YtArie5 wrote:

I'm black and it seems to detect my face just fine

qloakonscratch wrote:

I can't comment on this because I don't really like talking about things including racism.

sharkode wrote:

From what I've heard, it seems like face sensing wasn't a thing because apparently face sensing is “racist”

VedanshS933 wrote:

Bring Up My Topic!

dhuls wrote:

sharkode wrote:

From what I've heard, it seems like face sensing wasn't a thing because apparently face sensing is “racist”

sharkode wrote:

dhuls wrote:

sharkode wrote:

From what I've heard, it seems like face sensing wasn't a thing because apparently face sensing is “racist”

citation needed

https://medium.com/scratchteam-blog/exploring-a-creative-safe-introduction-to-machine-learning-c42f1d0133e7

rayli1123 wrote:

sharkode wrote:

dhuls wrote:

sharkode wrote:

From what I've heard, it seems like face sensing wasn't a thing because apparently face sensing is “racist”

citation needed

https://medium.com/scratchteam-blog/exploring-a-creative-safe-introduction-to-machine-learning-c42f1d0133e7

It says that racial and gender group sensing is a challenge with machine learning. That doesn't mean that they're pausing development because of that.

k0d3rrr wrote:

I understand what is meant by Face Sensing being “racist”, but it's just a flaw in the programming that makes it that way.

VedanshS933 wrote:

VedanshS933 wrote:

Bring Up My Topic!

Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.

VedanshS933 wrote:

VedanshS933 wrote:

VedanshS933 wrote:

Bring Up My Topic!

Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.

VedanshS933 wrote:

VedanshS933 wrote:

VedanshS933 wrote:

VedanshS933 wrote:

Bring Up My Topic!

Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.

sharkode wrote:

rayli1123 wrote:

sharkode wrote:

dhuls wrote:

sharkode wrote:

From what I've heard, it seems like face sensing wasn't a thing because apparently face sensing is “racist”

citation needed

https://medium.com/scratchteam-blog/exploring-a-creative-safe-introduction-to-machine-learning-c42f1d0133e7

It says that racial and gender group sensing is a challenge with machine learning. That doesn't mean that they're pausing development because of that.

I never said they are pausing development, if they ignore the so called “racist” stuff they can already add the thing to Scratch by now

sharkode wrote:

From what I've heard, it seems like face sensing wasn't a thing because apparently face sensing is “racist”

Pizza0430 wrote:

(all “you” in this suggestion means the Scratch Team and widely about the Scratchers)
Hello, anyone who's reading this. I really would like the ST to add the Scratch Labs. The reason is because I wanted to make a project about you can make a virtual avatar, to simulate a small metaverse. My current metaverse is different, so I think the text printing can have workarounds, but the camera one is extremely cool that I want you to add in this year, best this month even. I think the extension does not need more functions - uh uh.

So my suggestion is to add it quicker. I know I'm in a big rush and you prob need some time to make it, I know it's not easy to develop thing such as this, and problems might go out, but if you can do this, please hurry and I hope my metaverse project can be made soon. This could bring more creativity for projects, widen the range of Scratch coding and improve on the interface so more people can get interested on coding, not just thinking it is a bunch of weird English with some weird symbols and the computer runs loops forever, but something that you can play with and make.

I really want my virtual avatar project done. I hope this can make you do it in this month. And btw, if you're a scratch team who develops AF interface, you might know that SHA1 is not a good way to encrypt hashcodes, right? But the 2022 AF interface is using a hash code SHA1.

And redirected to a dino-giffic. Dino gif ic. Creepy.

qloakonscratch wrote:

sharkode wrote:

rayli1123 wrote:

sharkode wrote:

dhuls wrote:

sharkode wrote:

From what I've heard, it seems like face sensing wasn't a thing because apparently face sensing is “racist”

citation needed

https://medium.com/scratchteam-blog/exploring-a-creative-safe-introduction-to-machine-learning-c42f1d0133e7

It says that racial and gender group sensing is a challenge with machine learning. That doesn't mean that they're pausing development because of that.

I never said they are pausing development, if they ignore the so called “racist” stuff they can already add the thing to Scratch by now

This you?

sharkode wrote:

From what I've heard, it seems like face sensing wasn't a thing because apparently face sensing is “racist”

sharkode wrote:

qloakonscratch wrote:

sharkode wrote:

rayli1123 wrote:

sharkode wrote:

dhuls wrote:

sharkode wrote:

From what I've heard, it seems like face sensing wasn't a thing because apparently face sensing is “racist”

citation needed

https://medium.com/scratchteam-blog/exploring-a-creative-safe-introduction-to-machine-learning-c42f1d0133e7

It says that racial and gender group sensing is a challenge with machine learning. That doesn't mean that they're pausing development because of that.

I never said they are pausing development, if they ignore the so called “racist” stuff they can already add the thing to Scratch by now

This you?

sharkode wrote:

From what I've heard, it seems like face sensing wasn't a thing because apparently face sensing is “racist”

Yes, by saying “it wasn't a thing” I meant more like "it wasn't a thing yet".

VedanshS933 wrote:

sharkode wrote:

qloakonscratch wrote:

sharkode wrote:

rayli1123 wrote:

sharkode wrote:

dhuls wrote:

sharkode wrote:

From what I've heard, it seems like face sensing wasn't a thing because apparently face sensing is “racist”

citation needed

https://medium.com/scratchteam-blog/exploring-a-creative-safe-introduction-to-machine-learning-c42f1d0133e7

It says that racial and gender group sensing is a challenge with machine learning. That doesn't mean that they're pausing development because of that.

I never said they are pausing development, if they ignore the so called “racist” stuff they can already add the thing to Scratch by now

This you?

sharkode wrote:

From what I've heard, it seems like face sensing wasn't a thing because apparently face sensing is “racist”

Yes, by saying “it wasn't a thing” I meant more like "it wasn't a thing yet".

What?