Only allow whitelisted URLs for new scratchers or don't allow them to post offsite links

ImARealDogNow

amogus1123 wrote:
(#241)
me when: youtube com/ watch ?v= (an id)

don't put the dots :p – a simple bypass

You forgot the domain URL is already censored due to that being already a bypass of something.

And it's impossible to create a filter that is bulletproof to all bypasses, though not negligible.

ImARealDogNow

bump

DifferentDance8

It's a cat and mouse game when it comes to filters in general, so people are bound to bypass it. Even the tried and tested filter bot isn't immune.

Last edited by DifferentDance8 (Oct. 26, 2023 08:13:02)

ImARealDogNow

DifferentDance8 wrote:
(#244)
It's a cat and mouse game when it comes to filters in general, so people are bound to bypass it. Even the tried and tested filter bot isn't immune.

and its not a negligible problem, but still.
And even then it's impossible to make a perfect filterbot.

slushiies-

ImARealDogNow wrote:
amogus1123 wrote:
(#241)
me when: youtube com/ watch ?v= (an id)

don't put the dots :p – a simple bypass
You forgot the domain URL is already censored due to that being already a bypass of something.

And it's impossible to create a filter that is bulletproof to all bypasses, though not negligible.

That's true because the filter has to be advanced enough to know if they're bypassing.
I honestly agree with this forum post because people have been getting they're info stolen by harmful websites that have been posted on scratch. Support

ImARealDogNow

move that topic up

bump

Last edited by ImARealDogNow (Oct. 29, 2023 20:31:42)

Very_Interesting_Bid

Support as I can't find any reason to nosupport

edit: I do believe that this would only be a temporary solution, as people have stated above me, filters are a cat-and-mouse game

Last edited by Very_Interesting_Bid (Oct. 29, 2023 22:11:28)

ImARealDogNow

we do a bit of BUMPing

SlackinOff

bump

EDIT:

-_Deleted_users_- wrote:
(#250)
-snip-

I'm OP but on the account I moved to
please don't name and shame theres no need to confirm the obvious
the post is pretty dated so I'm rewriting portions of it later on sooner or later
and still it doesnt matter, most i've seen are new scratcher so just give them a game of waiting for santa claus and they might not have enough determination

Last edited by SlackinOff (Oct. 31, 2023 14:54:51)

SlackinOff

SlackinOff wrote:
(#250)
bump

SlackinOff

SlackinOff wrote:
(#251)
SlackinOff wrote:
(#250)
bump

Awesome_Sauce10

Definitely will make Scratch a safer and scam-free enviroment! Totally approve

SlackinOff

SlackinOff wrote:
(#252)
SlackinOff wrote:
(#251)
SlackinOff wrote:
(#250)
bump

Kris-Dreemurr1

SlackinOff wrote:
SlackinOff wrote:
(#252)
SlackinOff wrote:
(#251)
SlackinOff wrote:
(#250)
bump

how did you make that video?

ImARealDogNow

(EDIT: I consider 2 malicious + 1 suspicious as a rating to be enough to count it as one, I'm sometimes a hyperbole.)
Bump
QaS had another one of these issues again, another phishing link, mere minutes ago.

Last edited by ImARealDogNow (Nov. 4, 2023 09:33:49)

DifferentDance8

ImARealDogNow wrote:
Bump
QaS had another one of these issues again, another phishing link, mere minutes ago.

the what

ImARealDogNow

DifferentDance8 wrote:
(#257)
ImARealDogNow wrote:
Bump
QaS had another one of these issues again, another phishing link, mere minutes ago.
the what

well, technically. though i consider 2 malicious + 1 suspicious enough to count it as one, I'm sometimes a hyperbole

SlackinOff

bump

SlackinOff

SlackinOff wrote:
(#259)
bump

PaperMarioFan2022

Could improve security for new scratchers greatly.

Wow! A super star at the top of the new page!

Last edited by PaperMarioFan2022 (Nov. 6, 2023 20:20:41)

Discuss Scratch