This is a standard expectation in this situation, and I think the burden is on Scratch to explain why it isn't done. I certainly can't think of an obvious reason not to do it.

GrilledCheeseBurrito wrote:

open new tab, find your studio, highlight the URL, press ctrl+c, go to other tab, paste link, should only take thirty seconds. no use really.

Yeah, one studio will help a whole lot. We are talking about more than one studio.

GrilledCheeseBurrito wrote:

I am going to stop arguing with this. We both have valid points, so what is the point of still arguing?

Disagree once again. The forums are for discussion. You guys weren't arguing, you were discussing each of your opinions.

GrilledCheeseBurrito wrote:

it's easy and anyone could do it.

Easy to write down tens of studio on a piece of paper, which will also take a while to look at and type the link back.
Anyways, support. Super useful, especially for people who have joined lots of studios. For me, I used to make games, and joined game studios. Now I am an animator, I don't want to add animations to game studios, so I have to individually go to each studio. Takes a long time.


Edit: WAIT JUST REALIZED THIS WAS A NECRO-POST… I came from another topic that was a dupe and said to come here… Is this bad for me?

No support, I doubt that many Scratchers here don't know how to copy and paste text.

lgrov44 wrote:

No support, I doubt that many Scratchers here don't know how to copy and paste text.

It’s just needlessly tedious to have to do those steps when they literally made a button to do it right away that’s just useless to the majority of users because it doesn’t necessarily let them do the thing the button says it does.
What’s even the point of the button at that point?
Support

Polargaming64 wrote:

lgrov44 wrote:

No support, I doubt that many Scratchers here don't know how to copy and paste text.

It’s just needlessly tedious to have to do those steps when they literally made a button to do it right away that’s just useless to the majority of users because it doesn’t necessarily let them do the thing the button says it does.
What’s even the point of the button at that point?
Support

Yes, but this can also apply to most studios. You could want to add it to almost any studio that allows any Scratcher to add any published project. All you really have to do is go to the project, copy the link, go to the studio and add the project. Theoretically, it saves a bunch of time when dealing with adding almost any project to almost any studio. Additionally, I could argue about how much time it saves. You would have to scroll through studios, whether it is all of just your studios, all of Scratch's, etc. and their is a chance that either the studio you want to use isn't there or takes a long time scrolling to find, especially if curate a lot of studios like me. Compare that to something that takes about 5 or so clicks, or about 5 or 10 seconds.

Only the studios that you curate will appear when you select the ‘add to studio’ button, not the ones you followed, which, can be annoying sometimes, hope that answers your question, fur now, bye!!!





~Chocolatemarhmellow

lgrov44 wrote:

Polargaming64 wrote:

lgrov44 wrote:

No support, I doubt that many Scratchers here don't know how to copy and paste text.

It’s just needlessly tedious to have to do those steps when they literally made a button to do it right away that’s just useless to the majority of users because it doesn’t necessarily let them do the thing the button says it does.
What’s even the point of the button at that point?
Support

Yes, but this can also apply to most studios. You could want to add it to almost any studio that allows any Scratcher to add any published project. All you really have to do is go to the project, copy the link, go to the studio and add the project. Theoretically, it saves a bunch of time when dealing with adding almost any project to almost any studio. Additionally, I could argue about how much time it saves. You would have to scroll through studios, whether it is all of just your studios, all of Scratch's, etc. and their is a chance that either the studio you want to use isn't there or takes a long time scrolling to find, especially if curate a lot of studios like me. Compare that to something that takes about 5 or so clicks, or about 5 or 10 seconds.

Do you realize how many studios we are talking about? It isn't just one.

plantskym2 wrote:

lgrov44 wrote:

Polargaming64 wrote:

lgrov44 wrote:

No support, I doubt that many Scratchers here don't know how to copy and paste text.

It’s just needlessly tedious to have to do those steps when they literally made a button to do it right away that’s just useless to the majority of users because it doesn’t necessarily let them do the thing the button says it does.
What’s even the point of the button at that point?
Support

Yes, but this can also apply to most studios. You could want to add it to almost any studio that allows any Scratcher to add any published project. All you really have to do is go to the project, copy the link, go to the studio and add the project. Theoretically, it saves a bunch of time when dealing with adding almost any project to almost any studio. Additionally, I could argue about how much time it saves. You would have to scroll through studios, whether it is all of just your studios, all of Scratch's, etc. and their is a chance that either the studio you want to use isn't there or takes a long time scrolling to find, especially if curate a lot of studios like me. Compare that to something that takes about 5 or so clicks, or about 5 or 10 seconds.

Do you realize how many studios we are talking about? It isn't just one.

Yes, I do realize that it is not just one studio and is significantly more than just one.

lgrov44 wrote:

Yes, I do realize that it is not just one studio and is significantly more than just one.

So how do you expect to copy and paste tens or even hundreds of studios? If it was just a few, then yes, I agree, no support, this won't save much time. But when you have a lot, copy and pasting still becomes significantly slower than if we just had this button.

leahcimto wrote:

duplicate?

I would say no, as you're option for an option to change which 20 studio show up, but they're asking for every studio to show up that you're in.

plantskym2 wrote:

lgrov44 wrote:

Yes, I do realize that it is not just one studio and is significantly more than just one.

So how do you expect to copy and paste tens or even hundreds of studios? If it was just a few, then yes, I agree, no support, this won't save much time. But when you have a lot, copy and pasting still becomes significantly slower than if we just had this button.

But isn't this better than a limited selection of studios or a select amount of studios where, on average, you would spend what feels like an eternity either way, or copy and paste a lot of URLs?

lgrov44 wrote:

plantskym2 wrote:

lgrov44 wrote:

Yes, I do realize that it is not just one studio and is significantly more than just one.

So how do you expect to copy and paste tens or even hundreds of studios? If it was just a few, then yes, I agree, no support, this won't save much time. But when you have a lot, copy and pasting still becomes significantly slower than if we just had this button.

But isn't this better than a limited selection of studios or a select amount of studios where, on average, you would spend what feels like an eternity either way, or copy and paste a lot of URLs?

No? Because you would just have to click, and it doesn't require your attention to be focused on it. But copy + pasting on the other hand, requires moving your mouse, crtl + v, and takes more time, PLUS more brainpower. (Not saying it uses a lot of brainpower or any at all, just uses a lot more than if you just clicked buttons in the same pattern.)

plantskym2 wrote:

lgrov44 wrote:

plantskym2 wrote:

lgrov44 wrote:

Yes, I do realize that it is not just one studio and is significantly more than just one.

So how do you expect to copy and paste tens or even hundreds of studios? If it was just a few, then yes, I agree, no support, this won't save much time. But when you have a lot, copy and pasting still becomes significantly slower than if we just had this button.

But isn't this better than a limited selection of studios or a select amount of studios where, on average, you would spend what feels like an eternity either way, or copy and paste a lot of URLs?

No? Because you would just have to click, and it doesn't require your attention to be focused on it. But copy + pasting on the other hand, requires moving your mouse, crtl + v, and takes more time, PLUS more brainpower. (Not saying it uses a lot of brainpower or any at all, just uses a lot more than if you just clicked buttons in the same pattern.)

I think you are misunderstanding the point I am trying to make. It is either a limited selection of studios that might not even have the studio/s that you are looking for or a long time scrolling to find the studio/s that you want to use compared to copying a URL, going to the other tab and pasting it. I don't think it is that fast of a system.

lgrov44 wrote:

No support, I doubt that many Scratchers here don't know how to copy and paste text.

While copying and pasting text is not difficult, a full add to studio menu would still be more convenient and save time as there'd be no copying and pasting at all. You'd only need to find and click the studios you want to add a project too, which shouldn't take long at all, even if you curate many studios.

lgrov44 wrote:

No support, I doubt that many Scratchers here don't know how to copy and paste text.

Mrow meow mrow meow.
(Yes, but those who don’t would benefit from this. Besides, Scratchaims to be all inclusive.)
Meow mrow meow mrow.
(Besides, it would be really annoying thinking a studios on the option, only for it to not be after a long check. )

lgrov44 wrote:

plantskym2 wrote:

lgrov44 wrote:

plantskym2 wrote:

lgrov44 wrote:

Yes, I do realize that it is not just one studio and is significantly more than just one.

So how do you expect to copy and paste tens or even hundreds of studios? If it was just a few, then yes, I agree, no support, this won't save much time. But when you have a lot, copy and pasting still becomes significantly slower than if we just had this button.

But isn't this better than a limited selection of studios or a select amount of studios where, on average, you would spend what feels like an eternity either way, or copy and paste a lot of URLs?

No? Because you would just have to click, and it doesn't require your attention to be focused on it. But copy + pasting on the other hand, requires moving your mouse, crtl + v, and takes more time, PLUS more brainpower. (Not saying it uses a lot of brainpower or any at all, just uses a lot more than if you just clicked buttons in the same pattern.)

I think you are misunderstanding the point I am trying to make. It is either a limited selection of studios that might not even have the studio/s that you are looking for or a long time scrolling to find the studio/s that you want to use compared to copying a URL, going to the other tab and pasting it. I don't think it is that fast of a system.

Well, it would take a much shorter time, despite all the points you mentioned, than still having to paste the URL like tens or even hundreds of times.

chocolatemarhmellow wrote:

Only the studios that you curate will appear when you select the ‘add to studio’ button, not the ones you followed, which, can be annoying sometimes, hope that answers your question, fur now, bye!!!





~Chocolatemarhmellow

This is not true. I curate many studios and only a bit over a dozen (not checking the exact amount rn) are in the menu.
If it is intended to show me all the ones I curate it is failing

Polargaming64 wrote:

chocolatemarhmellow wrote:

Only the studios that you curate will appear when you select the ‘add to studio’ button, not the ones you followed, which, can be annoying sometimes, hope that answers your question, fur now, bye!!!





~Chocolatemarhmellow

This is not true. I curate many studios and only a bit over a dozen (not checking the exact amount rn) are in the menu.
If it is intended to show me all the ones I curate it is failing

They mean if this is added.

plantskym2 wrote:

lgrov44 wrote:

plantskym2 wrote:

lgrov44 wrote:

plantskym2 wrote:

lgrov44 wrote:

Yes, I do realize that it is not just one studio and is significantly more than just one.

So how do you expect to copy and paste tens or even hundreds of studios? If it was just a few, then yes, I agree, no support, this won't save much time. But when you have a lot, copy and pasting still becomes significantly slower than if we just had this button.

But isn't this better than a limited selection of studios or a select amount of studios where, on average, you would spend what feels like an eternity either way, or copy and paste a lot of URLs?

No? Because you would just have to click, and it doesn't require your attention to be focused on it. But copy + pasting on the other hand, requires moving your mouse, crtl + v, and takes more time, PLUS more brainpower. (Not saying it uses a lot of brainpower or any at all, just uses a lot more than if you just clicked buttons in the same pattern.)

I think you are misunderstanding the point I am trying to make. It is either a limited selection of studios that might not even have the studio/s that you are looking for or a long time scrolling to find the studio/s that you want to use compared to copying a URL, going to the other tab and pasting it. I don't think it is that fast of a system.

Well, it would take a much shorter time, despite all the points you mentioned, than still having to paste the URL like tens or even hundreds of times.

Well, compare it one studio at a time. You either wouldn't find it or would have to scroll a lot. Compare that to copy and pasting the URL. I don't know how to simplify this thought any further. You are comparing either a long time scrolling to about 5 or 10 seconds per studio or a chance of it not being there to 5 or 10 seconds per studio. I'm just saying that the long time scrolling compared to 5 or 10 seconds is quite significant and it having limited amount of studios is probably worse than 5 or 10 seconds per studio as well, either way I think it is non-beneficial.
EDIT 1: How did I just realize that you can just do both to save time if the studio isn't there? My mistakes, I finally see what you are saying.
EDIT 2: I have changed my mind, I support.