Discuss Scratch

bunnyCoder16
Scratcher
500+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

Even the first project on scratch has been affected by this.

https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/projects/104#:~:text=%C2%A9,Feb%2002%2C%202022

Last edited by bunnyCoder16 (May 13, 2022 17:30:54)

Latexbeast
Scratcher
100+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

support! I hate mass reporting!!
randomguy3513
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

support but i think there should be a last updated along with the realeese date
bunnyCoder16
Scratcher
500+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

randomguy3513 wrote:

support but i think there should be a last updated along with the realeese date
That is a great idea!!
Maybe you hover over the release date and you can see the last updated date.
blablablahello
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

I believe a “creation date” would also work (share date changes, but creation date always stays as the day the project first got created)
sharkode
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

Bump
sharkode
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

bump
sharkode
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

bump
nuclear_news
Scratcher
54 posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

support
shadic52
Scratcher
100 posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

Support all the way
jbthepig
Scratcher
500+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

Support. Especially if the project was falsely reported, the creator shouldn't be attacked for copying a project that actually belongs to them.
ChloeKohli
Scratcher
67 posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

It's been a while, I hope this isn't necroposting…
SUPPORT <3
medians
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

when green flag clicked
set [page v] to [1]
-An_Unnamed_User-
Scratcher
43 posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

medians wrote:

when green flag clicked
set [page v] to [1]
this is the wrong topic to test code blocks. you should test blocks in here.
-Valtren-
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

-An_Unnamed_User- wrote:

medians wrote:

when green flag clicked
set [page v] to [1]
this is the wrong topic to test code blocks. you should test blocks in here.
actually I think they're trying to bump the topic
Goldensun_Silverdrop
Scratcher
100+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

I support this idea. @Coderwe2's suggestion is also great (about having an original day and reshare day)
FluffyBumblebees74
Scratcher
100+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

sharkode wrote:

Changing the share date can cause confusions to which project is original, which leads to false reports and more auto censoring, also, some mass reporters want a project to be taken down to cause confusion, if we keep the original share date, it might reduce the number of mass reporting

Edit: This includes both auto censor and legitimate censoring by ST, as it could also cause confusion and sometimes ST censor things by mistake
Support. There should be a release date of the project, and the date when it was last updated.

EXAMPLE

First Shared: May, 14, 2007
Last Updated: May, 15, 2007

Hope this suggestion gets accepted!
Knightbot63
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

bump. 2nd or 3rd page
DifferentDance8
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

sharkode wrote:

because it wouldn't be good. (#76)
It could also be a double edged sword.

As a good example, almost every single game on scratch gets temporarily unshared and then reshared. Like, Appel was originally released late 2020, but many updates have happened and now the upload date says “Aug 19, 2022”.

And the hypothetical exploit sharkode was talking about is the bad example.
sharkode
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Censoring shouldn't affect share dates

DifferentDance8 wrote:

(#102)

sharkode wrote:

because it wouldn't be good. (#76)
It could also be a double edged sword.

As a good example, almost every single game on scratch gets temporarily unshared and then reshared. Like, Appel was originally released late 2020, but many updates have happened and now the upload date says “Aug 19, 2022”.

And the hypothetical exploit sharkode was talking about is the bad example.
I don't see a point in including manual unsharing, since you know the consequences and are ok with them if you unshare it manually

Powered by DjangoBB