Go To Layer (Ehh I dunno how many supporters --- a lot)

OmnipotentPotato

Theses blocks should be added:

go to layer () :: looks

change layer by () :: looks // in replace of "go back () layers"

layer :: looks reporter

Last edited by OmnipotentPotato (March 1, 2015 22:43:41)

TheHockeyist

Support!

theonlygusti

Yes! Total support!

20btheilmanngohr

Can't you just do

go to front
go back (10) layers:: number of layers you want to go back

That's what I do. No support.
But the layer reporter…I semi-support. Think you could list a couple of examples using this reporter?

Last edited by 20btheilmanngohr (Oct. 6, 2014 08:25:13)

MegaApuTurkUltra

Support

theonlygusti

20btheilmanngohr wrote:
Can't you just do
go to front
go back (10) layers:: number of layers you want to go back
That's what I do. No support.
But the layer reporter…I semi-support. Think you could list a couple of examples using this reporter?

You can do that, but I think these blocks are just for utility's sake.

OmnipotentPotato

theonlygusti wrote:
20btheilmanngohr wrote:
Can't you just do
go to front
go back (10) layers:: number of layers you want to go back
That's what I do. No support.
But the layer reporter…I semi-support. Think you could list a couple of examples using this reporter?
You can do that, but I think these blocks are just for utility's sake.

Yeah pretty much this. Perhaps have:

change layer by () :: looks

And then get rid of the “Go back” layer block.

Oh and for the boolean thing sometimes it's just hard to tell the layer of stuff and when you're making a project that's really picky about layers, it would just save so much trouble.

Last edited by OmnipotentPotato (Oct. 6, 2014 13:37:42)

gcenac

S to the u to the double p drop it back to the o and bring it back for the r and t

TheHockeyist

gcenac wrote:
S to the u to the double p drop it back to the o and bring it back for the r and t

Are you in cheer by any chance? They do weird things with spelling…

gcenac

TheHockeyist wrote:
gcenac wrote:
S to the u to the double p drop it back to the o and bring it back for the r and t

Are you in cheer by any chance? They do weird things with spelling…

XD no but I am huge in spirit for my high school and my favorite college…
And I enjoy doing this instead of just support

I am weird like that

theonlygusti

gcenac wrote:
TheHockeyist wrote:
gcenac wrote:
S to the u to the double p drop it back to the o and bring it back for the r and t

Are you in cheer by any chance? They do weird things with spelling…
XD no but I am huge in spirit for my high school and my favorite college…
And I enjoy doing this instead of just support
I am weird like that

Yes, you are weird like that.

OmnipotentPotato

theonlygusti wrote:
gcenac wrote:
TheHockeyist wrote:
gcenac wrote:
S to the u to the double p drop it back to the o and bring it back for the r and t

Are you in cheer by any chance? They do weird things with spelling…
XD no but I am huge in spirit for my high school and my favorite college…
And I enjoy doing this instead of just support
I am weird like that
Yes, you are weird like that.

Rood. I think it's better than saying support/a sub.

OmnipotentPotato

BUMP

TimothyLawyer

No support.

go to front
go back (10) layers:: number of layers you want to go back

are sufficient.

OmnipotentPotato

TimothyLawyer wrote:
No support.
go to front
go back (10) layers:: number of layers you want to go back
are sufficient.

What about the other block?

Cyoce

(S(U(P(P(O(R(T :: looks reporter) :: motion reporter) :: sensing reporter) :: operators reporter)::control reporter) :: variables reporter) :: obsolete reporter)

OmnipotentPotato

Cyoce wrote:

(S(U(P(P(O(R(T :: looks reporter) :: motion reporter) :: sensing reporter) :: operators reporter)::control reporter) :: variables reporter) :: obsolete reporter)

So beautiful! O.O

djdolphin

Support

KingOfAwesome58219

Support
go

go to front
go back (10) layers

Can be really confusing.

Blaze349

TheHockeyist wrote:
Support!

Discuss Scratch