I am suggesting a Scratch extension to interact with Minecraft. Here are the blocks it would have:

when [connected v] :: extension hat
connect to minecraft server at [example.net:25565] :: extension //username is now "Scratch_" appended to the Scratch username
move (15) blocks :: extension
face (90)° :: extension
face (north v) :: extension
switch to inventory slot () :: extension
run command [/gamemode c] :: extension //can not run "/say", "/me", etc. because chat is rejected
rightclick :: extension
click :: extension
click and hold for (1) seconds :: extension
[health v] :: extension reporter // health, hunger, breath, and armor
item in inventory slot (1) :: extension reporter //1-9: Hotbar and 10-36: Main Inventory
touching (minecraft:air v) :: extension
[x v] position :: extension reporter //x, y, or z
connected? :: extension boolean
server [ip v] :: extension reporter // ip, ping (ms), motd, version, software

EDIT: 3/10/2023 5:15 PM EST: Removed chat feature as it is rejected. Replaced with run command (can not run “/say”, “/me”, etc.)
EDIT: 3/16/2023 7:30 AM EST: Removed custom username ability. You now need to sign in to Scratch to use it.

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

Knightbot63 wrote:

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

It’s definitely a joke topic
Ik because

cwkelliott47732 wrote:

I am suggesting a Scratch extension to interact with Minecraft. Here are the blocks it would have:

when [connected v] :: extension hat
connect to cracked minecraft server at [example.net:25565] with username [Scratcher1234] :: extension//this

No other explanation as to why it would be cracked, it’s obviously illegal

So this has to be a joke topic

Knightbot63 wrote:

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

Microsoft allows things to connect to Minecraft servers.

Knightbot63 wrote:

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

Notch could collab with scratch like BBC did with the microbit. But that would be rare.

Crispydogs101 wrote:

Knightbot63 wrote:

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

Notch could collab with scratch like BBC did with the microbit. But that would be rare.

Notch doesn’t work for mojang anymore

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

Knightbot63 wrote:

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

It’s definitely a joke topic
Ik because

cwkelliott47732 wrote:

I am suggesting a Scratch extension to interact with Minecraft. Here are the blocks it would have:

when [connected v] :: extension hat
connect to cracked minecraft server at [example.net:25565] with username [Scratcher1234] :: extension//this

No other explanation as to why it would be cracked, it’s obviously illegal

So this has to be a joke topic

the op knows cracked servers are illegal, otherwise they wouldn’t know what a cracked server is,
So it must be a joke otherwise they are seriously trying to suggest breaking the law
And there’s also no option to connect to a non cracked server

Knightbot63 wrote:

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

Code.org did this too,
Let's think about it minecraft encourages people to code too. So, don't think about copyright, I just want them to collab with minecraft for that reason. They need to collab with minecraft before minecraft extensions would be thought about first.

I support if the block like code site scratch would consider collaborating with their other blocky code site neighbor literary. Besides minecraft does there job well for coding these-

Crispydogs101 wrote:

Knightbot63 wrote:

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

Notch could collab with scratch like BBC did with the microbit. But that would be rare.

I mean one of the scratch team members will have to meet up with mojang… It could actually help the site too since there's alot of scratchers who play minecraft.

cs3868895 wrote:

Knightbot63 wrote:

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

Code.org did this too,
Let's think about it minecraft encourages people to code too. So, don't think about copyright, I just want them to collab with minecraft for that reason. They need to collab with minecraft before minecraft extensions would be thought about first.

I support if the block like code site scratch would consider collaborating with their other blocky code site neighbor literary. Besides minecraft does there job well for coding these-

I seriously think the op must have been joking with this because apparently you would only be able to connect to cracked servers

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

Knightbot63 wrote:

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

It’s definitely a joke topic
Ik because

cwkelliott47732 wrote:

I am suggesting a Scratch extension to interact with Minecraft. Here are the blocks it would have:

when [connected v] :: extension hat
connect to cracked minecraft server at [example.net:25565] with username [Scratcher1234] :: extension//this

No other explanation as to why it would be cracked, it’s obviously illegal

So this has to be a joke topic

The concept of minecraft and scratch collaborating is obviously not the blocks, makes it look like a joke topic.
I'm just trying to shine some light on this suggestion.

Joke topics are bad if they're trying to joke about it, losing the support that could potentially be a very good suggestion.

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

Crispydogs101 wrote:

Knightbot63 wrote:

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

Notch could collab with scratch like BBC did with the microbit. But that would be rare.

Notch doesn’t work for mojang anymore

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

Knightbot63 wrote:

How's this useful. Also,

C O P Y R I G H T

It’s definitely a joke topic
Ik because

cwkelliott47732 wrote:

I am suggesting a Scratch extension to interact with Minecraft. Here are the blocks it would have:

when [connected v] :: extension hat
connect to cracked minecraft server at [example.net:25565] with username [Scratcher1234] :: extension//this

No other explanation as to why it would be cracked, it’s obviously illegal

So this has to be a joke topic

the op knows cracked servers are illegal, otherwise they wouldn’t know what a cracked server is,
So it must be a joke otherwise they are seriously trying to suggest breaking the law
And there’s also no option to connect to a non cracked server

It's cracked because if not, users would need to enter their passwords into Scratch projects. Maybe it would interact with a mod, instead?

cwkelliott47732 wrote:

It's cracked because if not, users would need to enter their passwords into Scratch projects. Maybe it would interact with a mod, instead?

Sir thinking about that, I don't want to enter my password several times, maybe even better connecting to the code blocks minecraft has…. If this is what you mean why it would be cracked then….

How would this be useful?
Minecraft has nothing to do with Scratch.

What's a “cracked Minecraft server”?
How would this be useful? Wouldn't these blocks just be making bots on Minecraft servers? Wouldn't this take up a lot of Scratch and the Minecraft server's traffic?

sonic__fan wrote:

How would this be useful?
Minecraft has nothing to do with Scratch.

minecraft coding Minecraft has partnered with code.org so why not.

cs3868895 wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

How would this be useful?
Minecraft has nothing to do with Scratch.

minecraft coding They have partnered with code.org so why not.

What do you mean “minecraft coding”? Do you mean coding your own stuff in Minecraft? If so, make your own Minecraft mods.

wer65hertg wrote:

What's a “cracked Minecraft server”?

As far as I remember, they are servers that allows cracked minecraft accounts, and they secure these accounts through a registration system or an email verification system.

sonic__fan wrote:

cs3868895 wrote:

sonic__fan wrote:

How would this be useful?
Minecraft has nothing to do with Scratch.

minecraft coding They have partnered with code.org so why not.

What do you mean “minecraft coding”? Do you mean coding your own stuff in Minecraft? If so, make your own Minecraft mods.

Yup maybe you're right lol

wer65hertg wrote:

What's a “cracked Minecraft server”?
How would this be useful? Wouldn't these blocks just be making bots on Minecraft servers? Wouldn't this take up a lot of Scratch and the Minecraft server's traffic?

That was my original idea, but now I think maybe Scratch should make an official Minecraft mod that would connect to Scratch, and require an actual player to join the server.

rejected

Tolors wrote:

1.7 3D Scratch
This block, and others, could be used with a z-axis in the project stage to make it easier to create 3D projects. But, Scratch is a language that is designed to be as easy as possible for beginners to learn. Adding 3D features would make the language more difficult for beginners to understand, and a 3D engine is not exactly the purpose of Scratch. This suggestion also includes the possibility for virtual-reality features in Scratch, or “Scratch VR.” A lot of the same difficulties come up.

For those who are interested, it may be worth checking out Beetle Blocks or CreatiCode. They are block-based programming languages similar to the Scratch editor, but with 3D features. There is another similar program to Scratch that contains block programming with 3D features, called Starlogo TNG. You can also try Alice; it is not exactly like Scratch, but has some similar features.

go to x: () y: () z: () :: motion

why am i saying it's rejected? V

op wrote:

[x v] position :: extension reporter //x, y, or z

They want a block that can report the z position, which is 3D, which is rejected