Paddle2See wrote:

Sigton wrote:

dvargasews wrote:

Second, please change the title. It hasn't had 100% support for over 40 hours.

And the only purpose that false statement serves is click-bait.

Sigton

I wouldn't get too concerned about it. As I'm pretty sure I've pointed out in the past, adoption of suggestions isn't a popularity contest and it really doesn't matter how many supporters there are. It's the quality of the idea that counts, not the quantity of the supporters

Yeah, just more of a pet hate

Sigton

Sigton wrote:

Paddle2See wrote:

Sigton wrote:

dvargasews wrote:

Second, please change the title. It hasn't had 100% support for over 40 hours.

And the only purpose that false statement serves is click-bait.

Sigton

I wouldn't get too concerned about it. As I'm pretty sure I've pointed out in the past, adoption of suggestions isn't a popularity contest and it really doesn't matter how many supporters there are. It's the quality of the idea that counts, not the quantity of the supporters

Yeah, just more of a pet hate

Sigton

heh, personally I just make sure not to click on these suggestions to post since I don't appreciate the click-baiting.
(the only reason i clicked here was because Sigton posted… (may or may not have tried to second him >-<))

dvargasews wrote:

I think that that's report-worthy and possibly even ban-worthy.

Back to this part of the conversation, inaccurate click-bait (in terms of not being updated) should be report-worthy, but ban-worthy is a little overboard. Multiple instances in the form of spam could be, though.

Anyways, agreed that the “(100% support)” part of the title should be removed, but anyways…

</offtopic>

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

I can't make a very detailed post; everything I want to say has been said already.
I support, as I see absolutely no reason why this could be bad, or why it hasn't been added yet. I feel as though it may help you get rid of a comment that may not have broken the Community Guidelines, but you still wanted removed.

Okay, we can get over it because here's some more support!

WolfCat67 wrote:

I can't make a very detailed post; everything I want to say has been said already.
I support, as I see absolutely no reason why this could be bad, or why it hasn't been added yet. I feel as though it may help you get rid of a comment that may not have broken the Community Guidelines, but you still wanted removed.

Sigton wrote:

I think it should be just the owner. Sigton

MasterJPixel wrote:

Can't managers already do this? No support.-snip

Sheep_maker wrote:

Digital_Gaming wrote:

But if people really want to have A secret conversations than they'll just use projects and profiles. Just as a side note if the conversations where nice ( I know they probably where not but still) Than whats the problem?

When both people are managers they could delete each others comments once read, so others can't see them. (especially when both users are online at the same time)

MathlyCat wrote:

I only agree for Owners to delete comments. Managers are so plentiful that really having it that way would cause a lot of chaos.Owners only is the best option in my eyes.

Digital_Gaming wrote:

Sigton wrote:

Can you please remove my name from the list of supporters? I don't like being placed on one side of the argument.

Ok. I'll remove you.

And yet Sigton is still on the list of supporters.

gamebeater187 wrote:

No support. I feel like there is a duplicate and it would already be added.
no more 100% support >:D
Edit: Dont put me on the list, say there is one no supporter

dvargasews wrote:

gamebeater187 wrote:

No support. I feel like there is a duplicate and it would already be added.
no more 100% support >:D
Edit: Dont put me on the list, say there is one no supporter

Make that two; I don't like it because there can be multiple managers of a studio, a if one deletes a comment that the other one didn't want to be deleted, there could be retribution by demoting the one who deleted it. Also, as a matter of principle, I don't think that one should be able to delete comments that someone else (not including the Scratch team) can delete.

dvargasews wrote:

Digital_Gaming wrote:

Bump

First of all, if you're going to bump, would you at least bother putting some substance in the comment?
Second, please change the title. It hasn't had 100% support for over 40 hours.

dvargasews wrote:

gamebeater187 wrote:

No support. I feel like there is a duplicate and it would already be added.
no more 100% support >:D
Edit: Dont put me on the list, say there is one no supporter

Make that two; I don't like it because there can be multiple managers of a studio, a if one deletes a comment that the other one didn't want to be deleted, there could be retribution by demoting the one who deleted it. Also, as a matter of principle, I don't think that one should be able to delete comments that someone else (not including the Scratch team) can delete.

Sigton wrote:

dvargasews wrote:

Second, please change the title. It hasn't had 100% support for over 40 hours.

And the only purpose that false statement serves is click-bait.

Sigton

dvargasews wrote:

Sigton wrote:

dvargasews wrote:

Second, please change the title. It hasn't had 100% support for over 40 hours.

And the only purpose that false statement serves is click-bait.

Sigton

I think that that's report-worthy and possibly even ban-worthy.

QuantumSingularity wrote:

dvargasews wrote:

Sigton wrote:

dvargasews wrote:

Second, please change the title. It hasn't had 100% support for over 40 hours.

And the only purpose that false statement serves is click-bait.

Sigton

I think that that's report-worthy and possibly even ban-worthy.

I feel the same way.

dvargasews wrote:

Paddle2See wrote:

Sigton wrote:

dvargasews wrote:

Second, please change the title. It hasn't had 100% support for over 40 hours.

And the only purpose that false statement serves is click-bait.

Sigton

I wouldn't get too concerned about it. As I'm pretty sure I've pointed out in the past, adoption of suggestions isn't a popularity contest and it really doesn't matter how many supporters there are. It's the quality of the idea that counts, not the quantity of the supporters

It's a psychological thing: People will be enticed to click on it by the “100% support” text.

MathlyCat wrote:

Sigton wrote:

Paddle2See wrote:

Sigton wrote:

dvargasews wrote:

Second, please change the title. It hasn't had 100% support for over 40 hours.

And the only purpose that false statement serves is click-bait.

Sigton

I wouldn't get too concerned about it. As I'm pretty sure I've pointed out in the past, adoption of suggestions isn't a popularity contest and it really doesn't matter how many supporters there are. It's the quality of the idea that counts, not the quantity of the supporters

Yeah, just more of a pet hate

Sigton

heh, personally I just make sure not to click on these suggestions to post since I don't appreciate the click-baiting.
(the only reason i clicked here was because Sigton posted… (may or may not have tried to second him >-<))

Austinato wrote:

dvargasews wrote:

I think that that's report-worthy and possibly even ban-worthy.

Back to this part of the conversation, inaccurate click-bait (in terms of not being updated) should be report-worthy, but ban-worthy is a little overboard. Multiple instances in the form of spam could be, though.

Anyways, agreed that the “(100% support)” part of the title should be removed, but anyways…

</offtopic>

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

Would you please get rid of the 100% support it the title, it's inaccurate, it serves as clickbait, and you've been called out for it, but you still haven't gotten rid of it. You may put over 75% support if you want, but not anything that's not true. Also, please remove the names of gamebeater187 and everyone else would does not support it.

awesome-llama wrote:

people wrote:

…too lazy to find the duplicate…

Don't worry, I have found a duplicate: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/50490/
Edit: There seems to be a few duplicates.

Also, I found this:

paddle2see wrote:

Unfortunately, we ran into some situations where people were abusing that feature to have secret conversations - so it was removed. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Source: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/44318/?page=1#post-853392

-snip

Not only is this topic a duplicate, but it's already been rejected by the Scratch Team for a perfectly legitimate reason, so would the Scratch Team please close this topic and jvvg please add it to the list of rejected suggestions?

dvargasews wrote:

Would you please get rid of the 100% support it the title, it's inaccurate, it serves as clickbait, and you've been called out for it, but you still haven't gotten rid of it. You may put over 75% support if you want, but not anything that's not true. Also, please remove the names of gamebeater187 and everyone else would does not support it.

Yes, it's not ideal and we'd prefer it changed. However, as Paddle2See has already said, it's not that big of a deal, so let it be. Making a fuss about it has caused more problems than a misleading title ever could.

dvargasews wrote:

awesome-llama wrote:

people wrote:

…too lazy to find the duplicate…

Don't worry, I have found a duplicate: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/50490/
Edit: There seems to be a few duplicates.

Also, I found this:

paddle2see wrote:

Unfortunately, we ran into some situations where people were abusing that feature to have secret conversations - so it was removed. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Source: https://scratch-mit-edu.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/discuss/topic/44318/?page=1#post-853392

-snip

Not only is this topic a duplicate, but it's already been rejected by the Scratch Team for a perfectly legitimate reason, so would the Scratch Team please close this topic and jvvg please add it to the list of rejected suggestions?

Ah yes, I had forgotten about that. It is a feature that I can understand the desire for, but it did cause some problems, so it was removed. Sorry about that. If you have trouble with spam comments, you can always report them.