Can you decode this? (3.5) {LEADERBOARD FINALLY AVAILABLE}

SpyCoderX

co0lcr34t10ns wrote:
(#120)
SpyCoderX wrote:
kRxZy_kRxZy wrote:
(#117)
57 65 6J 6J 20 64 6M 6L 65 21 20 59 6M 75 20 73 6M 6J 76 65 64 20 74 68 69 73 21 20
Solved!
Solution below:
Mpyza, P svvwlk vcly lhjo johyhjaly. Pm aol johyhjaly dhz h ubtily P zopmalk aol ubtily av aol slma if 7.
Zljvuk, P yhu aol ylzbsa vm aol wylcpvbz zalw aoyvbno h olepkljpths av hzjpp kljvkly.
(Yes, its a hidden solution since its only been a day and I want to let others try solving it )
There probably is more steps since it's gibberish

What do you mean?
Edit: King of the page

Last edited by SpyCoderX (Feb. 19, 2025 13:29:55)

kRxZy_kRxZy

BigNate469 wrote:
kRxZy_kRxZy wrote:
50_scratch_tabs wrote:
Check out my new experimental website for this topic! https://50-scratch-tabs.github.io/CanYouDecodeThisCiphers/cipher/
Instead of Git Pages use a website called Netlify for free 24/7 Web hosting.
Why? What's the advantage to doing so?

GitHub Pages already offers free 24/7 hosting, unless GitHub's servers go down (in which case there are larger issues than your GitHub Pages site- the world's largest repository of code is down).

With Github the link to the website will either be USERNAME.github.io or USERNAME.github.io/REPOSITORY whereas in Netlfiy you can just use something.netlify.app, in netlify you can link a git repo and if you change something in the repo the website will update in 30 secs whereas it takes like up to 10 mins in Github. There is not much difference.

kRxZy_kRxZy

SpyCoderX wrote:
co0lcr34t10ns wrote:
(#120)
SpyCoderX wrote:
kRxZy_kRxZy wrote:
(#117)
57 65 6J 6J 20 64 6M 6L 65 21 20 59 6M 75 20 73 6M 6J 76 65 64 20 74 68 69 73 21 20
Solved!
Solution below:
Mpyza, P svvwlk vcly lhjo johyhjaly. Pm aol johyhjaly dhz h ubtily P zopmalk aol ubtily av aol slma if 7.
Zljvuk, P yhu aol ylzbsa vm aol wylcpvbz zalw aoyvbno h olepkljpths av hzjpp kljvkly.
(Yes, its a hidden solution since its only been a day and I want to let others try solving it )
There probably is more steps since it's gibberish
What do you mean?
Edit: King of the page

That's not the answer there is two steps, I'll reveal the first step soon

SpyCoderX

kRxZy_kRxZy wrote:
(#123)
SpyCoderX wrote:
co0lcr34t10ns wrote:
(#120)
SpyCoderX wrote:
kRxZy_kRxZy wrote:
(#117)
57 65 6J 6J 20 64 6M 6L 65 21 20 59 6M 75 20 73 6M 6J 76 65 64 20 74 68 69 73 21 20
Solved!
Solution below:
Mpyza, P svvwlk vcly lhjo johyhjaly. Pm aol johyhjaly dhz h ubtily P zopmalk aol ubtily av aol slma if 7.
Zljvuk, P yhu aol ylzbsa vm aol wylcpvbz zalw aoyvbno h olepkljpths av hzjpp kljvkly.
(Yes, its a hidden solution since its only been a day and I want to let others try solving it )
There probably is more steps since it's gibberish
What do you mean?
Edit: King of the page
That's not the answer there is two steps, I'll reveal the first step soon

Ohhh. No the solution I put was how I got the answer. It wasn't the actual answer. I'll add it to the original post hold on.

kRxZy_kRxZy

SpyCoderX wrote:
kRxZy_kRxZy wrote:
(#123)
SpyCoderX wrote:
co0lcr34t10ns wrote:
(#120)
SpyCoderX wrote:
kRxZy_kRxZy wrote:
(#117)
57 65 6J 6J 20 64 6M 6L 65 21 20 59 6M 75 20 73 6M 6J 76 65 64 20 74 68 69 73 21 20
Solved!
Solution below:
Mpyza, P svvwlk vcly lhjo johyhjaly. Pm aol johyhjaly dhz h ubtily P zopmalk aol ubtily av aol slma if 7.
Zljvuk, P yhu aol ylzbsa vm aol wylcpvbz zalw aoyvbno h olepkljpths av hzjpp kljvkly.
(Yes, its a hidden solution since its only been a day and I want to let others try solving it )
There probably is more steps since it's gibberish
What do you mean?
Edit: King of the page
That's not the answer there is two steps, I'll reveal the first step soon
Ohhh. No the solution I put was how I got the answer. It wasn't the actual answer. I'll add it to the original post hold on.

Yeah your correct, I dint get what you meant at first

50_scratch_tabs

I'm gonna say, I really don't care what the website link is. I'm sticking with GH pages, and that's the end of it.

gilbert_given_189

Cipher:

# Oh no! Whoever sysadmin messed with the hosts file
# forgot to put the actual host names after the IPs...
# Perhaps somebody can do a reverse search on these?
# --hchild

57.144.100.34
44.240.158.19
151.101.66.167
151.101.65.224
172.64.146.247
18.244.51.38
44.205.144.109
104.19.147.91
104.16.25.14
172.64.147.37
207.241.234.205
106.10.248.151
13.107.137.11
104.16.133.229
40.99.33.178
13.107.42.14

Description: Hale decided to look at /etc/hosts and found this
(inspired by this ciphertext *smiley face*)

Last edited by gilbert_given_189 (Feb. 19, 2025 16:33:35)

davidtheplatform

Reposting from the other topic since nobody solved it there.
Second hint (first is in the linked post): [This is a replacement cipher.]
Third hint: [Frequency analysis]

SpyCoderX

davidtheplatform wrote:
(#128)
Reposting from the other topic since nobody solved it there.
Second hint (first is in the linked post): [This is a replacement cipher.]
Third hint: [Frequency analysis]

Is the “corpus” caeser ciphered JavaScript?

davidtheplatform

SpyCoderX wrote:
davidtheplatform wrote:
(#128)
Reposting from the other topic since nobody solved it there.
Second hint (first is in the linked post): [This is a replacement cipher.]
Third hint: [Frequency analysis]
Is the “corpus” caeser ciphered JavaScript?

I'm not really sure what you mean by this, but there isn't any javascript involved.

jumpingtj

Here's mine! I expect this to take a *very* long time for people to get. Encoded in Base64 (you should see this as pure bytes with padding 0s on the end):

SwSwSCSCSCJJfCCDAWPL4EDbiSSSkSUAhcMSUbbbjbbbcAUCUA==

Edit: This should really be in pure binary:

010010110000010010110000010010000010010010000010010010000010001001001001011111000010000010000011000000010110001111001011111000000100000011011011100010010010010010010010100100010010010100000000100001011100001100010010010100011011011011011011100011011011011011011011011100000000010100000010010100

Last edited by jumpingtj (Feb. 21, 2025 12:43:47)

kRxZy_kRxZy

jumpingtj wrote:
Here's mine! I expect this to take a *very* long time for people to get. Encoded in Base64 (you should see this as pure bytes with padding 0s on the end):
SwSwSCSCSCJJfCCDAWPL4EDbiSSSkSUAhcMSUbbbjbbbcAUCUA==

Are you sure this is base 64 cos like this is what i got
Weird answer: K?H$?H"I| ?c??@ۉ$??%???Q?ۍ??pP
Question marks are stuff I didn't get, this is literally Arabic mixed up with English and then some random gibberish

kRxZy_kRxZy

jumpingtj wrote:
Here's mine! I expect this to take a *very* long time for people to get. Encoded in Base64 (you should see this as pure bytes with padding 0s on the end):
SwSwSCSCSCJJfCCDAWPL4EDbiSSSkSUAhcMSUbbbjbbbcAUCUA==

I got a hex representation using python:
Hexadecimal Representation: 4b04b04824824822497c20830163cbe040db89249291250085c31251b6db8db6db70050250

Script:

import base64
def decode_base64(encoded_str):
    # Decode the Base64 encoded string
    try:
        decoded_data = base64.b64decode(encoded_str)
        return decoded_data
    except Exception as e:
        return f"An error occurred: {e}"
# Base64 encoded string
encoded_string = "SwSwSCSCSCJJfCCDAWPL4EDbiSSSkSUAhcMSUbbbjbbbcAUCUA=="
# Decode the string
decoded_result = decode_base64(encoded_string)
# Output the decoded data
print("Decoded Data:", decoded_result)
# Original byte string
byte_string = decoded_result
# Convert the byte string to hexadecimal
hex_representation = byte_string.hex()
# Print the hexadecimal string
print("Hexadecimal Representation:", hex_representation)

jumpingtj

kRxZy_kRxZy wrote:
I got a hex representation using python:
Hexadecimal Representation: 4b04b04824824822497c20830163cbe040db89249291250085c31251b6db8db6db70050250

Yeah this looks good! But you should actually view it as binary… Here's the original:

010010110000010010110000010010000010010010000010010010000010001001001001011111000010000010000011000000010110001111001011111000000100000011011011100010010010010010010010100100010010010100000000100001011100001100010010010100011011011011011011100011011011011011011011011100000000010100000010010100

kRxZy_kRxZy

jumpingtj wrote:
kRxZy_kRxZy wrote:
I got a hex representation using python:
Hexadecimal Representation: 4b04b04824824822497c20830163cbe040db89249291250085c31251b6db8db6db70050250
Yeah this looks good! But you should actually view it as binary… Here's the original:
010010110000010010110000010010000010010010000010010010000010001001001001011111000010000010000011000000010110001111001011111000000100000011011011100010010010010010010010100100010010010100000000100001011100001100010010010100011011011011011011100011011011011011011011011100000000010100000010010100

I can't seem to define it further
I ran another python script and I got:

01001011 = K
00000100 = 4
10110000 = (non-printable)
10010000 = (non-printable)
10010000 = (non-printable)
10010010 = (non-printable)
01001000 = H
10111100 = (non-printable)
10000001 = (non-printable)
00001100 = (non-printable)
00000001 = (non-printable)
01100011 = C
11001011 = (non-printable)
11110000 = (non-printable)
01000000 = (non-printable)
11011011 = (non-printable)
10010010 = (non-printable)
01001001 = I
01001001 = I
10100010 = (non-printable)
01001010 = J

jumpingtj

kRxZy_kRxZy wrote:

I can't seem to define it further
I ran another python script and I got:

01001011 = K
00000100 = 4
10110000 = (non-printable)
10010000 = (non-printable)
10010000 = (non-printable)
10010010 = (non-printable)
01001000 = H
10111100 = (non-printable)
10000001 = (non-printable)
00001100 = (non-printable)
00000001 = (non-printable)
01100011 = C
11001011 = (non-printable)
11110000 = (non-printable)
01000000 = (non-printable)
11011011 = (non-printable)
10010010 = (non-printable)
01001001 = I
01001001 = I
10100010 = (non-printable)
01001010 = J

That's because it's not supposed to be characters - view it as binary.
(Hint: the binary is in chunks that AREN'T bytes)

Discuss Scratch