The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

2016s4m29

56-s wrote:
ahh yes i would like having “Ability to see Scratchers' unshared projects” on scratch so people can see my thousands of blank projects i have because i had no idea what to make and also embarrassing projects all to the public

That's rejected. Look at 3.6

Last edited by 2016s4m29 (July 29, 2024 14:53:42)

gem1001

2016s4m29 wrote:
56-s wrote:
ahh yes i would like having “Ability to see Scratchers' unshared projects” on scratch so people can see my thousands of blank projects i have because i had no idea what to make and also embarrassing projects all to the public
That's rejected. Look at 3.6

He's being sarcastic.

2016s4m29

gem1001 wrote:
2016s4m29 wrote:
56-s wrote:
ahh yes i would like having “Ability to see Scratchers' unshared projects” on scratch so people can see my thousands of blank projects i have because i had no idea what to make and also embarrassing projects all to the public
That's rejected. Look at 3.6
He's being sarcastic.

i know

gem1001

Rosho_Robotics wrote:
we need a
set [my variable v] size to [100]
set font to

set X: (0) Y: (0)

Za-Chary wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT SUGGEST THINGS HERE!
I am not a member of the Scratch Team; your suggestion will get more attention if you make your own topic about it. Also, please do not spam or create off-topic posts, or else they may be deleted.

56-s

gem1001 wrote:
2016s4m29 wrote:
56-s wrote:
ahh yes i would like having “Ability to see Scratchers' unshared projects” on scratch so people can see my thousands of blank projects i have because i had no idea what to make and also embarrassing projects all to the public
That's rejected. Look at 3.6
He's being sarcastic.

correct

Ollie-Young

I believe these are rejected:

(() ^ (0) :: operators)
set x stretch : (0) y stretch: (0) :: motion
(days since [ date ]/[ month ]/[ year ] :: sensing)

gem1001

Ollie-Young wrote:

I believe these are rejected:

(() ^ (0) :: operators)
set x stretch : (0) y stretch: (0) :: motion
(days since [ date ]/[ month ]/[ year ] :: sensing)

The exponent block is not rejected, just never implemented AFAIK.

56-s

Ollie-Young wrote:
I believe these are rejected:
set x stretch : (0) y stretch: (0) :: motion

it was not rejected it was just removed in very early versions for unknown reasons but you can still load in the stretch block into 3.0 it just is not functional.

Elijah999999

Ollie-Young wrote:

I believe these are rejected:

(() ^ (0) :: operators)
set x stretch : (0) y stretch: (0) :: motion
(days since [ date ]/[ month ]/[ year ] :: sensing)

Open suggestions for all of those already exist.
https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/2860/
https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/415802/
https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/171817/

Xzillox

Ollie-Young wrote:
Xzillox wrote:
-never mind-
?

I made a post and realized it was stupid so I edited it so it wouldn't spark a bunch of unnecessary posts

Ollie-Young

Elijah999999 wrote:
Ollie-Young wrote:
I believe these are rejected:
(() ^ (0) :: operators)
set x stretch : (0) y stretch: (0) :: motion
(days since [ date ]/[ month ]/[ year ] :: sensing)

I think scretch blocks in motion make more sense then pen

Also they probably rejected these:

<key [ enter] pressed?> // more options for the key pressed
([ int] of (0) :: operators) // this is for the (abs of [ v]) block
set rotation style [ up-down] // 4th option for set rotation style
set size to (100.5) % // decimal size
go to x: (40.5) y: (-20.35) // decimal x and y
if <not <…>> then  // <not <>> extension

  …

else
…
end

Last edited by Ollie-Young (Aug. 3, 2024 09:19:46)

ThisIsTemp1

Ollie-Young wrote:

Elijah999999 wrote:
Ollie-Young wrote:
I believe these are rejected:
(() ^ (0) :: operators)
set x stretch : (0) y stretch: (0) :: motion
(days since [ date ]/[ month ]/[ year ] :: sensing)

I think scretch blocks in motion make more sense then pen

Also they probably rejected these:

<key [ enter] pressed?> // more options for the key pressed
([ int] of (0) :: operators) // this is for the (abs of [ v]) block
set rotation style [ up-down] // 4th option for set rotation style
set size to (100.5) % // decimal size
go to x: (40.5) y: (-20.35) // decimal x and y
if <not <…>> then  // <not <>> extension

  …

else
…
end

None of those are rejected, to my knowledge.

Ollie-Young

ThisIsTemp1 wrote:
None of those are rejected, to my knowledge.

The int block was supposed to be in 2.0 but it was removed in v194

What about

(# of costumes :: looks) // number of costumes in a particular sprite
(# of backdrops :: looks) // number of backdrops in a project

Last edited by Ollie-Young (Aug. 4, 2024 00:00:21)

Za-Chary

Ollie-Young wrote:

I believe these are rejected:

(() ^ (0) :: operators)
set x stretch : (0) y stretch: (0) :: motion
(days since [ date ]/[ month ]/[ year ] :: sensing)

None of those are rejected to my knowledge.

Ollie-Young wrote:

Also they probably rejected these:

<key [ enter] pressed?> // more options for the key pressed
([ int] of (0) :: operators) // this is for the (abs of [ v]) block
set rotation style [ up-down] // 4th option for set rotation style
set size to (100.5) % // decimal size
go to x: (40.5) y: (-20.35) // decimal x and y
if <not <…>> then  // <not <>> extension

  …

else
…
end

None of those are rejected to my knowledge.

Ollie-Young wrote:
The int block was supposed to be in 2.0 but it was removed in v194

That doesn't mean it was rejected. It just means that it wasn't added.

Ollie-Young wrote:

What about

(# of costumes :: looks) // number of costumes in a particular sprite
(# of backdrops :: looks) // number of backdrops in a project

Neither of those are rejected to my knowledge. But since a Scratcher cannot add any costumes or backdrops from simply playing the project, both “# of costumes” and “# of backdrops” would be static/unchanging numbers, so I'm not sure why a reporter for either one would be necessary.

2016s4m29

Scratch_Cat_Coder8 wrote:
The “censor no code projects” suggestion is straight up cruel and mean.

True

funyp

PaperMarioFan2022 wrote:
I am glad that operation “remove report button” was rejected. I would hate if it wasn't usable anymore.

Same, it would make drama in the community, and nobody wants that. They might even swear, like {this part was yeeted by some evil kumquats}.

My brain: Is there already drama in the community?

Yay, 70th post!

Last edited by funyp (Oct. 17, 2024 19:48:31)

mumu245

Cat blocks should be moved to coding interface. The block section is about programming functions that can be used in projects, not block rendering.

ThisIsTemp1

https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/post/8078494/ We should add “adding AI for image generation”, as multiple people have suggested it, and the linked post shows cheddargirl says it is rejected due to ethical concerns.

Here is another post that got 6 pages in one day about AI:https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/post/8062488/

Last edited by ThisIsTemp1 (Aug. 6, 2024 22:04:04)

PaperMarioFan2022

ThisIsTemp1 wrote:
https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/post/8078494/ We should add use AI for image generation, as multiple people have suggested it, and the linked post shows cheddargirl says it is rejected due to ethical concerns.

Not only that, it's giving users who haven't used or already are used to the forum structure way too much of an advantage to add it in and it just destroys the purpose of coding, imo. And its getting to be a repetitive topic popping up from their blog's thread.

Last edited by PaperMarioFan2022 (Aug. 6, 2024 22:02:44)

MythosLore

I’m neutral about the AI suggestion. While @cheddargirl said that it was currently rejected, AI art does seem like something that the Scratch Team is interested in adding if they can fix the problems with it. It could be a bit confusing if an article on an official site talks about how the Scratch Team is experimenting with something that is currently rejected.

That being said, it could also make people less concerned that AI is going to be added to Scratch and ruin genuine art.

I also think that, if this does get added to the list, the rejection link should be the article, if @Za-Chary is comfortable linking to an article rather than a forum post.

Edit: Note that every time I said “article”, it was supposed to say .org before it, but it was filtered.

Last edited by MythosLore (Aug. 7, 2024 00:20:53)

Discuss Scratch