when need be.
3. It doesn't allow 2 peoples to edit the same project, yet however, allows them to edit their own separate versions. The only “live” part about it is that their editing the project in a regular editor.

Full support.

Thank you for explaining it to everyone, I don't think they understood.

MathlyCat

bigpuppy wrote:
MathlyCat wrote:
snips
Thank you for explaining it to everyone, I don't think they understood.

It's what happens when people don't read the original post. Honestly, it's literally bashing on an idea.

ateesdalejr

YEY! Almost like my merge request suggestion! Support! This is almost like github's project management scheme. It would make sticking changes back into the original project so much easier!

Last edited by ateesdalejr (Oct. 17, 2016 13:46:56)

Digital_Gaming

Support. This would make making colab projects way easier.

BlazeStudios

Should I bump? Ok bump.

mr-scratch-cat

Sounds pretty good. I'm not sure how the ST will feel about this though.

WolfCat67

I haven't supported this yet? Wow, I'll have to get on to that…

Support! This is a really great addition to the website. The ideas are laid out really well, and it's really easy to understand. I can't see any problems with it. Though I may not use it too much, as I prefer the other way of making a bunch of separate stuff, backpacking it and putting it into one main project, and continuing with that process.

Scratch-Adventures

Support! Scratch has a terrible collaboration system right now, and nothing has been done about it!

Edit: you could also use a smart system (like GitHub's) to merge changes made at the same time, via storing additions and deletions rather than the new project

Last edited by Scratch-Adventures (Nov. 1, 2017 20:16:57)

elevatorman2007

pleeeease make it happen scratch team! please!

Discuss Scratch