LlamaGodLuke wrote:

There is an upcoming Kirby tourney. This probably disproves Bandana Dee as DLC.

Twin138956Scratch wrote:

I mean PSTBF (Propose Studios To Be Featured) surpassed 10k, and it still works for me.

BIurriface wrote:

imagine taking this game seriously. anyway don chan for smash

StruckByTheRain wrote:

BIurriface wrote:

imagine taking this game seriously. anyway don chan for smash

Competitive Smash cuts out most of the stages and fun. If a stage has a pretty fun gimmick, it's banned in competitive play. I can see why, but it's unnecessary.

Oh, and there's like, only 5 stages legal, and they're boring. (They're Battlefield, Final Destination, Lylat Cruise, Pokemon Stadium 2, and Smashville.)

Bluebatstar wrote:

StruckByTheRain wrote:

BIurriface wrote:

imagine taking this game seriously. anyway don chan for smash

Competitive Smash cuts out most of the stages and fun. If a stage has a pretty fun gimmick, it's banned in competitive play. I can see why, but it's unnecessary.

Oh, and there's like, only 5 stages legal, and they're boring. (They're Battlefield, Final Destination, Lylat Cruise, Pokemon Stadium 2, and Smashville.)

The reason I prefer the competitive stages is because 99% of the stage gimmicks just interrupt the flow of play, leading to a lot of weird stuff, losses due to that stuff, and are just too interferent on the battle.

Having no-gimmick stages allows for battles to be a lot more intense, where you're more in control of the outcome.

Bluebatstar wrote:

StruckByTheRain wrote:

BIurriface wrote:

imagine taking this game seriously. anyway don chan for smash

Competitive Smash cuts out most of the stages and fun. If a stage has a pretty fun gimmick, it's banned in competitive play. I can see why, but it's unnecessary.

Oh, and there's like, only 5 stages legal, and they're boring. (They're Battlefield, Final Destination, Lylat Cruise, Pokemon Stadium 2, and Smashville.)

The reason I prefer the competitive stages is because 99% of the stage gimmicks just interrupt the flow of play, leading to a lot of weird stuff, losses due to that stuff, and are just too interferent on the battle.

Having no-gimmick stages allows for battles to be a lot more intense, where you're more in control of the outcome.

StruckByTheRain wrote:

BIurriface wrote:

imagine taking this game seriously. anyway don chan for smash

Competitive Smash cuts out most of the stages and fun. If a stage has a pretty fun gimmick, it's banned in competitive play. I can see why, but it's unnecessary.

Oh, and there's like, only 5 stages legal, and they're boring. (They're Battlefield, Final Destination, Lylat Cruise, Pokemon Stadium 2, and Smashville.)

sheelepe2026 wrote:

hulkandironman wrote:

-gge wrote:

this topic is gonna have to migrate soon.
it's about to reach 500 pages (when most topics move)

That's pointless, why would we have to change forum just because we have a lot of posts?

it makes it lag when you try to post or go to the topic

Bluebatstar wrote:

StruckByTheRain wrote:

BIurriface wrote:

imagine taking this game seriously. anyway don chan for smash

Competitive Smash cuts out most of the stages and fun. If a stage has a pretty fun gimmick, it's banned in competitive play. I can see why, but it's unnecessary.

Oh, and there's like, only 5 stages legal, and they're boring. (They're Battlefield, Final Destination, Lylat Cruise, Pokemon Stadium 2, and Smashville.)

The reason I prefer the competitive stages is because 99% of the stage gimmicks just interrupt the flow of play, leading to a lot of weird stuff, losses due to that stuff, and are just too interferent on the battle.

Having no-gimmick stages allows for battles to be a lot more intense, where you're more in control of the outcome.

Twin138956Scratch wrote:

LET'S GO!

Bluebatstar wrote:

Twin138956Scratch wrote:

LET'S GO!

Ummm… what?

Bluebatstar wrote:

The only think I can think of that made you say that was the V11.0.1 Update, which fixes an unintentional change to Header (Wii Fit Trainer Side-B) landing lag, and even then that's a weird, tiny thing to celebrate over.

DC382 wrote:

Bluebatstar wrote:

The only think I can think of that made you say that was the V11.0.1 Update, which fixes an unintentional change to Header (Wii Fit Trainer Side-B) landing lag, and even then that's a weird, tiny thing to celebrate over.

Oh god was that some Meta Knight in Brawl stuff with the Side B?

DC382 wrote:

Bluebatstar wrote:

The only think I can think of that made you say that was the V11.0.1 Update, which fixes an unintentional change to Header (Wii Fit Trainer Side-B) landing lag, and even then that's a weird, tiny thing to celebrate over.

Oh god was that some Meta Knight in Brawl stuff with the Side B?

StruckByTheRain wrote:

BIurriface wrote:

imagine taking this game seriously. anyway don chan for smash

Competitive Smash cuts out most of the stages and fun. If a stage has a pretty fun gimmick, it's banned in competitive play. I can see why, but it's unnecessary.

Oh, and there's like, only 5 stages legal, and they're boring. (They're Battlefield, Final Destination, Lylat Cruise, Pokemon Stadium 2, and Smashville.)

JuneandBabyThor wrote:

So yesterday i was playing smash as kirby since I wanted to see how bad he is but literally he is bad
Half of all of his moves have a lot of end lag
And if you hit it barley does any damage
Now I love ridley though he 1 million % deserves higher tier

if <die> then
Punish
end

braxbroscratcher wrote:

WolfCat67 wrote:

Hey guys keep Undertale and Minecraft away from this beloved series

We both know those games are no longer at their popularity peak or important at this point

Minecraft's popularity still outdoes Steam as a platform. But I doubt that they would do that, my reasons below.

Also, undertale in Smash? This is such a juicy joke that I'll waste a post shooting it down.

For one, Sans would not work. The 1DEF canonical restriction makes it so that they'd have to make him start at 300% or more in normal mode and then have insanely powerful attacks to compensate - which would utterly RUIN sudden death.

Frisk? They're a player character and a blank slate. They're not that iconic, and their abilities would be pretty boring to match. A melee attack, some form of healing special, and then some form of throwing knife attack or something? Idk. Same with Steve - you can reskin Steve in game for heaven's sake and I think the blocks themselves are more iconic than Steve himself.

Papyrus might work as a Smash character because of the weak ability set and so on allowing the moveset to be close to canon and be completely fair. But it wouldn't make sense at all why he'd appear in the arena of death and destruction that is smash bros. And noone would take the game seriously if he appeared in it.

I feel like you'd almost be more likely to see Asgore or Undyne or something in Smash, but I doubt that too - Nintendo hasn't featured many indie games in Smash afaik.