Shutting down the Scratch Forums was rejected

Jeff_Siu wrote:

<snip>

Please don't blockspam. You can go to the Scratchblocks Testing Topic to test Scratchblocks.

XCartooonX wrote:

Shutting down the Scratch Forums was rejected

Is that often suggested though?

medians wrote:

XCartooonX wrote:

Shutting down the Scratch Forums was rejected

Is that often suggested though?

Za-Chary said to post every suggestion that has been rejected lately. I'm too lazy to bring the exact post but it's there.

Removing the fishbowl sprite got rejected

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

Removing the fishbowl sprite got rejected

Just because a topic is closed for a reason other than being a duplicate doesn't mean it's rejected.

I wasn't sure, do you add solution posts like after the rejection reason like, "However, a possible solution for this rejection can be discussed here."

plantskym2 wrote:

I wasn't sure, do you add solution posts like after the rejection reason like, "However, a possible solution for this rejection can be discussed here."

Yes, for instance, there is one on 6.5.

MythosLore wrote:

plantskym2 wrote:

I wasn't sure, do you add solution posts like after the rejection reason like, "However, a possible solution for this rejection can be discussed here."

Yes, for instance, there is one on 6.5.

Ah okay, didn't catch that. Then do you think Za-Chary would add my solution for 5.2?

mumu245 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

(#8437)
I cannot access “A rating system for Scratch projects.”

Could still add it to dislikes.

Without access to the topic, I don't know what specifically the suggestion is, so I cannot add a note about it to the list.

mumu245 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

(#8437)
I don't think I can add this to the list as-is because the definition of “generic platformer” is subjective.

Maybe extend censoring projects without coding to censoring any type of project?

It's not clear to me that is rejected, though. There are definitely certain “types” of projects that are always censored.

Contraery wrote:

The source topic of 6.5 appears to have been dustbinned.

I can't find a new one myself so I thought i'd tell instead

That's unfortunate. I've actually been debating removing this entry from the list, and the fact that the source link doesn't work may be the final straw. I'm not sure if anything similar has been suggested lately, and I am also worried that Scratchers have been using this entry as an excuse to say these words on the forums. (Too many times have I seen people saying “You can definitely say these words on Scratch” … something about that is unsettling to me. Why encourage Scratchers to say borderline bad words, regardless of whether or not they really are bad?)

Thoughts on removing entry 6.5? I will probably remove it from the list next week unless there is a good reason not to do so.

medians wrote:

XCartooonX wrote:

Shutting down the Scratch Forums was rejected

Is that often suggested though?

Probably not. But thanks for bringing it to my attention anyway.

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

Removing the fishbowl sprite got rejected

No it wasn't. @Paddle2See is simply saying that they have all the feedback they need for the suggestion.

plantskym2 wrote:

Ah okay, didn't catch that. Then do you think Za-Chary would add my solution for 5.2?

I'd like confirmation from a Scratch Team member that this is not rejected. It still seems like a way to send lots of invites in a short amount of time, which doesn't really solve the problem of “It was too easy for one person to generate very large numbers of invites.”

Za-Chary wrote:

Thoughts on removing entry 6.5? I will probably remove it from the list next week unless there is a good reason not to do so.

I think you should definitely remove it, especially since I saw this quote:

cheddargirl wrote:

That said: just because those words are not currently blocked outright doesn't mean you won't get in trouble for using them - use them one too many times in a short time period and you can end up getting a notification for language. Or use them in certain places (like a profile description or avatar or forum signature) and they're likely to be removed once reported. So removing them from the forum filter won't really make sense in the interim.

[source]

Za-Chary wrote:

I'd like confirmation from a Scratch Team member that this is not rejected. It still seems like a way to send lots of invites in a short amount of time, which doesn't really solve the problem of “It was too easy for one person to generate very large numbers of invites.”

When do you think an ST member would say if it is rejected?

plantskym2 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

I'd like confirmation from a Scratch Team member that this is not rejected. It still seems like a way to send lots of invites in a short amount of time, which doesn't really solve the problem of “It was too easy for one person to generate very large numbers of invites.”

When do you think an ST member would say if it is rejected?

Ask Paddle2See maybe?

Someone forgot to close this. -_-

HelpfulScratchTools wrote:

Someone forgot to close this. -_-

There's no need to close the topic.

HelpfulScratchTools wrote:

Someone forgot to close this. -_-

this topic is used for feedback on the list, which is frequently revised to this day.

I found one:
A chat-dedicated space(s)
Link
Seems like it should be added, seeing how it is related to chatroom projects.

BigNate469 wrote:

I found one:
A chat-dedicated space(s)
Link
Seems like it should be added, seeing how it is related to chatroom projects.

But is that often suggested?

Unbanning Dot Art has been rejected

guhhhuuhuhuhhhu wrote:

Why are all these rejected? Just wondering…

you can read the reasons for rejection in the OP. example (reason for rejection underlined):

TOLORS wrote:

2.3 Set the editor to look like older versions of Scratch
Some users prefer the look and feel of the older Scratch editors, and have suggested an option to make the editor look like an older version of Scratch (such as Scratch 1.4 or 2.0), but still run off of HTML5 like Scratch 3.0 does. However, this would be more complicated for educational and documentation purposes. It could be confusing if someone is trying to learn Scratch from someone who is using a completely different layout of the editor than them. In addition, the Scratch Team changed the design for a reason: to make it easier, more intuitive, and friendlier for newcomers to use.

XCartooonX wrote:

(#8468)
Unbanning Dot Art has been rejected

It's called ASCII art