dftyu wrote:

geometric_ghast wrote:

xXRedTheCoderXx wrote:

dftyu wrote:

xXRedTheCoderXx wrote:

dftyu wrote:

no, it's from june of 2020 https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/418825/?page=1#post-4178864

I saw that post - and that's not asking about x__0. It's in the TIRAP forum.

I mean, I guess that could count depending on how you look at it.

Also, because x__0 is an existing user, wouldn't that be gossiping?

but, how many questions about gdpr000somthing1 have u seen?

More than x__0, that's for sure.

Anyway, I think I'm just going to add x__0, the only thing I'm still concerned about is whether it's considered gossiping.

I wouldn't think so. That person hasn't had any activity in over 5 months, and you aren't providing any theories in it. I would consider that good to add, just not if you should add it.

there is one semi-confirmed theory, that x__0 is @Dyaros. (dead link)

dftyu wrote:

geometric_ghast wrote:

xXRedTheCoderXx wrote:

dftyu wrote:

xXRedTheCoderXx wrote:

dftyu wrote:

no, it's from june of 2020 https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/418825/?page=1#post-4178864

I saw that post - and that's not asking about x__0. It's in the TIRAP forum.

I mean, I guess that could count depending on how you look at it.

Also, because x__0 is an existing user, wouldn't that be gossiping?

but, how many questions about gdpr000somthing1 have u seen?

More than x__0, that's for sure.

Anyway, I think I'm just going to add x__0, the only thing I'm still concerned about is whether it's considered gossiping.

I wouldn't think so. That person hasn't had any activity in over 5 months, and you aren't providing any theories in it. I would consider that good to add, just not if you should add it.

there is one semi-confirmed theory, that x__0 is @Dyaros. (dead link)

xXRedTheCoderXx wrote:

Okay guys, I will add a bit about x__0, but it won't mention anything about @Dyaros. Sound good?

xXRedTheCoderXx wrote:

Okay guys, I will add a bit about x__0, but it won't mention anything about @Dyaros. Sound good?

fdreerf wrote:

I don't think they are significant enough to be added, mainly because I don't know who they are.

geometric_ghast wrote:

x__0 is becoming less relevant over time.

xXRedTheCoderXx wrote:

fdreerf wrote:

I don't think they are significant enough to be added, mainly because I don't know who they are.

geometric_ghast wrote:

x__0 is becoming less relevant over time.

Okay, now I don't know whether to add them anymore.

xXRedTheCoderXx wrote:

fdreerf wrote:

I don't think they are significant enough to be added, mainly because I don't know who they are.

geometric_ghast wrote:

x__0 is becoming less relevant over time.

Okay, now I don't know whether to add them anymore.

geometric_ghast wrote:

It's up to you. After all, you are the sticky owner

xXRedTheCoderXx wrote:

geometric_ghast wrote:

It's up to you. After all, you are the sticky owner

Hmm… I'm on the fence with this one

*intense thinking noises*

After a long time of thinking (a couple minutes) I have decided the following:

I believe that they are not relative enough to be placed on this list as of now. However, if a genuine post is made asking about x__0 is made in less month from the time of this being posted, I will have another thought and possibly add them to the list.

I think that sounds okay.

geometric_ghast wrote:

That seems good! Keep up the great work on the sticky.

ANORDQ2324 wrote:

Congrats for Sticky

-Zyte- wrote:

Congrats on the sticky!

-Zyte- wrote:

*cough* *cough* some ST member still hasn't got back to me about my guide on wether it will just continue to get bumped or closed or stickied *cough* *cough*

Byron_Inc wrote:

I suggest adding the policies of YouTube to Section 0.

Youtube ToU wrote:

Permissions and Restrictions:

You may access and use the Service as made available to you, as long as you comply with this Agreement and applicable law. You may view or listen to Content for your personal, non-commercial use. You may also show YouTube videos through the embeddable YouTube player.

The following restrictions apply to your use of the Service. You are not allowed to:

1. access, reproduce, download, distribute, transmit, broadcast, display, sell, license, alter, modify or otherwise use any part of the Service or any Content except: (a) as expressly authorized by the Service; or (b) with prior written permission from YouTube and, if applicable, the respective rights holders;

-Zyte- wrote:

Byron_Inc wrote:

I suggest adding the policies of YouTube to Section 0.

Youtube ToU wrote:

Permissions and Restrictions:

You may access and use the Service as made available to you, as long as you comply with this Agreement and applicable law. You may view or listen to Content for your personal, non-commercial use. You may also show YouTube videos through the embeddable YouTube player.

The following restrictions apply to your use of the Service. You are not allowed to:

1. access, reproduce, download, distribute, transmit, broadcast, display, sell, license, alter, modify or otherwise use any part of the Service or any Content except: (a) as expressly authorized by the Service; or (b) with prior written permission from YouTube and, if applicable, the respective rights holders;

here it is

xXRedTheCoderXx wrote:

-Zyte- wrote:

Byron_Inc wrote:

I suggest adding the policies of YouTube to Section 0.

Youtube ToU wrote:

Permissions and Restrictions:

You may access and use the Service as made available to you, as long as you comply with this Agreement and applicable law. You may view or listen to Content for your personal, non-commercial use. You may also show YouTube videos through the embeddable YouTube player.

The following restrictions apply to your use of the Service. You are not allowed to:

1. access, reproduce, download, distribute, transmit, broadcast, display, sell, license, alter, modify or otherwise use any part of the Service or any Content except: (a) as expressly authorized by the Service; or (b) with prior written permission from YouTube and, if applicable, the respective rights holders;

here it is

Thanks, but I don't think that's what he means.

Bryon_Inc, do you mean like the rules for sharing videos on YouTube videos, livestreams, and channels on Scratch? That's in moderating Scratch.

ThatOneWeirdDude wrote:

They mean that you should add a question about Youtube to Mp3's and how it breaks the policies.