blah blah

This is more relevant in Suggestions. Don't worry I'll ask a moderator to move this for you.
Also there is a 100% chance that this is a dupe. Once someone finds it, please continue the discussion there.

I doubt they'd do this, the whole reason why non-Scratch links are disabled is to prevent young users from going off-site and getting exposed to inappropiate content.

true, but Turbowarp and Forkforus is related to scratch.

Nate4893 wrote:

(#4)
true, but Turbowarp and Forkforus is related to scratch.

Someone may link their inappropriate project and link it via turbowarp or turbowarp but it's a fork. Then again, the Scratch Team is working on the API so the inappropriate content may not be a massive problem.

turbowarp is not affiliated to scratch, that's why the links aren't hyperlinks
also there have been multiple problems with people sharing inappropriate content through turbowarp links so they probably won't do it

Ok. thank you all for helping out to try, though.

Nate4893 wrote:

Dear Scratch Team,
Please take note of this: @GarboMuffin made the well known websites known as Turbowarp.org and Forkforus.github.io. Would you mind to take a moment of your time to allow these website links to become hyperlinks in Scratch so it would be convenient to us Scratchers who make games that run faster and smoother on Turbowarp and Forkforus. Thank you for your time.
Salutations,
@Nate4893

It's called Forkphorus but else… ///

5u74 wrote:

Nate4893 wrote:

Dear Scratch Team,
Please take note of this: @GarboMuffin made the well known websites known as Turbowarp.org and Forkforus.github.io. Would you mind to take a moment of your time to allow these website links to become hyperlinks in Scratch so it would be convenient to us Scratchers who make games that run faster and smoother on Turbowarp and Forkforus. Thank you for your time.
Salutations,
@Nate4893

It's called Forkphorus but else… ///

oh, well, sorry, i don't use forkphorus as much as I use Turbowarp, thank you for the correction.

meepeygamer567 wrote:

Nate4893 wrote:

(#4)
true, but Turbowarp and Forkforus is related to scratch.

Someone may link their inappropriate project and link it via turbowarp or turbowarp but it's a fork. Then again, the Scratch Team is working on the API so the inappropriate content may not be a massive problem.

I agree. Could @GarboMuffin filter the projects put on Turbowarp and Forkphorus though?

-Valtren- wrote:

turbowarp is not affiliated to scratch, that's why the links aren't hyperlinks
also there have been multiple problems with people sharing inappropriate content through turbowarp links so they probably won't do it

I understand this. Would it be possible to ask @GarboMuffin to monitor what is put on Turbowarp and Forkphorus?

Nate4893 wrote:

-Valtren- wrote:

turbowarp is not affiliated to scratch, that's why the links aren't hyperlinks
also there have been multiple problems with people sharing inappropriate content through turbowarp links so they probably won't do it

I understand this. Would it be possible to ask @GarboMuffin to monitor what is put on Turbowarp and Forkphorus?

Well every turbowarp has every single scratch project, shared or unshared, and I don't think anyone can or wants to monitor that many projects.

Edit: Oh wait I dont think that it's every unshared project, but I know that they do have a lot of unshared projects there

Nate4893 wrote:

meepeygamer567 wrote:

Nate4893 wrote:

(#4)
true, but Turbowarp and Forkforus is related to scratch.

Someone may link their inappropriate project and link it via turbowarp or turbowarp but it's a fork. Then again, the Scratch Team is working on the API so the inappropriate content may not be a massive problem.

I agree. Could @GarboMuffin filter the projects put on Turbowarp and Forkphorus though?

Garbo is just one guy and he's probably more concerned with keeping Forkforus/Turbowarp running than moderating. According to his profile he's also busy with life outside of Scratch.

I believe Scratch has already made API changes that disallow unshared projects from being seen with external tools.

On your actual suggestion; unless Scratch owns the website(s) themselves, they don't want to associate with it for liability reasons. Really stinks because TW can run a lot better than the default Scratch project player, but them's the breaks.

NanoRook wrote:

I believe Scratch has already made API changes that disallow unshared projects from being seen with external tools.

Actually, the changes weren't made yet

Nate4893 wrote:

true, but Turbowarp and Forkforus is related to scratch.

Not every site or thing related to Scratch is allowed - such as certain chatting apps and browser extensions (which I'm not allowed to discuss).

Turbowarp would be very useful as a hyper link. Having to copy and paste it is very annoying. Do the people who argue agiasnt this know that turbowarp links are already all across scratch in many projects. Turbowarp interpreter is just superior in EVERY aspect. Much more control, like canvas size, frame rate, fencing remover, higher quality pen, and infinite clones. Turbowarp also runs in many cases 20x faster in iterative tasks.

Turbowarp is a major part of the more advanced scratch community and without it would be very limited.

XxhackerlolxX wrote:

Turbowarp would be very useful as a hyper link. Having to copy and paste it is very annoying. Do the people who argue agiasnt this know that turbowarp links are already all across scratch in many projects. Turbowarp interpreter is just superior in EVERY aspect. Much more control, like canvas size, frame rate, fencing remover, higher quality pen, and infinite clones. Turbowarp also runs in many cases 20x faster in iterative tasks.

Turbowarp is a major part of the more advanced scratch community and without it would be very limited.

Well of course they know that I think everyone knows that turbowarp is popular.

What we are saying is that with turbowarp people can get away with uploading bad images and you can't really moderate turbowarp either

PandasAreCooI wrote:

Well of course they know that I think everyone knows that turbowarp is popular.

Personally i haven't known that turbowarp existed for 2 years and i'm pretty sure many other scratchers still don't know what is turbowarp

PandasAreCooI wrote:

XxhackerlolxX wrote:

Turbowarp would be very useful as a hyper link. Having to copy and paste it is very annoying. Do the people who argue agiasnt this know that turbowarp links are already all across scratch in many projects. Turbowarp interpreter is just superior in EVERY aspect. Much more control, like canvas size, frame rate, fencing remover, higher quality pen, and infinite clones. Turbowarp also runs in many cases 20x faster in iterative tasks.

Turbowarp is a major part of the more advanced scratch community and without it would be very limited.

Well of course they know that I think everyone knows that turbowarp is popular.

What we are saying is that with turbowarp people can get away with uploading bad images and you can't really moderate turbowarp either

YouTube links are a trillion times more dangerous than turbowarp, and yes turbowarp can be moderated. Remember all links on turbrowarp are actual projects on the website. All a mod would have to do is delete the project that the inappropriate stuff is on.

randomguy3513 wrote:

PandasAreCooI wrote:

Well of course they know that I think everyone knows that turbowarp is popular.

Personally i haven't known that turbowarp existed for 2 years and i'm pretty sure many other scratchers still don't know what is turbowarp

Yes its more for the advanced scratchers making mathematical projects, or projects that take a lot of computation or good graphics.