Discuss Scratch
- seanbobe
-
500+ posts
A Better way to collaborate.
A lot of scratcher have suggested a way to invite other scratchers to do a project with them for collabs.
But there are some issues with this.
Pros:
Can help collabs without compromising the remix tree or multi-user accounts
Prevents collabs from sharing unfinished projects.
Cons:
Can create the rejected PMs
Violates liscence (if shared must be shared with everyone)
It has been argued over for a while.
Now I am suggesting a compromise.
My suggestion:
Does anyone have ideas? comments?
But there are some issues with this.
Pros:
Can help collabs without compromising the remix tree or multi-user accounts
Prevents collabs from sharing unfinished projects.
Cons:
Can create the rejected PMs
Violates liscence (if shared must be shared with everyone)
It has been argued over for a while.
Now I am suggesting a compromise.
My suggestion:
- The creator can do invites.
- However as soon as someone accepts an invite the project becomes open source.
- The share button is replaced by a complete button.
- Anyone can still see an incomplete project as if it was a complete project
- but it has a notice (like the username block notice) saying the project is an incomplete collaboration.
- When the project is completed any comments will be moved to a “development comments” section.
- Remixes will still be possible during development but the remix will have a notice saying it is a remix of a development.
- A log will be kept of changes.
- If two people work on it at once both copies will be kept and the creator will receive a notice and can revert to any version of the project
Does anyone have ideas? comments?
Supporters:
BlueCrayfish
Pot-of-gold
Princesspanda_test_
Seanbobe (obiously)
Sobsz
Thelucariokid
TheMonsterOfTheDeep
CosmicHamster
Nether_before
scrooge200
Letsgopitt
19f8361
tater22607
Semi:
Cupcake-shine
DaSpudLord
Rollercoasterfan
TheHockeyist
IronBit_Studios
852719
Non:
Firedrake969
Picklehazard
Blank1234
Overall:
16.75 support
22 people
Last edited by seanbobe (April 30, 2016 22:24:03)
- DaSpudLord
-
1000+ posts
A Better way to collaborate.
Semi-support, but two things-
- Non-editors still need to be able to run the project and scripts inside of it, as well as view the scripts.
- Not sure if this will be easy for the ST to implement, which is why I only semi-support.
- iamunknown2
-
1000+ posts
A Better way to collaborate.
Simple. Scratch -> Squeak (text version of Scratch), then send Squeak file, work on it, send back Squeak file, Squeak -> Scratch. Semi-support, but two things-
- Non-editors still need to be able to run the project and scripts inside of it, as well as view the scripts.
- Not sure if this will be easy for the ST to implement, which is why I only semi-support.
- rollercoasterfan
-
1000+ posts
A Better way to collaborate.
Semi-support, but two things-
- Non-editors still need to be able to run the project and scripts inside of it, as well as view the scripts.
- Not sure if this will be easy for the ST to implement, which is why I only semi-support.
- seanbobe
-
500+ posts
A Better way to collaborate.
Exactly. It becomes open source when someone accepts an invite.
- Non-editors still need to be able to run the project and scripts inside of it, as well as view the scripts.
- TheHockeyist
-
1000+ posts
A Better way to collaborate.
Semi-support as per DaSpudLord's argument.
- Firedrake969
-
1000+ posts
A Better way to collaborate.
No support, can still create chatrooms with no way of logging (if I'm reading this correctly)
- Pot-of-Gold
-
1000+ posts
A Better way to collaborate.
How? Its visible to evryone No support, can still create chatrooms with no way of logging (if I'm reading this correctly)
Why? Semi-support
- 19f8361
-
500+ posts
A Better way to collaborate.
1/2 support
now full support.
now full support.
Last edited by 19f8361 (June 25, 2015 22:03:04)