Saving Scratch 2.0

37_Scratch

WE WANT SCRATCH 2.0 WITHOUT ADOBE FLASH!
or
I like Scratch 3.0.

Post your opinion here!
Project: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/projects/278195249
Scratch on!

Za-Chary

Scratch 2.0 without Adobe Flash is Scratch 3.0.

The Scratch Team is not considering an option to switch the “skin” of Scratch 3.0.

Marx90

37_Scratch wrote:
WE WANT SCRATCH 2.0 WITHOUT ADOBE FLASH!
or
I like Scratch 3.0.

Post your opinion here!
Project: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/projects/278195249
Scratch on!

NO! NO NO AND NO! SCRATCH 3.0 RULES, NOT 2.0! ITS SO BORING! ACCEPT WITH ME!

Last edited by Marx90 (Feb. 4, 2019 14:47:03)

Sammynams · Saving Scratch 2.0 … *Last edited by Sammynams (Feb. 5, 2019 07:06:59)*

…

Last edited by Sammynams (Feb. 5, 2019 07:06:59)

TheOneGuy101

Marx90 wrote:
37_Scratch wrote:
WE WANT SCRATCH 2.0 WITHOUT ADOBE FLASH!
or
I like Scratch 3.0.

Post your opinion here!
Project: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/projects/278195249
Scratch on!
NO! NO NO AND NO! SCRATCH 3.0 RULES, NOT 2.0! ITS SO BORING! ACCEPT WITH ME!

I don't agree with you. Scratch Team must make Scratch 2.0 with HTML5 or something and then tweak the HTML5 a little bit so it acts just like Adobe Flash.

Za-Chary

TheOneGuy101 wrote:
Marx90 wrote:
37_Scratch wrote:
WE WANT SCRATCH 2.0 WITHOUT ADOBE FLASH!
or
I like Scratch 3.0.

Post your opinion here!
Project: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/projects/278195249
Scratch on!
NO! NO NO AND NO! SCRATCH 3.0 RULES, NOT 2.0! ITS SO BORING! ACCEPT WITH ME!
I don't agree with you. Scratch Team must make Scratch 2.0 with HTML5 or something and then tweak the HTML5 a little bit so it acts just like Adobe Flash.

I think it's a little more complicated than you make it sound.

dude341

Za-Chary wrote:
I think it's a little more complicated than you make it sound.

Surprisingly, you'll find that it's not that complicated! Scratch 2 is written in Flash and ActionScript. ActionScript is quite similar to another language called Haxe, which supports compiling to HTML5. And yes, before you ask, someone has ported 2.0 to HTML5 via this method! However, it is nowhere near complete, plus, it is no longer online. (edit: see below)

If the Scratch Team wanted to, they would have probably went this route, however, there are multiple reasons why 3.0 was built from the ground up, hence why 3.0 isn't a straight up port of 2.0.

EDIT: Found a working version: https://bobbybee.github.io/scratch-flash/release/ It's nowhere near complete so nothing really works but you can see just by using it it's 2.0, just without flash.

@37_Scratch, you can always use s2online (see my signature for more details)

Last edited by dude341 (Feb. 6, 2019 22:51:50)

dude341 · Saving Scratch 2.0 removed *Last edited by dude341 (Feb. 6, 2019 22:50:04)*

removed

Last edited by dude341 (Feb. 6, 2019 22:50:04)

MaximunPokeMaster

edit: whoops, i didn't read it correctly, but i'm still reporting it to be closed, because the suggestions forum isn't a good place to post advertisements

Last edited by MaximunPokeMaster (Feb. 7, 2019 19:50:42)

Paddle2See

Thanks for the suggestion but we're pretty committed to moving forward with Scratch 3.0 now. Please base your future suggestions from the assumption that we will be working with 3.0 as a baseline.

Discuss Scratch