Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
- imfh
-
1000+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Your browser doesn't let webpages get the current nano second for security reasons. I also can't think of any reason to need the current micro second. You can, however, get milliseconds using the days since 2000 block which has high precision.
24 hours * 60 minutes * 60 seconds * 1000 miliseconds = 86,400,000 = 86.4*10^6 = 86.4e6
24 hours * 60 minutes * 60 seconds * 1000 miliseconds = 86,400,000 = 86.4*10^6 = 86.4e6
((days since 2000) * (86.4e6)) // milliseconds since 2000
- fdreerf
-
1000+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Micro and nanoseconds are too small units of times for Scratch to keep track of; each frame is only 1/30th of a second and anything smaller might as well be 0.
Last edited by fdreerf (April 28, 2021 14:04:57)
- -Quantum_Studios-
-
500+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
No support. All of these blocks would be used much longer than these units remainede the same.
- stuck_in_2009
-
100+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
no support, if you use those blocks wrong, then they could probably crash your computer
- TopCode
-
1000+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
*slams head on table*Why is because those are my accounts too I have multipleAgreeI agree
Please say why
- PGBFLITE6373
-
1000+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
*table rebounds and hits my hand which makes me slap my forehead**slams head on table*Why is because those are my accounts too I have multipleAgreeI agree
Please say why
- sugarglidertotten
-
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
when green flag clicked
say (current [millisecond v]) for (2) secs
- sugarglidertotten
-
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
(((days since 2000) * (86400000)) mod (1000))
- boncuk18
-
1000+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Please dont spam. also millisecond is a dupe. -snip-
Last edited by boncuk18 (April 29, 2021 07:23:43)
- sugarglidertotten
-
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
define millisecond
- sugarglidertotten
-
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Also I now milli is a dupePlease dont spam. also millisecond is a dupe. -snip-
- sugarglidertotten
-
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
My browser / operating system: MacOS Macintosh X 10.15.6, Safari 14.0.3, No Flash version detected
- sugarglidertotten
-
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
(current [ millisecondv])
- sugarglidertotten
-
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
go to [Interstella space time v]
- p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-
-
1000+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
can't you like have the system subtract the amount from the number? I mean, it's not that hard…Well, microsecond would be TOTALLY inaccurate since HPCs (High Precision Clocks) are about 22,500 miles above Earth in geosyncronous orbit, and about time delay being about 5 seconds.. I vote that there should be a current millisecond, microsecond, nanosecond, even if not many people need it it’s not gonna do any harm just to be a block. I like to build a lot of clock things or timers and for milliseconds, microseconds, nanosecond. it would be easier to have current milli, micro and nano seconds then days since 2000 * 86400000 mod 1000. I spent hours browsing the internet for a code for these timings and I found the millisecond discussion and thought it should be a thing. Also Macie 1234 for the code script I actually found in the discussion. 100% full support. Even if no one uses it, it doesn’t do any harm does it? Just to have extra?
-sugarglidertotten
Nanoseconds will totally blind you
Support for milliseconds tho.
- p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-
-
1000+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Hi there! It's awesome you want to test the scratchblocks pluggin, it's really cool! However, please restrain from using just the blocks off-topic, unless doing so here. thanksgo to [Interstella space time v]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/beb45/beb45b49f95a433b05ceb80410529d33775aa36f" alt=""
- Scratchperson1000000
-
500+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
STOP SPAMMING YOU'RE GETTING SUPER ANNOYING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5454f/5454fb6963f3bbe681812501e3cabb08cc859de9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5454f/5454fb6963f3bbe681812501e3cabb08cc859de9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5454f/5454fb6963f3bbe681812501e3cabb08cc859de9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5454f/5454fb6963f3bbe681812501e3cabb08cc859de9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5454f/5454fb6963f3bbe681812501e3cabb08cc859de9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41bf6/41bf6ac920b70fe0d7af01362e79652e2dc2438c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41bf6/41bf6ac920b70fe0d7af01362e79652e2dc2438c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41bf6/41bf6ac920b70fe0d7af01362e79652e2dc2438c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41bf6/41bf6ac920b70fe0d7af01362e79652e2dc2438c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41bf6/41bf6ac920b70fe0d7af01362e79652e2dc2438c" alt=""
- gosoccerboy5
-
1000+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Does the average device have the capability to reliably measure (and possibly display) nanoseconds and microseconds in realtime?
- p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-
-
1000+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Does the average device have the capability to reliably measure (and possibly display) nanoseconds and microseconds in realtime?
can't you like have the system subtract the amount from the number? I mean, it's not that hard…Well, microsecond would be TOTALLY inaccurate since HPCs (High Precision Clocks) are about 22,500 miles above Earth in geosyncronous orbit, and about time delay being about 5 seconds.. I vote that there should be a current millisecond, microsecond, nanosecond, even if not many people need it it’s not gonna do any harm just to be a block. I like to build a lot of clock things or timers and for milliseconds, microseconds, nanosecond. it would be easier to have current milli, micro and nano seconds then days since 2000 * 86400000 mod 1000. I spent hours browsing the internet for a code for these timings and I found the millisecond discussion and thought it should be a thing. Also Macie 1234 for the code script I actually found in the discussion. 100% full support. Even if no one uses it, it doesn’t do any harm does it? Just to have extra?
-sugarglidertotten
Nanoseconds will totally blind you
Support for milliseconds tho.
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
-
» Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond