Elijah999999 wrote:

If it were blacklisted, what would happen if someone triggered it? They're not saying a bad word, so the ST would have to do a separate message exclusively for that.

The_Blue_J wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

josueart wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

Why can't you just ignore the message and not follow them?

Remember this site's userbase are all kids.

"follow me or your sink will explode"

Followers don't matter though, so I don't see the harm in following someone like this.

Not many scratchers think that way, especially after seeing the similarities, between Scratch and other websites like Youtube…

roofogato wrote:

is this phrase really that bad to be banned? people could always get around the censor by rephrasing themselves…

The_Blue_J wrote:

KingRat_1 wrote:

It doesn't hurt anyone to follow someone though? I really don't see the issue.

But seeing this spammed everywhere justifies why it should be censored by the filter.

sonic__fan wrote:

The_Blue_J wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

josueart wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

Why can't you just ignore the message and not follow them?

Remember this site's userbase are all kids.

"follow me or your sink will explode"

Followers don't matter though, so I don't see the harm in following someone like this.

Not many scratchers think that way, especially after seeing the similarities, between Scratch and other websites like Youtube…

That's their fault.

The_Blue_J wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

The_Blue_J wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

josueart wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

Why can't you just ignore the message and not follow them?

Remember this site's userbase are all kids.

"follow me or your sink will explode"

Followers don't matter though, so I don't see the harm in following someone like this.

Not many scratchers think that way, especially after seeing the similarities, between Scratch and other websites like Youtube…

That's their fault.

And Scratch aims to fix this fault that occurs on it's scratchers…

KingRat_1 wrote:

If you see the comment once you can just ignore it
If someone keeps posting it over and over you can report it for spam.
It's not inherently harmful and doesn't need to be banned.

sonic__fan wrote:

How? By banning a phrase that's harmless and easily by-passable?

So is chainmail, it's quite harmless and you can ignore it, but due to it's spammy nature, the filter blacklists a few popular types of chainmail, same thing here, except it is just like advertising in disguise of an “experiment”…

The_Blue_J wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

How? By banning a phrase that's harmless and easily by-passable?

FARFR (Frequently Answered Reasons For Rejection)
1. It's quite harmless, so I don't see why it should be censored…

So is chainmail, it's quite harmless and you can ignore it, but due to it's spammy nature, the filter blacklists a few popular types of chainmail, same thing here, except it is just like advertising in disguise of an “experiment”…

sonic__fan wrote:

and easily by-passable

sonic__fan wrote:

The_Blue_J wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

How? By banning a phrase that's harmless and easily by-passable?

FARFR (Frequently Answered Reasons For Rejection)
1. It's quite harmless, so I don't see why it should be censored…

So is chainmail, it's quite harmless and you can ignore it, but due to it's spammy nature, the filter blacklists a few popular types of chainmail, same thing here, except it is just like advertising in disguise of an “experiment”…

You forgot the second part of that post:

sonic__fan wrote:

and easily by-passable

Even if we were to ban it, people can just use different wording to bypass this.

The_Blue_J wrote:

KingRat_1 wrote:

If you see the comment once you can just ignore it
If someone keeps posting it over and over you can report it for spam.
It's not inherently harmful and doesn't need to be banned.

And when it becomes popular, it becomes spam…

KingRat_1 wrote:

(#74)
I've never seen this happen, but again if people are spamming it then you can report them for spam

Zydrolic wrote:

KingRat_1 wrote:

(#74)
I've never seen this happen, but again if people are spamming it then you can report them for spam

OBJECTION!

ASCII art has been counted as spam and has many of them on the filter. Thus, filtering this is fair play.

KingRat_1 wrote:

Zydrolic wrote:

KingRat_1 wrote:

(#74)
I've never seen this happen, but again if people are spamming it then you can report them for spam

OBJECTION!

ASCII art has been counted as spam and has many of them on the filter. Thus, filtering this is fair play.

This is much harder to filter

MagicCoder330 wrote:

(#77)
Even if it is hard to do so, it is still a good idea to add this to the filter, because it is spamming. Even if rephrasing it isnt blocked at first, the ST can collect more phrases from reports and add them to the filter too.

Zydrolic wrote:

MagicCoder330 wrote:

(#77)
Even if it is hard to do so, it is still a good idea to add this to the filter, because it is spamming. Even if rephrasing it isnt blocked at first, the ST can collect more phrases from reports and add them to the filter too.

EUREKA!
“”Eureka!“ is a speech bubble used by Miles Edgeworth and Gregory Edgeworth when they deduce something about a crime scene using evidence.”

Not to forget the mention of the fact that they would still deal with much less spam by adding this to the filter.

If we were to just censor the whole phrase rather than the individual words would could make writing a normal comment unfeasibly impossible, then we already filtered it without issue!

MagicCoder330 wrote:

(#79)
Sorry, a bit confused by this phrase “Unfeasibly impossible” are you saying its unfeasible that it would be impossible or that its impossible?