Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
- CakeAxxa
-
18 posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
why? No support for the bigger size. Support for scrolling.
- Zekrom01
-
1000+ posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
With a bigger stage size it would probably lag older or really slow computers and like Blank1234 and CGRises said:why? No support for the bigger size. Support for scrolling.
average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks
no support
Scroll. No support. Period.
- CakeAxxa
-
18 posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
netbooks dont must use it and it wont lag? my pc is awesome + my internetWith a bigger stage size it would probably lag older or really slow computers and like Blank1234 and CGRises said:why? No support for the bigger size. Support for scrolling.average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks
no supportScroll. No support. Period.
- da-4th-account
-
18 posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
No support. This could ruin other old projects.
- Zekrom01
-
1000+ posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
And just cause your PC is fast doesn't mean other computers will lag with the bigger size stage…netbooks dont must use it and it wont lag? my pc is awesome + my internetWith a bigger stage size it would probably lag older or really slow computers and like Blank1234 and CGRises said:why? No support for the bigger size. Support for scrolling.average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks
no supportScroll. No support. Period.
- CakeAxxa
-
18 posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
if your pc isnt awesome you dont must use it only dont touch the bigger stages sizeAnd just cause your PC is fast doesn't mean other computers will lag with the bigger size stage…netbooks dont must use it and it wont lag? my pc is awesome + my internetWith a bigger stage size it would probably lag older or really slow computers and like Blank1234 and CGRises said:why? No support for the bigger size. Support for scrolling.average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks
no supportScroll. No support. Period.
- CakeAxxa
-
18 posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
nope No support. This could ruin other old projects.
you can change under edit. it wont will break nothing… Indifferent. I can see why it might be helpful, but what if it breaks current projects? What would happen if you tried to change the size of the stage when editing the project?
- iamunknown2
-
1000+ posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
What if the guy using a netbook wants to play a really awesome project that uses that feature?if your pc isnt awesome you dont must use it only dont touch the bigger stages sizeAnd just cause your PC is fast doesn't mean other computers will lag with the bigger size stage…netbooks dont must use it and it wont lag? my pc is awesome + my internetWith a bigger stage size it would probably lag older or really slow computers and like Blank1234 and CGRises said:why? No support for the bigger size. Support for scrolling.average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks
no supportScroll. No support. Period.
Last edited by iamunknown2 (Aug. 10, 2015 12:18:39)
- Zekrom01
-
1000+ posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
^ Exactly ^What if the guy using a netbook wants to play a really awesome project that uses that feature?if your pc isnt awesome you dont must use it only dont touch the bigger stages sizeAnd just cause your PC is fast doesn't mean other computers will lag with the bigger size stage…netbooks dont must use it and it wont lag? my pc is awesome + my internetWith a bigger stage size it would probably lag older or really slow computers and like Blank1234 and CGRises said:why? No support for the bigger size. Support for scrolling.average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks
no supportScroll. No support. Period.
- Nether_before
-
1000+ posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
This will exclude a lot of users from scratch. I have what I'm sure most would consider a decent laptop and I'm certain I'd get lag on something like this. No support.if your pc isnt awesome you dont must use it only dont touch the bigger stages sizeAnd just cause your PC is fast doesn't mean other computers will lag with the bigger size stage… netbooks dont must use it and it wont lag? my pc is awesome + my internet
- Zekrom01
-
1000+ posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
Yup. The same would happen for a lot more people.This will exclude a lot of users from scratch. I have what I'm sure most would consider a decent laptop and I'm certain I'd get lag on something like this. No support.if your pc isnt awesome you dont must use it only dont touch the bigger stages sizeAnd just cause your PC is fast doesn't mean other computers will lag with the bigger size stage… netbooks dont must use it and it wont lag? my pc is awesome + my internet
- Znapi
-
500+ posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
Yep. People will make their games to play at 1920 by 1080, and a majority of Scratcher's wouldn't be able to fully enjoy them because they don't have 1920x1080 monitors. Scaling it down for smaller screens will just make some things too small to see.This will exclude a lot of users from scratch. I have what I'm sure most would consider a decent laptop and I'm certain I'd get lag on something like this. No support.if your pc isnt awesome you dont must use it only dont touch the bigger stages sizeAnd just cause your PC is fast doesn't mean other computers will lag with the bigger size stage… netbooks dont must use it and it wont lag? my pc is awesome + my internet
- Zekrom01
-
1000+ posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
Yeah. Agreed. We should just keep the size as it is nowYep. People will make their games to play at 1920 by 1080, and a majority of Scratcher's wouldn't be able to fully enjoy them because they don't have 1920x1080 monitors. Scaling it down for smaller screens will just make some things too small to see.This will exclude a lot of users from scratch. I have what I'm sure most would consider a decent laptop and I'm certain I'd get lag on something like this. No support.if your pc isnt awesome you dont must use it only dont touch the bigger stages sizeAnd just cause your PC is fast doesn't mean other computers will lag with the bigger size stage… netbooks dont must use it and it wont lag? my pc is awesome + my internet
- ChocolatePi
-
1000+ posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
Sorry everyone, I meant change the size of the stage.
- Blank1234
-
500+ posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
dat doesn't work for scratch, i tried zooming out in the project editor to 75%, didn't workYou could just zoom on your browser… average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks
no support
- PrincessPanda_test_
-
1000+ posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
No support, might not be acceptable on some computers and possibly could break projects.
- CakeAxxa
-
18 posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
he can use zoom? or scratch will warn ( if you register you can select, computer or netbook. If netbook scratch will warn.)What if the guy using a netbook wants to play a really awesome project that uses that feature?if your pc isnt awesome you dont must use it only dont touch the bigger stages sizeAnd just cause your PC is fast doesn't mean other computers will lag with the bigger size stage…netbooks dont must use it and it wont lag? my pc is awesome + my internetWith a bigger stage size it would probably lag older or really slow computers and like Blank1234 and CGRises said:why? No support for the bigger size. Support for scrolling.average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks
no supportScroll. No support. Period.
- CakeAxxa
-
18 posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
it will warn you for lags and. SupportThis will exclude a lot of users from scratch. I have what I'm sure most would consider a decent laptop and I'm certain I'd get lag on something like this. No support.if your pc isnt awesome you dont must use it only dont touch the bigger stages sizeAnd just cause your PC is fast doesn't mean other computers will lag with the bigger size stage… netbooks dont must use it and it wont lag? my pc is awesome + my internet
- CakeAxxa
-
18 posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
i dont will be 1920x1080 960 x 720 is prefect and ZOOM?! not to high only 80% or so?Yep. People will make their games to play at 1920 by 1080, and a majority of Scratcher's wouldn't be able to fully enjoy them because they don't have 1920x1080 monitors. Scaling it down for smaller screens will just make some things too small to see.This will exclude a lot of users from scratch. I have what I'm sure most would consider a decent laptop and I'm certain I'd get lag on something like this. No support.if your pc isnt awesome you dont must use it only dont touch the bigger stages sizeAnd just cause your PC is fast doesn't mean other computers will lag with the bigger size stage… netbooks dont must use it and it wont lag? my pc is awesome + my internet
- CakeAxxa
-
18 posts
Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)
it will changed.. in new version will be the function with zoom.. not using chromes zoom or so only the scratch zoomdat doesn't work for scratch, i tried zooming out in the project editor to 75%, didn't workYou could just zoom on your browser… average netbook screen size: 840X480. this format wouldn't be able to work well with netbooks
no support
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
-
» Bigger Stage Size (ca. 960 x 720 or more)