julmik6478 wrote:

You can steal find this block in hacked blocks projects.

(user ID:: sensing)

han614698 wrote:

medians wrote:

han614698 wrote:

Since there's no way to get a username from a user ID, what would this accomplish?

This could be used for cloud or saving.
Also, the user id block was not the id of the user, it did sth different
https://en.scratch-wiki.info/wiki/User_ID_(block) (it was replaced by username)

Oh mb, I remember now.

Wouldn't it just be easier to encode their username which just remains the same every time they click the flag (AFAIK this doesn't?? and if it does, then this is just the same thing)

han614698 wrote:

medians wrote:

han614698 wrote:

Since there's no way to get a username from a user ID, what would this accomplish?

This could be used for cloud or saving.
Also, the user id block was not the id of the user, it did sth different
https://en.scratch-wiki.info/wiki/User_ID_(block) (it was replaced by username)

Oh mb, I remember now.

Wouldn't it just be easier to encode their username which just remains the same every time they click the flag (AFAIK this doesn't?? and if it does, then this is just the same thing)

Za-Chary wrote:

1.4 Social action reporter blocks
This block could be used, for example, to obtain the current number of loves of the project. However, project creators can easily use these blocks to prevent Scratchers from playing unless the project is given enough loves. If a user presses the love button on a project, it should be because they enjoyed the project, not because they are trying to reach some sort of goal. Social actions are not intended to be a way to interact with a Scratch project.

This suggestion extends to all social actions, including views, loves, favorites, remixes, comments, and followers.

(number of [loves v] :: sensing)

DangerPuppy10 wrote:

you could use this to report how many views a project has (if you have good coding skills), thus leading me to this rejection. I dont know if this rejection entirely related to the post, it's just something to think about.

medians wrote:

DangerPuppy10 wrote:

you could use this to report how many views a project has (if you have good coding skills), thus leading me to this rejection. I dont know if this rejection entirely related to the post, it's just something to think about.

This has been opened for a while, and people who are logged out or are New Scratchers count towards the views.

Dragonmyflesh wrote:

Support.

Dragonmyflesh wrote:

Dragonmyflesh wrote:

Support.

That was a long time ago.

DangerPuppy10 wrote:

(#653)

This is kinda a dupe?
The topics should still be merged, because of the amount of discussion on this one.

lapisi wrote:

DangerPuppy10 wrote:

(#653)

This is kinda a dupe?
The topics should still be merged, because of the amount of discussion on this one.

that other one's closed and there's literally no discussion on it

lapisi wrote:

DangerPuppy10 wrote:

(#653)

This is kinda a dupe?
The topics should still be merged, because of the amount of discussion on this one.

that other one's closed and there's literally no discussion on it

(user [id v]::sensing
(user [name v]::sensing)

BigNate469 wrote:

Dragonmyflesh wrote:

Dragonmyflesh wrote:

Support.

That was a long time ago.

You still haven't said why.

Dragonmyflesh wrote:

Dragonmyflesh wrote:

Support.

That was a long time ago.

TheCreatorOfUnTV wrote:

medians wrote:

DangerPuppy10 wrote:

you could use this to report how many views a project has (if you have good coding skills), thus leading me to this rejection. I dont know if this rejection entirely related to the post, it's just something to think about.

This has been opened for a while, and people who are logged out or are New Scratchers count towards the views.

Someone could just use cloud variables to make sure that the user is a Scratcher, and restrict from there.