leogames2016 wrote:

https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/779724/

Not rejected yet

lesphenry-31 wrote:

I propose that we hold a vote to remove certain rejected suggestions.

Scratch is not, and shouldn't be a direct democracy. And besides, regardless of what gets voted to be “unrejected”, it would still not be reconsidered, but the ST would mealy be “forced” to leave its topic up to no benefit.

Catscratcher07 wrote:

lesphenry-31 wrote:

I propose that we hold a vote to remove certain rejected suggestions.

Scratch is not, and shouldn't be a direct democracy. And besides, regardless of what gets voted to be “unrejected”, it would still not be reconsidered, but the ST would mealy be “forced” to leave its topic up to no benefit.

Can you update the list now? Or I could but it would have to be a project

CoderMCProX wrote:

Catscratcher07 wrote:

lesphenry-31 wrote:

I propose that we hold a vote to remove certain rejected suggestions.

Scratch is not, and shouldn't be a direct democracy. And besides, regardless of what gets voted to be “unrejected”, it would still not be reconsidered, but the ST would mealy be “forced” to leave its topic up to no benefit.

Can you update the list now? Or I could but it would have to be a project

Za-chary updates the list roughly every weekend, and your suggestion, which you posted on TOLoRS instead of its own project, isn't common enough to warrant being put on the list.

Scratch emotes aren’t on here, IT MIGHT BE AN ACTUAL THING! _B)_

ph0t0sh0pfl0wey wrote:

Scratch emotes aren’t on here, IT MIGHT BE AN ACTUAL THING! _B)_

that's because scratch isn't like roblox. scratch projects are more like separated universes than a giant universe (which is what roblox is like). it would be impossible to implement emotes everywhere since there are non-game projects here and it is not exactly clear who is the player. however, you can implement emotes in your own projects if you want.

also, just because something isn't on TOLORS doesn't mean it's implemented. dark mode isn't rejected, but isn't implemented.

how is this guide allowed? (I guess this topic shouldn't be here) or is it disallowed? is tolors good?

crazyfrogcat wrote:

how is this guide allowed? (I guess this topic shouldn't be here) or is it disallowed? is tolors good?

Paddle2See wrote:

Hello! It's great that you want to help out other Scratchers. However, I think we have enough guides in the forums at the moment.

square

RSITYTScratch wrote:

(#9549)

crazyfrogcat wrote:

how is this guide allowed? (I guess this topic shouldn't be here) or is it disallowed? is tolors good?

Paddle2See wrote:

Hello! It's great that you want to help out other Scratchers. However, I think we have enough guides in the forums at the moment.

square

so no guides, that equals no tolors

crazyfrogcat wrote:

RSITYTScratch wrote:

(#9549)

crazyfrogcat wrote:

how is this guide allowed? (I guess this topic shouldn't be here) or is it disallowed? is tolors good?

Paddle2See wrote:

Hello! It's great that you want to help out other Scratchers. However, I think we have enough guides in the forums at the moment.

square

so no guides, that equals no tolors

Guides are allowed with ST permission, the rule is no more guides, we have enough, not “no guides”.

Catscratcher07 wrote:

(#9551)

crazyfrogcat wrote:

RSITYTScratch wrote:

(#9549)

crazyfrogcat wrote:

how is this guide allowed? (I guess this topic shouldn't be here) or is it disallowed? is tolors good?

Paddle2See wrote:

Hello! It's great that you want to help out other Scratchers. However, I think we have enough guides in the forums at the moment.

square

so no guides, that equals no tolors

Guides are allowed with ST permission, the rule is no more guides, we have enough, not “no guides”.

then tolors is holy ????

crazyfrogcat wrote:

Catscratcher07 wrote:

(#9551)

crazyfrogcat wrote:

RSITYTScratch wrote:

(#9549)

crazyfrogcat wrote:

how is this guide allowed? (I guess this topic shouldn't be here) or is it disallowed? is tolors good?

Paddle2See wrote:

Hello! It's great that you want to help out other Scratchers. However, I think we have enough guides in the forums at the moment.

square

so no guides, that equals no tolors

Guides are allowed with ST permission, the rule is no more guides, we have enough, not “no guides”.

then tolors is holy ????

TOLORS was created before that rule was put in place.

trolley_explodes wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

-snip-

My post got rejected.

Thanks! It doesn't seem to be a common suggestion, though, so I'll leave it off the list for now.

crazyfrogcat wrote:

I'd like to have to have this topic as 3.7 in the list

I feel like this is already covered in the Community Guidelines. Spam/disrespectful remix chains are not allowed, and otherwise remix chains are allowed because remixes are already allowed.

lesphenry-31 wrote:

I propose that we hold a vote to remove certain rejected suggestions.

If you think there are some that should be removed from this list of rejected suggestions, feel free to let me know and I'll consider it; no vote required. But even if I remove something from the list, that doesn't make it un-rejected.

If instead you want some suggestions to be un-rejected in the first place, I find it unlikely that this would happen. Even if they were un-rejected, that doesn't mean the Scratch Team would implement them. If the Scratch Team never plans to implement a particular suggestion, there's not much of a point of having people discuss it.

leogames2016 wrote:

https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/779724/

This doesn't appear to be rejected.

crazyfrogcat wrote:

how is this guide allowed? (I guess this topic shouldn't be here) or is it disallowed? is tolors good?

If you want to be technical, this iteration of TOLORS was made before the moratorium on guides was placed, so I suppose TOLORS was grandfathered in. The more likely explanation is that TOLORS is useful for Scratchers to learn about, and direct others toward, suggestions that were rejected by the Scratch Team. (If I and this iteration of TOLORS suddenly dropped off the face of the Earth, I would imagine that the Scratch Team would still allow someone else to create TOLORS even though there is a guide moratorium in place.)

Za-Chary wrote:

(#9553)

crazyfrogcat wrote:

I'd like to have to have this topic as 3.7 in the list

I feel like this is already covered in the Community Guidelines. Spam/disrespectful remix chains are not allowed, and otherwise remix chains are allowed because remixes are already allowed.

but in race cases the root project get's taken down meaning we *could* ban them completely if they all get too intense for scratch.

I feel like requiring all projects to be remixable by everyone is bad but someone has to be able to remix it, solution.

Za-Chary wrote:

(#9553)

crazyfrogcat wrote:

how is this guide allowed? (I guess this topic shouldn't be here) or is it disallowed? is tolors good?

If you want to be technical, this iteration of TOLORS was made before the moratorium on guides was placed, so I suppose TOLORS was grandfathered in. The more likely explanation is that TOLORS is useful for Scratchers to learn about, and direct others toward, suggestions that were rejected by the Scratch Team. (If I and this iteration of TOLORS suddenly dropped off the face of the Earth, I would imagine that the Scratch Team would still allow someone else to create TOLORS even though there is a guide moratorium in place.)

i already got a quote for that, no?

crazyfrogcat wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

(#9553)

crazyfrogcat wrote:

I'd like to have to have this topic as 3.7 in the list

I feel like this is already covered in the Community Guidelines. Spam/disrespectful remix chains are not allowed, and otherwise remix chains are allowed because remixes are already allowed.

but in race cases the root project get's taken down meaning we *could* ban them completely if they all get too intense for scratch.

isn't that already covered by

the community guidelines wrote:

Help keep the site friendly.
It’s important to keep your creations and conversations friendly and appropriate for all ages.

If you think something on Scratch is mean, insulting, too violent, or otherwise disruptive to the community, click “Report” to let us know about it. Please use the “Report” button rather than engaging in fights, spreading rumors about other people’s behavior, or otherwise responding to any inappropriate content. The Scratch Team will look at your report and take the appropriate action.

crazyfrogcat wrote:

I feel like requiring all projects to be remixable by everyone is bad but someone has to be able to remix it, solution.

What are you even asking for here? An option to only allow one scratcher to remix a project?

3.2 Disable remixing or censor minor remixes
One of the most important ideas of Scratch is the share aspect. Scratch is a website not only for displaying your work, but also for sharing it with others, and by posting your project on the Scratch website you agree to allow others to remix your work. You are not allowed to write “Do not remix this project” in the Notes and Credits of your project; you may get alerted for this, because it discourages remixing. This suggestion extends to the ability to require permission to remix a project, as you have already given permission to others to use your creations by sharing a project on Scratch; for more information, see this post.

I made a new suggestion: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/807181/

Spaceandmoon1 wrote:

I made a new suggestion: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/807181/

this isn't the place to advertise suggestions.

This suggestion extends to coding, viewing, converting, or downloading Scratch in any text-based language, including BBCode, Javascript, some form of pseudocode, or some other programming language. If you wish to code using another language, then you can learn it on your own, but it would have to be done outside of Scratch. For those who are interested, it may be worth checking out Tosh. It is a text-based programming language that serves as a text editor for Scratch projects. Another option is MakeCode Arcade, a programming language that can convert between block-based and text-based programming within the editor.

I believe adding Leopard here may be beneficial?

Willhelmianous wrote:

I believe adding Leopard here may be beneficial?

Also, snap! could be added as it has a “codification” feature

New rejected suggestion: Allow banned users to use Scratch