i want one obsolete block back

Sheep_maker

MathlyCat wrote:
cs377310 wrote:
i want point away from edge back for like touching colors and then it points away from the edge like bouncing
when clickedforeverif touching color ? thenpoint away from edge
Sorry, no support.

There are over 100 ways to point a sprite away from the edge. It's workaroundable, and is buggy. Some 2.0 mods have this block, as it can still function from the old 1.4 days.
360 not 100; a circle is full rotation.

It's not buggy either, it just doesn't make sense. Try to point away from every wall. (Floor and ceiling are walls) You would end up pointing in degree undefined.
No support.

Therefore we should remove this block:

point towards [mouse-pointer v]

because going to the cursor and then pointing at it would be undefined.

-raspberry_

Support!

Lythium

No support. Way too ambiguous. It was removed because it was really buggy.

Harakou

Merged two sizable threads together. Sorry for any confusion!

zsarAliz

I want the scrolling back

MathlyCat

Sheep_maker wrote:
MathlyCat wrote:
cs377310 wrote:
i want point away from edge back for like touching colors and then it points away from the edge like bouncing
when clickedforeverif touching color ? thenpoint away from edge
Sorry, no support.

There are over 100 ways to point a sprite away from the edge. It's workaroundable, and is buggy. Some 2.0 mods have this block, as it can still function from the old 1.4 days.
360 not 100; a circle is full rotation.

It's not buggy either, it just doesn't make sense. Try to point away from every wall. (Floor and ceiling are walls) You would end up pointing in degree undefined.
No support.
Therefore we should remove this block:
point towards [mouse-pointer v]
because going to the cursor and then pointing at it would be undefined.

Can please stay with the block? I'm not asking for the removal of that block, nor is your argument analogical to mine.

Meep5010

no support

potato(potato(potato(potato(potato<potato::stack> ::stack variables)::stack control)::stack operators)::stack pen)::motion

Last edited by Meep5010 (June 21, 2016 21:13:02)

DaSpudLord

Meep5010 wrote:
no support

Why?

Meep5010 wrote:

potato(potato(potato(potato(potato(potato(potato::stack red)::stack lists) ::stack variables)::stack control)::stack operators)::stack pen)::motion

Please don't blockspam.

Meep5010

DaSpudLord wrote:
Meep5010 wrote:
no support
Why?
Meep5010 wrote:
potato(potato(potato(potato(potato(potato(potato::stack red)::stack lists) ::stack variables)::stack control)::stack operators)::stack pen)::motion
Please don't blockspam.

that was supposed to be a part of my signature, but there wasn't enough room

agarraga

It was removed in the November 2006 Beta due to being glitchy,

cs395875

DownsGameClub wrote:
DaSpudLord wrote:
cs274283 wrote:
point away from edge
Please post your ideas in a new thread. This keeps everything organized. Thanks!
Actually, it is the exact same thing. So that is block spamming.

And details? Where would this block point to?

He wasn't blockspamming. He was explaining the new block.

24691357

No support. There is a workaround: Make a new empty sprite, and put this script in it:

when gf clicked
go to x: (0) y: (0)

Then use this block as a workaround.

point towards [newsprite v]

braxbroscratcher

TechEpic wrote:
I don't feel like making a script for it using the scratchblocks plugin here, but the obvious workaround would be to record every point on the edge to an accuracy of your choice, and get the distance between the object and each point. Then, find the most distant point and have the object point towards that point.

Or simply point to 0,0.

LordOfMuffins

^
|
|

I agree.

Last edited by LordOfMuffins (Nov. 24, 2016 21:39:38)

Discuss Scratch