instead of

go to x: () y: ()

do

set x to ()
set y to ()

instead of

go to [mouse pointer]

do

set x to (mouse x)
set y to (mouse y)

No support, its for new scratchers

Multiplication is workaroundable, so should we take that out as well? No support.

No Support, it's quite useful even for the most advanced scratchers.

Are you trolling? You seem to be fixated on removing every block that has a workaround for some reason.

Well, we should remove ALL the workaroundable blocks! Is that what you're saying?
No support, PLEASE.

NO SUPPORT!!!!!

Sonickyle wrote:

Are you trolling? You seem to be fixated on removing every block that has a workaround for some reason.

Please don't be offensive like that to people!

GIVE HIM/HER RESPECT

I no support this but I will start reporting anyone who starts disrespecting this user!

iamunknown2 wrote:

Multiplication is workaroundable, so should we take that out as well? No support.

No support per this.

No support. Also, your workarounds don't work if the pen is down.

MathlyCat wrote:

Sonickyle wrote:

Are you trolling? You seem to be fixated on removing every block that has a workaround for some reason.

Please don't be offensive like that to people!

GIVE HIM/HER RESPECT

I no support this but I will start reporting anyone who starts disrespecting this user!

No need to make a public display of it - please just report quietly instead of making a fuss and we'll look at it.

The same goes for people you think are trolling - please be respectful and assume the best when you're responding to people. If you really think that they're not being genuine and causing a disruption, then report it.

I have another idea: do the opposite!

//Get rid of these!
set x to ()
set y to ()
//Workaround:
go to x: (x position) y: ()
go to x: () y: (y position)

My workarounds solve the pen problem:

stickfiregames wrote:

No support. Also, your workarounds don't work if the pen is down.

EDIT: I case you didn't realize, I was being sarcastic.

[sarcasm] If those have such easy workarounds that we should delete them, let's also delete this block!

if <> then
    
else

end

It has a workaround! Then we can delete this one!

wait (1) secs

And then this one!

when [ v] key pressed

Then we can remove every workaroundable block!

[/sarcasm] No support.

Chibi-Matoran wrote:

I have another idea: do the opposite!

//Get rid of these!
set x to ()
set y to ()
//Workaround:
go to x: (x position) y: ()
go to x: () y: (y position)

My workarounds solve the pen problem:

stickfiregames wrote:

No support. Also, your workarounds don't work if the pen is down.

EDIT: I case you didn't realize, I was being sarcastic.

i'd rather do this

No support.

Say you want to use pen, right?
Let's pretend that we're at (0, 0).
We want to draw a diagonal line to (100, 100).

go to x: (100) y: (1000)

Ta-da!
If you did

set x to (100)
set y to (100)

then you'd get an L - first it would go straight across to (100, 0) then straight up to (100, 100).

In fact, the

go to x: () y: ()

is the ONLY block you need to move around. (Ignoring gliding)

I prove my case:

set x to (10) //Instead of this...
go to x: (10) y: (y position) //Do this

set y to (10) //Instead of this...
go to x: (x position) y: (10) //Do this

change x by (10) //Instead of this...
go to x: ((x position) + (10)) y: (y position) //Do this (You can use the [minus] operator for going left)

change y by (10) //Finally, instead of this...
go to x: (x position) y: ((10) + (y position)) //Do this (Use [minus] operator for moving downwards)

I rest my case.

KryptykProductions wrote:

No support.

Say you want to use pen, right?
Let's pretend that we're at (0, 0).
We want to draw a diagonal line to (100, 100).

go to x: (100) y: (1000)

Ta-da!
If you did

set x to (100)
set y to (100)

then you'd get an L - first it would go straight across to (100, 0) then straight up to (100, 100).

In fact, the

go to x: () y: ()

is the ONLY block you need to move around. (Ignoring gliding)

I prove my case:

set x to (10) //Instead of this...
go to x: (10) y: (y position) //Do this

set y to (10) //Instead of this...
go to x: (x position) y: (10) //Do this

change x by (10) //Instead of this...
go to x: ((x position) + (10)) y: (y position) //Do this (You can use the [minus] operator for going left)

change y by (10) //Finally, instead of this...
go to x: (x position) y: ((10) + (y position)) //Do this (Use [minus] operator for moving downwards)

I rest my case.

i never used pen, so what does it do?

iamunknown2 wrote:

Multiplication is workaroundable, so should we take that out as well? No support.

yeah.

scrooge200 wrote:

[sarcasm] If those have such easy workarounds that we should delete them, let's also delete this block!

if <> then
    
else

end

It has a workaround! Then we can delete this one!

wait (1) secs

And then this one!

when [ v] key pressed

Then we can remove every workaroundable block!

[/sarcasm] No support.

by that logic we should also remove this block:

move (10) steps

because it has a workaround

no support

gamebeater187_tutor wrote:

KryptykProductions wrote:

No support.

Say you want to use pen, right?
Let's pretend that we're at (0, 0).
We want to draw a diagonal line to (100, 100).

go to x: (100) y: (1000)

Ta-da!
If you did

set x to (100)
set y to (100)

then you'd get an L - first it would go straight across to (100, 0) then straight up to (100, 100).

In fact, the

go to x: () y: ()

is the ONLY block you need to move around. (Ignoring gliding)

I prove my case:

set x to (10) //Instead of this...
go to x: (10) y: (y position) //Do this

set y to (10) //Instead of this...
go to x: (x position) y: (10) //Do this

change x by (10) //Instead of this...
go to x: ((x position) + (10)) y: (y position) //Do this (You can use the [minus] operator for going left)

change y by (10) //Finally, instead of this...
go to x: (x position) y: ((10) + (y position)) //Do this (Use [minus] operator for moving downwards)

I rest my case.

i never used pen, so what does it do?

Go try it in the editor.
It draws a line, tracing the movement of a sprite, and can be used to make really complex projects.
Examples: this and this

KryptykProductions wrote:

gamebeater187_tutor wrote:

KryptykProductions wrote:

No support.

Say you want to use pen, right?
Let's pretend that we're at (0, 0).
We want to draw a diagonal line to (100, 100).

go to x: (100) y: (1000)

Ta-da!
If you did

set x to (100)
set y to (100)

then you'd get an L - first it would go straight across to (100, 0) then straight up to (100, 100).

In fact, the

go to x: () y: ()

is the ONLY block you need to move around. (Ignoring gliding)

I prove my case:

set x to (10) //Instead of this...
go to x: (10) y: (y position) //Do this

set y to (10) //Instead of this...
go to x: (x position) y: (10) //Do this

change x by (10) //Instead of this...
go to x: ((x position) + (10)) y: (y position) //Do this (You can use the [minus] operator for going left)

change y by (10) //Finally, instead of this...
go to x: (x position) y: ((10) + (y position)) //Do this (Use [minus] operator for moving downwards)

I rest my case.

i never used pen, so what does it do?

Go try it in the editor.
It draws a line, tracing the movement of a sprite, and can be used to make really complex projects.
Examples: this and this

I used it and understand it. Use glide block. Then delete the go to block