Bump

This has already been declined.

6.1 Delete or edit your comments everywhere wrote:

The inability to delete your comments everywhere is put in place so users do not post inappropriate comments or spam comments on other users' profiles, projects, or studios, just to delete them later on. In contrast, you are not really likely to spam your own projects or profile. The only benefits to this are to remove comments that you did not mean to post and to fix spelling errors. The former could be solved by thinking carefully before posting any comments, and the latter could be worked around by typing slowly and/or stating your mistakes in a reply to the comment. This also applies to forum posts; that is, a feature for Scratchers to delete their own forum posts will not be implemented.

Editing comments could similarly lead to comment manipulation, such as a user commenting “I like this project,” waiting until someone replies with “I agree,” and then editing the original comment to say “I hate this project.” Allowing Scratch Team members to view the edit history of a comment does not make it easy to moderate, since then they have to look carefully at the context of each edit, which takes time.

This is in the sticky, The Official List of Rejected Suggestions.

CqCodes wrote:

This has already been declined.
-snip-

Nope, that's not what this is suggesting. Read the OP again. They meant messages in here.

DarthVader4Life wrote:

CqCodes wrote:

This has already been declined.
-snip-

Nope, that's not what this is suggesting. Read the OP again. They meant messages in here.

Ok, the answer is still fairly simple. HIT THE CANCEL BUTTON

CqCodes wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

CqCodes wrote:

This has already been declined.
-snip-

Nope, that's not what this is suggesting. Read the OP again. They meant messages in here.

Ok, the answer is still fairly simple. HIT THE CANCEL BUTTON

What cancel button?

NormalMaker wrote:

CqCodes wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

CqCodes wrote:

This has already been declined.
-snip-

Nope, that's not what this is suggesting. Read the OP again. They meant messages in here.

Ok, the answer is still fairly simple. HIT THE CANCEL BUTTON

What cancel button?

The one when making a comment… I think.

CqCodes wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

CqCodes wrote:

This has already been declined.
-snip-

Nope, that's not what this is suggesting. Read the OP again. They meant messages in here.

Ok, the answer is still fairly simple. HIT THE CANCEL BUTTON

[s]Really? I guess all of humanity's problems are solved! Oh wait…[/s]
But really though, how is that going to do what this suggestion entails?
(People are rather unreliable, so don't counter with people can just not comment.)

DarthVader4Life wrote:

CqCodes wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

CqCodes wrote:

This has already been declined.
-snip-

Nope, that's not what this is suggesting. Read the OP again. They meant messages in here.

Ok, the answer is still fairly simple. HIT THE CANCEL BUTTON

[s]Really? I guess all of humanity's problems are solved! Oh wait…[/s]
But really though, how is that going to do what this suggestion entails?
(People are rather unreliable, so don't counter with people can just not comment.)

See, the reason this would be declined would be if someone gets mad for not view their message because it was “deleted”, that would not end well. Besides, ignoring it is the best thing possible. If it breaks community guidelines, this may discourage people from reporting and just delete the message.

CqCodes wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

CqCodes wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

CqCodes wrote:

This has already been declined.
-snip-

Nope, that's not what this is suggesting. Read the OP again. They meant messages in here.

Ok, the answer is still fairly simple. HIT THE CANCEL BUTTON

[s]Really? I guess all of humanity's problems are solved! Oh wait…[/s]
But really though, how is that going to do what this suggestion entails?
(People are rather unreliable, so don't counter with people can just not comment.)

See, the reason this would be declined would be if someone gets mad for not view their message because it was “deleted”, that would not end well. Besides, ignoring it is the best thing possible. If it breaks community guidelines, this may discourage people from reporting and just delete the message.

People mean deleting the message from your inbox. Not the other way around.

han614698 wrote:

CqCodes wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

CqCodes wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

CqCodes wrote:

This has already been declined.
-snip-

Nope, that's not what this is suggesting. Read the OP again. They meant messages in here.

Ok, the answer is still fairly simple. HIT THE CANCEL BUTTON

[s]Really? I guess all of humanity's problems are solved! Oh wait…[/s]
But really though, how is that going to do what this suggestion entails?
(People are rather unreliable, so don't counter with people can just not comment.)

See, the reason this would be declined would be if someone gets mad for not view their message because it was “deleted”, that would not end well. Besides, ignoring it is the best thing possible. If it breaks community guidelines, this may discourage people from reporting and just delete the message.

People mean deleting the message from your inbox. Not the other way around.

Yeah, just going to say that. Please read the OP before posting this suggestion is to remove (most likely spam) messages from your inbox to make it cleaner, and so you can find certain messages again without scrolling through hundreds of studio activity messages. It also helps scratchers check their inbox quicker, by deleting necessary ones

Also just FYI if someone says “support” it normally means they agree with your idea or have positive feelings about your post

Guys, I did.

SomeRandomScratchGuy wrote:

Also just FYI if someone says “support” it normally means they agree with your idea or have positive feelings about your post

We know, and that by itself is not allowed anymore. One must now explain why.

CqCodes wrote:

Guys, I did.

I can see how you managed to misunderstand the OP initially, but insisting that it's rejected (even when it's not) despite multiple people correcting you?

picklehazard wrote:

CatsUnited wrote:

Support.

AND WHAT DO YOU GUYS MEAN BY “SUPPORT”?

They support the suggestion.

hiPeeps124816 wrote:

picklehazard wrote:

CatsUnited wrote:

Support.

AND WHAT DO YOU GUYS MEAN BY “SUPPORT”?

They support the suggestion.

Why did you reply to an old post?

DarthVader4Life wrote:

hiPeeps124816 wrote:

picklehazard wrote:

CatsUnited wrote:

Support.

AND WHAT DO YOU GUYS MEAN BY “SUPPORT”?

They support the suggestion.

Why did you reply to an old post?

Why are you complaining about it? It's acceptable to reply to an old post.

XCartooonX wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

hiPeeps124816 wrote:

picklehazard wrote:

CatsUnited wrote:

Support.

AND WHAT DO YOU GUYS MEAN BY “SUPPORT”?

They support the suggestion.

Why did you reply to an old post?

Why are you complaining about it? It's acceptable to reply to an old post.

But how effective is answering a question when the recipient user isn't going to see it?
And I don't recall it being acceptable to reply to an old post for that reason. If you want to answer it for any future users that want an answer to the question, just state so.

Support.messages that you find annoying could be deleted instead of asking ST

Bump