ResExsention wrote:

So a block that pulls up the on screen keyboard on mobile, basically?

ResExsention wrote:

Still no. If you want input script it yourself for maximum customisability.

ResExsention wrote:

What do you mean, “semi-pros maybe don't want to mess around with it”? If they know how to make said thing they should have NO issue repeating it.

set [input v] to []
if <key [a v] pressed?> then
set [input v] to [a]
if <key [shift v] pressed?> then
set [input v] to [A]
end
end
if <key [b v] pressed?> then
set [input v] to [b]
if <key [shift v] pressed?> then
set [input v] to [B]
end
end
...
...
...

ResExsention wrote:

On a second note, laziness doesn't go far…

ResExsention wrote:

.___.

script it yourself for maximum customisability… My friend, if you were willing to commit time into a certain project, not only would you have a “perfect” text input system for your thing, you also won't have to use the completely out of place default on screen keyboard.

For the sake of polish, do it yourself.

ResExsention wrote:

.___.

script it yourself for maximum customisability… My friend, if you were willing to commit time into a certain project, not only would you have a “perfect” text input system for your thing, you also won't have to use the completely out of place default on screen keyboard.

For the sake of polish, do it yourself.

set [color v] effect to (0)

move () steps

broadcast [ v]

(foo)

((2) * (3))

delete (all v) of [num1 numbers v] delete (all v) of [num2 numbers v] delete (all v) of [product digits v] set [product v] to [0] set [dec pos 1 v] to [0] set [dec pos 2 v] to [0] if <(answer) < [0]> then set [count v] to [1] set [no 1 negative v] to [y] else set [count v] to [0] set [no 1 negative v] to [n] end repeat (length of ()) change [count v] by (1) if <not <(letter (count) of ()) = [.]>> then add (letter (count) of ()) to [num1 numbers v] else set [dec pos 1 v] to ((length of (answer)) - (count)) end end if <[] < [0]> then set [count v] to [1] set [no 2 negative v] to [y] else set [count v] to [0] set [no 2 negative v] to [n] end repeat (length of ()) change [count v] by (1) if <not <(letter (count) of ()) = [.]>> then add (letter (count) of ()) to [num2 numbers v] else set [dec pos 2 v] to ((length of (answer)) - (count)) end end set [num1 v] to (num1 numbers) set [num2 v] to (num2 numbers) repeat (num1) //start change [product v] by (num2) end set [decimal position v] to ((dec pos 1) + (dec pos 2)) set [count v] to [0] repeat (length of (product)) change [count v] by (1) add (letter (count) of (product)) to [product digits v] end if <not <(decimal position) = [0]>> then insert [.] at ((length of [product digits v]) - ((decimal position) - (1))) of [product digits v] end if <<<(no 1 negative) = [y]> or <(no 2 negative) = [y]>> and <not <<(no 1 negative) = [y]> and <(no 2 negative) = [y]>>>> then insert [-] at (1 v) of [product digits v] end set [product v] to (product digits)

glide () secs to x: (0) y: (0)

HTML-Fan wrote:

Okay, I just think that you should be able to use the basic OS and browser functions.

HTML-Fan wrote:

Actually it's incredibly lazy to have sprites and multitasking! So lazy! And blocks! Why don't we just use Assembler or Hex? You won't get far if you stay soooo lazy! Multitasking!

when [a v] key pressed
add [a] to [input v]

when [b v] key pressed
add [b] to [input v] // and so on so forth, there is also only adding the necessary keys which is much easier

when green flag clicked
forever
if <<[list v] contains [letter] ?> and <[list v] contains [another letter] ?>> then // so on so forth
do thing
end
end