starlightsparker wrote:

chippysmall4 wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

chippysmall4 wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

Again, this is a dupe https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/516871/
why isn’t this closed lol

This Is Not A Duplicate Topic, This Is Suggesting A New Readout, Similar To The Large Readout, Not Customisation Features.

Same thing tbh
That topic has your suggestions + more
Still qualifies as a dupe
(Sorry if this comes off as rude! No hard feelings )

This Suggests A New Readout, That Does Not. The Main Suggestion Is Not A Duplicate Topic.

That also suggests a new customizable readout.

No, That Suggests Readout Customisation As The Main Suggestion. This Suggests A New Readout As The Main Suggestion. To Be Clear, “Readout” Means A New Readout Similar To The Large Readout, Slider Readout And Normal Readout, Not Variable Customisation. As For The Blocks In The Suggestion, They Are Not A Part Of The Main Suggestion.

chippysmall4 wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

chippysmall4 wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

chippysmall4 wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

Again, this is a dupe https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/516871/
why isn’t this closed lol

This Is Not A Duplicate Topic, This Is Suggesting A New Readout, Similar To The Large Readout, Not Customisation Features.

Same thing tbh
That topic has your suggestions + more
Still qualifies as a dupe
(Sorry if this comes off as rude! No hard feelings )

This Suggests A New Readout, That Does Not. The Main Suggestion Is Not A Duplicate Topic.

That also suggests a new customizable readout.

No, That Suggests Readout Customisation As The Main Suggestion. This Suggests A New Readout As The Main Suggestion. To Be Clear, “Readout” Means A New Readout Similar To The Large Readout, Slider Readout And Normal Readout, Not Variable Customisation. As For The Blocks In The Suggestion, They Are Not A Part Of The Main Suggestion.

Okay.
Also why do you Type Like This, It’s Really Hard To Read

chippysmall4 wrote:

(#61)

starlightsparker wrote:

chippysmall4 wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

chippysmall4 wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

Again, this is a dupe https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/516871/
why isn’t this closed lol

This Is Not A Duplicate Topic, This Is Suggesting A New Readout, Similar To The Large Readout, Not Customisation Features.

Same thing tbh
That topic has your suggestions + more
Still qualifies as a dupe
(Sorry if this comes off as rude! No hard feelings )

This Suggests A New Readout, That Does Not. The Main Suggestion Is Not A Duplicate Topic.

That also suggests a new customizable readout.

No, That Suggests Readout Customisation As The Main Suggestion. This Suggests A New Readout As The Main Suggestion. To Be Clear, “Readout” Means A New Readout Similar To The Large Readout, Slider Readout And Normal Readout, Not Variable Customisation. As For The Blocks In The Suggestion, They Are Not A Part Of The Main Suggestion.

That suggestion makes more sense, since this readout is identical to the large readout but even larger.

Bump

starlightsparker wrote:

chippysmall4 wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

chippysmall4 wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

Again, this is a dupe https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/516871/
why isn’t this closed lol

This Is Not A Duplicate Topic, This Is Suggesting A New Readout, Similar To The Large Readout, Not Customisation Features.

Same thing tbh
That topic has your suggestions + more
Still qualifies as a dupe
(Sorry if this comes off as rude! No hard feelings )

This Suggests A New Readout, That Does Not. The Main Suggestion Is Not A Duplicate Topic.

That also suggests a new customizable readout.

No, that suggests setting the readout through code. Though I think it would make more sense to have sth to display text, so you could use the current value of the variable.

Bump

Bump

Bump

Bump

Bump

Bump

Bump