Why is the logo so poor quality?

kip23s

Why is the early 2.0 page logo so poor quality? And which logo does it use the 2.0 one or the 2.0 transition one?

VedanshS933

the current logo is the 3.0 one. so they dont need to care about the 2.0 logo except for readibility, which you can read…SCRATCH

kip23s

VedanshS933 wrote:
the current logo is the 3.0 one. so they don't need to care about the 2.0 logo except for readability, which you can read…SCRATCH

I'm just asking why the image has such low quality. And 2.0 pages there's a lot of them

4meansmuchmore

That is because the image resolution is the low

BigNate469

Screens have a generally higher resolution now than they did in 2013.

The 2.0 logo would have likely looked sharp on most screens at the time.

kip23s

Which 2.0 logo does it use tho the 2.0 maintenance or just 2.0

BigNate469

kip23s wrote:
Which 2.0 logo does it use tho the 2.0 maintenance or just 2.0

Just the 2.0 logo. It's the one presently to the left of the “Create” button on this page (as long as the forums continue to be scratchr2).

Last edited by BigNate469 (Yesterday 22:15:26)

kip23s

BigNate469 wrote:
kip23s wrote:
Which 2.0 logo does it use tho the 2.0 maintenance or just 2.0
Just the 2.0 logo. It's the one presently to the left of the “Create” button on this page (as long as the forums continue to be scratchr2).

But it doesn't look like the one in the 2.0 offline editor costume Scratch Logo. It looks like the one in my siggy.

NixonTopa1972

kip23s wrote:
Why is the early 2.0 page logo so poor quality? And which logo does it use the 2.0 one or the 2.0 transition one?

It's one of the old versions of Scratch. Now in 3.0, the Scratch Logo looks better.

Discuss Scratch